On 17 Apr 2006, Christian Marillat spake thusly:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 16 Apr 2006, Christian Marillat uttered the following:
Here is the relevant policy :
, | Changes in the Debian version of the package should be
briefly explained in the Debian changelog
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 17 Apr 2006, Christian Marillat spake thusly:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
A copy and paste from the NEW file is certainly useless.
If the NEW file provides information relevant to an end user
reading the output
* Christian Marillat:
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
native package the upstream changelog should not be here.
Accoridng to Policy section 4.4, it's okay to list other changes
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Christian Marillat:
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
native package the upstream changelog should not be here.
Accoridng to Policy
* Christian Marillat:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Christian Marillat:
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
native package the upstream changelog should not be here.
Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: libgtk2.0-0
Version: 2.8.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.4
Hi,
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the
second time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package
isn't a native
* Russ Allbery:
Accordingly, for my packages, I mention (as sub-bullets to the * New
upstream release bullet) any upstream change that:
* Closes a Debian bug (and include the bug closer).
* Is a major feature enhancement or a major bug fix likely to be of
interest to a substantial
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Christian Marillat:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Where are you reading that ?
An upstream change is a change to the Debian package, too, and listing
them is expressly allowed under the other changes option.
I'm sorry but no.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Christian Marillat:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Where are you reading that ?
An upstream change is a change to the Debian package, too, and listing
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
R On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Christian Marillat:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Where are you reading that ?
An upstream change is a change to
Christian,
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006, Christian Marillat wrote:
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
native package the upstream changelog should not be here.
You're not in the
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian,
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006, Christian Marillat wrote:
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
native package the upstream changelog
Le dimanche 16 avril 2006 à 19:12 +0200, Christian Marillat a écrit :
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian,
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006, Christian Marillat wrote:
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
time I file the same bug report
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le dimanche 16 avril 2006 à 19:12 +0200, Christian Marillat a écrit :
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian,
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006, Christian Marillat wrote:
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s)
and to other interested parties to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL
Le dimanche 16 avril 2006 à 19:24 +0200, Christian Marillat a écrit :
You are wrong. I've orphaned all my GNOME packages with the right entry
in the Debian changelog. read again.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2004/03/msg01789.html
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Le dimanche 16 avril 2006 à 19:24 +0200, Christian Marillat a écrit :
You are wrong. I've orphaned all my GNOME packages with the right entry
in the Debian changelog. read again.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2004/03/msg01789.html
Le dimanche 16 avril 2006 à 19:48 +0200, Christian Marillat a écrit :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2004/03/msg01789.html
gnome-session (2.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Orphaned package.
-- Christian Marillat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:50:59 +0100
So,
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:22:14PM +0300, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Christian Marillat:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Where are you
On 16 Apr 2006, Christian Marillat uttered the following:
Here is the relevant policy :
, | Changes in the Debian version of the package should be
briefly explained in the Debian changelog file
`debian/changelog'.[1] This includes modifications made in the
Debian package compared to
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 16 Apr 2006, Christian Marillat uttered the following:
Here is the relevant policy :
, | Changes in the Debian version of the package should be
briefly explained in the Debian changelog file
`debian/changelog'.[1] This includes
Package: libgtk2.0-0
Version: 2.8.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.4
Hi,
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
native package the upstream changelog should not be here.
If
22 matches
Mail list logo
