Re: new upstream version fails older tests of rdepends packages

2024-05-10 Thread Bill Allombert
Le Wed, May 08, 2024 at 08:41:47PM +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit : > Hi, > > On 08-05-2024 6:06 p.m., Bill Allombert wrote: > > Agreed, but gap does not actually breaks anything, it is just the tests > > in testing that are broken. So I can do that but that seems a bit > > artificial. > > Aha,

Re: new upstream version fails older tests of rdepends packages

2024-05-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 08-05-2024 6:06 p.m., Bill Allombert wrote: Agreed, but gap does not actually breaks anything, it is just the tests in testing that are broken. So I can do that but that seems a bit artificial. Aha, that wasn't at all clear to me. If you don't want to do the artificial thing (which is

Re: new upstream version fails older tests of rdepends packages

2024-05-08 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 03:21:12PM +, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Bill > > On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 13:58, Bill Allombert wrote: > > The problem is that all the debs in testing and sid are correct, it is the > > autopkgtest in > > testing which are wrong (they are relying on undocumented

Re: new upstream version fails older tests of rdepends packages

2024-05-08 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Bill On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 13:58, Bill Allombert wrote: > The problem is that all the debs in testing and sid are correct, it is the > autopkgtest in > testing which are wrong (they are relying on undocumented behaviour). > They are fixed in sid. I think an upload of gap, with Breaks on the

Re: new upstream version fails older tests of rdepends packages

2024-05-08 Thread Bill Allombert
Le Sat, May 04, 2024 at 02:32:22PM +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit : > Hi, > > On 04-05-2024 11:39 a.m., Jerome BENOIT wrote: > > What would be the best way to unblock the migration of gap and gap-io ? > > If gap isn't going to change (which might be the easiest solution), then > file bugs and fix

Re: new upstream version fails older tests of rdepends packages

2024-05-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 04-05-2024 11:39 a.m., Jerome BENOIT wrote: What would be the best way to unblock the migration of gap and gap-io ? If gap isn't going to change (which might be the easiest solution), then file bugs and fix those reverse dependencies. Those bugs are RC and in due time will cause

new upstream version fails older tests of rdepends packages

2024-05-04 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi, it appears that the packages gap [0] and gap-io [1] are blocked because some of their r-dependent packages (e.g., gap-factint) actually in testing fail one a their tests. The tests in question are similar and fail because the last version of gap adds now a trailing slash to path directories