Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
My proposal is still:
- Add a new priority essential for the must always be available
(so this is what in a bootstrap is unpackaged manually).
Require that Priority essential packages only depend on Priority
essential, so this is the new
* Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org [120131 20:53]:
Well, I would argue that packages in the essential set shouldn't be adding
new dependencies without some discussion and review on debian-devel first.
That's not technically required by policy, but pulling new packages into the
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:03:44AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
It's also a pity that it is not that easy to see which packages are in
this set. Given that transitively-essential means:
- the package must be unpackaged manually
- it must work without any preinst or postinst script being
* Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org [120201 12:32]:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:03:44AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
It's also a pity that it is not that easy to see which packages are in
this set. Given that transitively-essential means:
- the package must be unpackaged manually
- it
4 matches
Mail list logo
