so far not even a response telling me I'm in a queue.
Is the procedure described above still the right one?
DAM is very slow-moving these days. Probably they haven't looked at your
mail
yet.
Um, just in case anyone was wondering, that wasn't intended as a criticism of
DAM -- I think
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can we please fast-track this clairvoyant NM?
Umm... I belive that is the policy. He needs to have his email read, and
then answer a few questions.
The process for returning emeritus Developers is intentionaly much
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 10:22 -0500, Joe Smith wrote:
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can we please fast-track this clairvoyant NM?
Umm... I belive that is the policy. He needs to have his email read, and
then answer a few questions.
The process
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] over a week
ago, as described here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/02/msg3.html
so far not even a response telling me I'm in a queue.
Is the procedure described above still the right one?
DAM is very
* Nathanael Nerode [Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:42:35 -0500]:
Probably they haven't looked at your mail yet.
Can we please fast-track this clairvoyant NM?
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at
I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] over a week
ago, as described here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/02/msg3.html
so far not even a response telling me I'm in a queue.
Is the procedure described above still the right one?
Thanks,
Britton
--
Britton Kerin
[EMAIL
6 matches
Mail list logo
