On 24.3.2021 17.02, Harald Dunkel wrote:
On 3/24/21 2:49 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:33:53PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
So what would be your suggestion?
If you are still asking about getting this package into bullseye then I'm
afraid it's not possible.
Hi Harald,
Quoting Harald Dunkel (2021-03-24 16:02:17)
> On 3/24/21 2:49 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:33:53PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >> So what would be your suggestion?
> > If you are still asking about getting this package into bullseye
> > then I'm
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 04:02:17PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > If you are still asking about getting this package into bullseye then I'm
> > afraid it's not possible. Otherwise, as already suggested, it's possible
> > to have it in bullseye-backports after fixing problems keeping it outside
>
On 3/24/21 2:49 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:33:53PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
So what would be your suggestion?
If you are still asking about getting this package into bullseye then I'm
afraid it's not possible. Otherwise, as already suggested, it's possible
to
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:33:53PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > For my own part, I run freeipa-server on CentOS 7. I am not affected
> > > by #970880. I would be very happy with freeipa-client in Bullseye, even
> > > if freeipa-server doesn't make it.
> > The deadline for adding new packages
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 12:33:53PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 3/24/21 11:05 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:02:37AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > For my own part, I run freeipa-server on CentOS 7. I am not affected
> > > by #970880. I would be very happy with
On 3/24/21 11:05 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:02:37AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
For my own part, I run freeipa-server on CentOS 7. I am not affected
by #970880. I would be very happy with freeipa-client in Bullseye, even
if freeipa-server doesn't make it.
The
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 10:02:37AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I understand that freeipa-server has a very serious problem (#970880),
> making it unfit for Bullseye. It is *highly* painful that it puts
> freeipa-client at risk for the next release, too. We had something
> similar for Buster
Hi folks,
I understand that freeipa-server has a very serious problem (#970880),
making it unfit for Bullseye. It is *highly* painful that it puts
freeipa-client at risk for the next release, too. We had something
similar for Buster about 2 years ago, AFAIR.
For my own part, I run
9 matches
Mail list logo
