Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How long should bugs be tagged pending in advance of an upload?
Is it acceptable to tag a bug pending when fixed upstream and the
maintainer is confident of an upstream release in under a week? (This
is easy for me, I'm also upstream in many cases.
How long should bugs be tagged pending in advance of an upload?
Is it acceptable to tag a bug pending when fixed upstream and the
maintainer is confident of an upstream release in under a week? (This
is easy for me, I'm also upstream in many cases. :-))
Does it depend on the severity of the bug?
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 12:50, Neil Williams wrote:
How long should bugs be tagged pending in advance of an upload?
For me pending is a signal to users saying issue has been confirmed,
solution is available and will be included with the next upload.
It would IMO not be correct to mark a bug
On Wednesday 16 May 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
How long should bugs be tagged pending in advance of an upload?
To me pending means, a fix is applied and will be in the next upload/release
(hence no further triaging needed on this bug).
It says nothing about when the upload with the fix will
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
How long should bugs be tagged pending in advance of an upload?
Time isn't the important metric, in my opinion. The question is
whether the maintainer has fixed the bug (or believes they have fixed
the bug) in their development environment and the fix
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How long should bugs be tagged pending in advance of an upload?
Is it acceptable to tag a bug pending when fixed upstream and the
maintainer is confident of an upstream release in under a week? (This
is easy for me, I'm also upstream in many cases. :-))
Frank Küster escreveu:
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How long should bugs be tagged pending in advance of an upload?
Is it acceptable to tag a bug pending when fixed upstream and the
maintainer is confident of an upstream release in under a week? (This
is easy for me, I'm also
On Wed, 16 May 2007 13:24:07 +0200
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 12:50, Neil Williams wrote:
How long should bugs be tagged pending in advance of an upload?
For me pending is a signal to users saying issue has been confirmed,
solution is available and will be
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Neil Williams wrote:
How long should bugs be tagged pending in advance of an upload?
Time isn't the important metric, in my opinion. The question is
whether the maintainer has fixed the bug (or believes they have fixed
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:24:07PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 12:50, Neil Williams wrote:
How long should bugs be tagged pending in advance of an upload?
For me pending is a signal to users saying issue has been confirmed,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 06:01:54AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Kevin Mark wrote:
would it be useful for some process to periodically poll the bts for
'pending' tags that are unusually old [ say 1 or 2 months ] and ping
the
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Kevin Mark wrote:
The other idea was for a simple .../pending page on the bts so that
folks could quickly see what is about to be fixed.
Just append ;pend-inc=pending-fixed; to your pkgreport.cgi url, like so:
12 matches
Mail list logo
