Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-02-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 25/01/08 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386. - one in a perfectly clean chroot, as I usually do - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were installed (take the Sources file, extract the build-deps for all

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-02-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 05/02/2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, \o/ debcmp is an home-made script I use to compare packages, looking more deeply than what debdiff does. It's available from http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-qa/tools/debcmp/ , if you want

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-02-05 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! * Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080205 21:57]: I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read http://io.debian.net/ssh.html . If web access is enough, go to

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-02-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 05/02/2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote: Why that? Both, the diff.gz and the .dsc, are part of the source package, so why did they change at all? See the build log: , | gpg: Signature made Tue Jan 29 21:33:22 2008 CET using DSA key ID 00D8CD16 | gpg: Can't check signature: public key not

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-02-05 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:57:16PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 25/01/08 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read http://io.debian.net/ssh.html . If web

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-02-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/02/08 at 23:43 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:57:16PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 25/01/08 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the results are available on io.debian.net. If you want

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-02-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/02/08 at 23:32 +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote: Hi! * Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080205 21:57]: I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read http://io.debian.net/ssh.html . If web

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-28 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 28/01/2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Build-Conflicts: libwxgtk2.6-dev? I thought we were moving away from wx 2.4, not from 2.6. ;-) -- Cyril Brulebois pgpLO4s4mwjfE.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-28 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:23:09AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 27/01/08 at 12:47 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: trustedqsl build-depends(*) on libwxgtk2.4-dev, but your bdfh had libwxgtk2.6-dev installed as well. The bdfh build used the newer version, hence the binary dependencies were

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 27/01/08 at 12:47 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: trustedqsl build-depends(*) on libwxgtk2.4-dev, but your bdfh had libwxgtk2.6-dev installed as well. The bdfh build used the newer version, hence the binary dependencies were different. I'm not really sure how to solve this. The two

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 26/01/08 at 08:59 +, Roger Leigh wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I'm not really sure of what we should do about those problems. The easiest way to fix them is to use source-only uploads (to avoid packages built on broken maintainer machines),

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:20:47AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 26/01/08 at 08:59 +, Roger Leigh wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I'm not really sure of what we should do about those problems. The easiest way to fix them is to use

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-28 Thread Roger Leigh
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:20:47AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 26/01/08 at 08:59 +, Roger Leigh wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I'm not really sure of what we should do about those problems. The easiest way to fix them is to use

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-27 Thread Jens Peter Secher
On 25/01/2008, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386. [...] - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were installed (take the Sources file, extract the build-deps for all packages, and install as many packages as possible)

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-26 Thread Roger Leigh
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I'm not really sure of what we should do about those problems. The easiest way to fix them is to use source-only uploads (to avoid packages built on broken maintainer machines), and a better sbuild that can use lvm snapshots so

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-26 Thread Michael Biebl
Thanks for your efforts. - hal has been fixed in the pkg-utopia svn. - libnl-doc (different size) seems to be an issue of doxygen embedding the date of generation in the resulting html pages. I don't consider that a problem. - The fix for dbus is in the works. It's apparently the usage of the

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-26 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: 938 packages produced different binary packages according to debdiff. Of those, 477 produced different Depends line (caused by some features not being explicitely enabled, but not being explicitely disabled, usually). All the

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Of course, the list includes some false positives, but they are difficult to identify without going through all the debdiff outputs and build logs manually. Hmm, the debdiff output is not really helpful in deciding whether my

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 25/01/08 at 13:46 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Would it be possible to get access to the binaries? I'm interested in choose-mirror, localechooser, ikiwiki, libperl-critic-perl, and fbreader, which differed only in package size between the two builds. The host I stored them on isn't

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Joey Hess
Would it be possible to get access to the binaries? I'm interested in choose-mirror, localechooser, ikiwiki, libperl-critic-perl, and fbreader, which differed only in package size between the two builds. That's semi-understandable for choose-mirror, but I can't guess what would make the others

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 04:25:42PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 25/01/08 at 15:36 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: Hmm, the debdiff output is not really helpful in deciding whether my packages actually have a problem (doc-linux and libgpod). It just reports a different Installed-Size.

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 16:37 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: On 25/01/08 at 15:59 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: [docbok-xsl-doc-html] But if the size is the same, why would the Installed-Size differ? I have no idea. I've copied the source and the binary packages to

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 16:20 +0100 schrieb Jens Seidel: On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:59:01PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: [difference in Installed-Size for docbook-xsl-doc-html] copies files from the source to the correct place in the file system. So I checked the files: a) that I have

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 25/01/08 at 15:59 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 15:25 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386. - one in a perfectly clean chroot, as I usually do - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were installed

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Brett Parker
On 25 Jan 15:59, Daniel Leidert wrote: Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 15:25 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386. - one in a perfectly clean chroot, as I usually do - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were installed (take the

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 25/01/08 at 15:36 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:25:15PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Of course, the list includes some false positives, but they are difficult to identify without going through all the debdiff outputs and build logs manually. Hmm, the

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 15:25 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386. - one in a perfectly clean chroot, as I usually do - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were installed (take the Sources file, extract the build-deps for all

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
Michal Čihař wrote: Hi Dne Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:37:36 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a): Seems like gzip didn't compress the files in the exact same way, even if the resulting size was the same: $ diff -burN t t2 Binary files

rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386. - one in a perfectly clean chroot, as I usually do - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were installed (take the Sources file, extract the build-deps for all packages, and install as many packages as possible) (the chroot

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Jens Seidel
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 03:59:01PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 15:25 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386. - one in a perfectly clean chroot, as I usually do - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Lucas Nussbaum] I'm not really sure of what we should do about those problems. The easiest way to fix them is to use source-only uploads (to avoid packages built on broken maintainer machines), Very good work. I hope to find solutions for all my packages with this problem. I agree that

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Peter Makholm
Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Of course, the list includes some false positives, but they are difficult to identify without going through all the debdiff outputs and build logs manually. One false positive is when one of the builds fails, like ack-grep which fails some times due to

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi Dne Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:37:36 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a): Seems like gzip didn't compress the files in the exact same way, even if the resulting size was the same: $ diff -burN t t2 Binary files t/usr/share/doc/docbook-xsl-doc-html/changelog.Debian.gz and

Re: rebuilding the archive in a dirty chroot: results

2008-01-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 25/01/08 at 18:10 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 16:37 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: On 25/01/08 at 15:59 +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: [docbok-xsl-doc-html] But if the size is the same, why would the Installed-Size differ? I have no idea. I've copied the