-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-11-03 17:20, Russell Coker wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 23:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe we should solve the debate about grsec and standard kernels by
adding exec-shield to the standard Debian kernel source?
Go ahead and do it.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 21:29, cobaco wrote:
The exec-shield patch applies with the Debian patches and with LSM. I am
prepared to maintain it. Unless someone volunteers to maintain PaX
support for Debian kernels then the best available option for Debian
users will be exec-shield.
hm, the
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 07:42:27 -0500, spender [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Go ahead and do it. I could frankly care less if your users get
owned.
There's another exploitable bug in Exec-shield that I've known of
for months. Maybe you'll find it after you put it into Debian.
Maybe not. This
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:42:27AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go ahead and do it. I could frankly care less if your users get owned.
In that case it seems safer to avoid using any software you helped
to develop.
Richard Braakman
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 07:42:27AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's another
exploitable bug in Exec-shield that I've known of for months. Maybe
you'll find it after you put it into Debian. Maybe not.
Suddenly I don't feel inclined to believe *anything* this guy says.
--
.''`.
5 matches
Mail list logo
