On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
Steve Langasek told:
[...]
There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possible to
convert all curl-using applications from OpenSSL to GNUTLS without a
recompile due to unavailable ABI changes, but I thought it was pretty clear
that
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
Steve Langasek told:
[...]
There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possible to
convert all curl-using applications from OpenSSL to GNUTLS without a
recompile
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
Paul TBBle Hampson told:
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
Steve Langasek told:
[...]
There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possible to
On Saturday 01 October 2005 02:49 pm, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
Paul TBBle Hampson told:
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
Steve Langasek told:
[...]
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:19:18PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:27:30PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Why is openssl the default?
I think everybody agrees that in the long period everybody will want
On Sep 30, Richard Atterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remain OpenSSL for the foreseeable future, GnuTLS is allegedly still
slightly more buggy than OpenSSL (does anyone have any details?) and is
lacking some features.
If you had taken some time to investigate these claims you would have
hi all,
i've just uploaded curl 7.14.1-3 to experimental, it should put curl
back in a good state. i also uploaded pycurl built using curl+gnutls.
to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
depend on libcurl3
On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
depend on libcurl3 (with openssl) or libcurl3-gnutls respectively.
Why is openssl the default?
I think everybody
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
depend on libcurl3 (with openssl) or
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
depend on libcurl3 (with openssl) or
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:31:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:03:26PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to build something with libcurl, one has to
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Why is openssl the default?
I think everybody agrees that in the long period everybody will want to
use gnutls,
No, as has been shown by the discussions in the last weeks, there is *no*
agreement on which SSL library should be the
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
That's actually not true, GnuTLS has the reverse licensing issues from
OpenSSL. OpenSSL cannot be linked with GPL-licensed software; GnuTLS,
OTOH, is licensed under the GPL (as opposed to the LGPL),
Only some extra features not present in OpenSSL (like SRP
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:03:26PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:27:30PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Why is openssl the default?
I think everybody agrees that in the long period everybody will want to
use gnutls,
No, as has been shown by the discussions in the
On Sep 30, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possible to
convert all curl-using applications from OpenSSL to GNUTLS without a
recompile due to unavailable ABI changes, but I thought it was pretty clear
that the default going
18 matches
Mail list logo
