Matt Zimmerman wrote:
That sounds backwards. Component is the one recognized by apt, and
(naturally) the one used by official Release files in the
Debian archive.
Components: updates/main updates/contrib updates/non-free [1]
... Adam
[1]
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:20:36PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
That sounds backwards. Component is the one recognized by apt, and
(naturally) the one used by official Release files in the
Debian archive.
Components: updates/main updates/contrib updates/non-free
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:48:24AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:20:36PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
That sounds backwards. Component is the one recognized by apt, and
(naturally) the one used by official Release files in the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:48:24AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:20:36PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
That sounds backwards. Component is the one recognized by
In looking to try and setup pinning on a couple of my machines I went
looking at the Release files for the various sites I use... For the most
part I found them to have a similar suite of attributes to work from but
I did notice a difference betwen Components and Component and just
trying
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:53:00PM -0700, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
In my looking I check'd out http.us.debian.org, debian.seabone.net and
security.debian.org... The IPv6 repository was the one in question that
used Component while the others used the plural version... Although
obviously
6 matches
Mail list logo