On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:03:16 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
So policy-rc.d needs to be in /usr/local, or we have a FHS violation.
Please request that we enhance invoke-rc.d to look on /usr/local first,
then (through a wishlist
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:44:42 +1100, Matthew Palmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:15:52AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
I am not a native speaker, but to me it looks like your message
doesn't fit the questions I asked.
Steve answered your first question. The second question
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Marc Haber wrote:
So policy-rc.d needs to be in /usr/local, or we have a FHS violation.
Please request that we enhance invoke-rc.d to look on /usr/local first,
then (through a wishlist bug). Looks like a good idea at first glance.
Additionally, the requirement of going
Scripsit Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:44:42 +1100, Matthew Palmer
Steve answered your first question. The second question makes no sense,
since policy-rc.d is supposed to be written by the administrator to fit
their local policy.
So policy-rc.d needs to be in
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:32:02AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
So policy-rc.d needs to be in /usr/local, or we have a FHS violation.
Additionally, the requirement of going through the alternatives system
for policy-rc.d selection is somewhat mis-placed, because it suggests
to me that policy-rc.d
5 matches
Mail list logo
