Le jeudi 07 juillet 2005 à 13:04 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko a écrit :
Hello.
Are multiarch ideas alive?
Do they have any future in Debian?
I was going to ask the same question ;)
If we don't start the multiarch effort now, it won't be good for etch.
Are we postponing this to the next
Le Jeu 7 Juillet 2005 21:17, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le jeudi 07 juillet 2005 à 13:04 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko a
écrit :
Hello.
Are multiarch ideas alive?
Do they have any future in Debian?
I was going to ask the same question ;)
If we don't start the multiarch effort now
Le jeudi 07 juillet 2005 à 22:03 +0200, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
IMHO, either amd64/pure64/... will become a release arch and in that
case we have to have a solution for multiarch, either amd64 is not a
released arch .. and that bothers me.
The amd64 architecture is the least one affected
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:03:09PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Jeu 7 Juillet 2005 21:17, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
If we don't start the multiarch effort now, it won't be good for
etch. Are we postponing this to the next release?
I hope not ... I'm a quite happy owner of amd64
that much ;p)
Wouldn't you be better off with a native Oo.org rather than multiarch
in this case?
IMHO, either amd64/pure64/... will become a release arch and in that
case we have to have a solution for multiarch, either amd64 is not a
released arch .. and that bothers me
On Monday 14 March 2005 20:24, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If it weren't for sarge blocking us we would have submitted multiarch
patches as early as one year ago. Should we start submitting / NMUing
them for _experimental_ now to get this change running and tested? Or
should we keep waiting
Hello Siggy,
It seems your are the new maintainer of hwtools. Good :-))
I sent few weeks ago a request to enhance hwtools for multiarch support
(#58060).
In fact, I'm willing to use the scsi stuff on my sparc too (especially scsiinfo
scsidev). I succedeed to using it with really minor
901 - 907 of 907 matches
Mail list logo
