On Monday 16 May 2005 23.27, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 16, Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels
up to 2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so
theoretically people could still be using it with current
I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels up to
2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so theoretically people
could still be using it with current kernels.
cc'ing debian-devel. If the consensus there is that the package should be
removed, I'll request
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 09:49:01AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels up to
2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so theoretically people
could still be using it with current kernels.
cc'ing debian-devel. If the
On May 16, Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure whether the ipfwadm package should be removed. Kernels up to
2.4 still have support for ipfwadm filtering rules, so theoretically people
could still be using it with current kernels.
Wait until sarge has been released and then
4 matches
Mail list logo
