On 27 Apr 18:55, Noah Slater wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:48:50PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
I fully agree with this. I think having to remember which key one must
use in each context for reply is lame. This is why I do in my ~/.muttrc:
[...]
Where l/debian is the folder which
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:46:01AM +0100, Brett Parker wrote:
*boggle* - you claim to be on multiple lists and yet you don't use server side
filtering and folders?! OK - now that's just plain odd.
Neither do I, does that make me odd too? By all means comment on how I
or anyone elses uses lists,
Hi,
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
Interestingly you did it again, ignoring the list Code of Conduct.
As it sadly happens many times every day. And as long as there are no means to
enforce it (either pure social or aided by technology), it will continue to
happen.
regards,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:05:37PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
Interestingly you did it again, ignoring the list Code of Conduct.
As it sadly happens many times every day. And as long as there are no means to
enforce it (either pure social
Hi
Dne Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:39:15 +0100
Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org napsal(a):
* The Debian lists are the only lists I have ever come across that mandate,
or
even care, about such a thing. I have been on many lists in my time, and
my
current list of mailing list
Hi,
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
Interestingly you did it again, ignoring the list Code of Conduct.
As it sadly happens many times every day. And as long as there are no means
to
enforce it (either pure social or aided by technology), it will continue to
happen.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:39:15PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
* The Debian lists do not have a Reply-To header, meaning that by default my
email client wants to send replies to individual posters. To get the
mailing
list included in the reply means that I have to reply to all. It's a
Dear lazylist,
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
* The Debian lists do not have a Reply-To header,
does someone know why?
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:03:10PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
* The Debian lists do not have a Reply-To header,
does someone know why?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
* The Debian lists are the only lists I have ever come across that
mandate, or
even care, about such a thing. I have been on many lists in my time,
and my
current list of mailing list subscriptions stands at 73. On
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:06:01PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:03:10PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
* The Debian lists do not have a Reply-To header,
does someone know why?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
Definitely not the only one which mandates this.
Please list others so I can mock them.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi
Dne Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:33:06 +
Clint Adams sch...@debian.org napsal(a):
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:48:36PM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
Definitely not the only one which mandates this.
Please list others so I can mock them.
For example Mutt lists I mentioned. I saw the same rule in
Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 14:44 +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
If you're annoyed by cc:s (well, Holger, I know you are, you told me about
that
more than once :-) ), configure your mailclient to set Mail-Followup-To and
hope
for the next poster's mailclient to support that header. Which
+ Noah Slater (Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:10:17 +0100):
Yes, I know the L command, but thanks for pointing it out! My argument
is that I have to remember to use when I am replying to the Debian
lists
I fully agree with this. I think having to remember which key one must
use in each context for reply
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:48:50PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
I fully agree with this. I think having to remember which key one must
use in each context for reply is lame. This is why I do in my ~/.muttrc:
[...]
Where l/debian is the folder which contains Debian lists, and it allows
to always
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
C. Only supported by a handful of clients
A number of clients won't automatically generate the header, but may
still support it for group replies. I think this might include Evolution
and Thunderbid (although it was a while
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:16:08PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 27 avril 2009 à 14:44 +0200, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
If you're annoyed by cc:s (well, Holger, I know you are, you told me about
that
more than once :-) ), configure your mailclient to set Mail-Followup-To and
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 07:35:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98dec/I-D/draft-ietf-drums-mail-followup-to-00.txt
Perfectly well defined.
An interesting riposte for those arguing the opposite IETF angle.
If adherence to standards is so important, surely it's a
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:05 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Montag, 27. April 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
Interestingly you did it again, ignoring the list Code of Conduct.
As it sadly happens many times every day. And as long as there are no means
to
enforce it (either pure social
20 matches
Mail list logo
