Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Right. I now found the 'official site' for the tool at
ftp://ftp.x86-64.org/pub/linux-x86_64/tools/linux32/
It's almost the same as your version, but we using the same
code as the others might be nice anyway. As a bonus, you
can run it as 'linux64'.
Just as a general
* Bob Proulx [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030708 18:19]:
It's almost the same as your version, but we using the same
code as the others might be nice anyway. As a bonus, you
can run it as 'linux64'.
Just as a general comment I dislike programs which change their
behavior based upon their name. If
@lists.debian.org; debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gcc on a biarch system
On Saturday 05 July 2003 19:44, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
On amd64, we currently have a biarch-gcc that builds 32bit binaries by
default, and 64bit ones with a -m64 option. Coding debian/rules for this
is pretty trivial
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030707 13:44]:
I've seen such an animal (that switches the personality and the
architecture reported by uname) in some distributions; it's called
linux32.
After Arnd's proposal, I wrote one for my own use, but now I am
curious...
Would there be a use
, July 07, 2003 11:07 AM
To: Miller, Marc; debian-x86-64@lists.debian.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-dpkg@lists.debian.org;
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: gcc on a biarch system
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030707 13:44]:
I've seen such an animal (that switches
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030707 14:41]:
Since other ISVs are adopting the use of linux32, I recommend
consistency here. AFAIK, the basic functions of linux32 are (1) to
change the architecture reported by uname, and (2) to adjust the
available address space for that process to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 July 2003 21:07, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
If I understand what linux32 does the program is quite trivial.
Right. I now found the 'official site' for the tool at
ftp://ftp.x86-64.org/pub/linux-x86_64/tools/linux32/
It's almost the same
* Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030707 15:22]:
On Monday 07 July 2003 21:07, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
If I understand what linux32 does the program is quite trivial.
Right. I now found the 'official site' for the tool at
ftp://ftp.x86-64.org/pub/linux-x86_64/tools/linux32/
It's
On amd64, we currently have a biarch-gcc that builds 32bit binaries by
default, and 64bit ones with a -m64 option. Coding debian/rules for this
is pretty trivial but still requires some ugly architecture specific
hacks in each debian/rules.
These hacks can be troublesome if the default compile
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 01:44:31PM -0400, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
I propose obtaining the gcc specific options from a dpkg-libinfo
(introduced by Gerhard Tonn's lib64 patches) or dpkg-architecture.
debian/rules can query for said options, and use them in order to build
for a given host
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 01:44:31PM -0400, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
On amd64, we currently have a biarch-gcc that builds 32bit binaries by
default, and 64bit ones with a -m64 option. Coding debian/rules for this
is pretty trivial but still requires some ugly architecture specific
hacks in each
On Saturday 05 July 2003 19:44, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
On amd64, we currently have a biarch-gcc that builds 32bit binaries by
default, and 64bit ones with a -m64 option. Coding debian/rules for this
is pretty trivial but still requires some ugly architecture specific
hacks in each
* Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030705 17:14]:
No, that's exactly the wrong way around. dpkg-libinfo (at least the
current proposal) uses dpkg-architecture to find the target
architecture and dpkg-architecture in turn calls gcc to get that.
It makes sense this way, although dpkg-libinfo
13 matches
Mail list logo
