buildd on Armel, PowerPC and S390(x)? agree on narrowing error, why?

2011-12-09 Thread Steffen Möller
Dear list, I just sponsored a package that built nicely locally with g++ 6.4.2-5 on amd64 but fails on the platforms listed in the subject line: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ballsuite=sid which gives plenty of repeats of .. /source/DATATYPE/hashGrid.C:23:3: error:

Re: buildd on Armel, PowerPC and S390(x)? agree on narrowing error, why?

2011-12-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:41:35 +0100, Steffen Möller wrote: Gcc 4.6.2-5 on amd64 does not complain at all. I do not know the version of gcc on the buildds. The build logs will tell you which version of gcc and other toolchain packages were used. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: buildd on Armel, PowerPC and S390(x)? agree on narrowing error, why?

2011-12-09 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:41:35AM +0100, Steffen Möller wrote: Dear list, I just sponsored a package that built nicely locally with g++ 6.4.2-5 on amd64 but fails on the platforms listed in the subject line: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ballsuite=sid which gives

Re: devref and policy should agree on where to document tarball repacking

2009-12-18 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 17 déc. 09 à 17:28, Steve Langasek a écrit : Package: developers-reference Version: 3.4.3 On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 04:45:33PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: while checking the section 6.7.8.2 of the Developers reference (“Repackaged upstream source”)

Fwd: devref and policy should agree on where to document tarball repacking

2009-12-18 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Debian Developers debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian Bug Debian BTS submit sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Rép : devref and policy should agree on where to document tarball repacking Le 17 déc. 09 à 17:28, Steve Langasek a écrit : Package: developers-reference Version: 3.4.3 On Thu, Dec 10

Re: Bug#561494: Fwd: devref and policy should agree on where to document tarball repacking

2009-12-18 Thread Russ Allbery
Thibaut Paumard mlotpot.n...@free.fr writes: 2) most free licenses require to clearly specify modifications to licensed work. Deleting files is to be considered a modification of the source package, which _is_ the licensed work. By the same token, I am starting to realise that we should also

devref and policy should agree on where to document tarball repacking

2009-12-17 Thread Steve Langasek
is that debian/copyright is the right place for this, then we can reassign it to policy, but one way or the other one of these documents should be changed to agree with the other. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer

Re: UBTA - Wall Street Journal Agree - Ref. s1957

2006-05-24 Thread Lance Archer
Dalton, P2P Sports Betting Software May Change Casino Sports Betting VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - UBA Technology Inc. (UBTA), has entered into initial negotiations to install its proprietary betting exchange software in traditional land-based casinos. Read the whole story:

Re: UBTA - Wall Street Journal Agree - Ref. pw8753085

2006-05-24 Thread Theron Albright
Margarita, P2P Sports Betting Software May Change Casino Sports Betting VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - UBA Technology Inc. (UBTA), has entered into initial negotiations to install its proprietary betting exchange software in traditional land-based casinos. Read the whole story:

agree

2006-01-29 Thread Cord Beermann
Greetings from the Debian-Listmasters. We are still looking for a mailaddress which is forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] That Mailadress seems to respond to all postings to our Mailinglist debian-devel with a challenge-response reply. This mail is a test mailing, to check if this address is the

Can't we at least agree on Anti-Virus for our mail

2005-08-24 Thread Richard A Nelson
Just today 250+ viruses, mostly - clamd found the Worm.Mydoom.AT virus These are coming from master/gluck, and being a good citizen, I'm just dropping them on the floor (instead of creating backscatter). I know there's been heated debate about which, if any RBLs and other anti-spam tools to