Hi,
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA (missing
in action) is available only for DDs? The developers-reference.pdf tells to
use mia-query for this (chapter 7). But the command is on a Debian machine
which can
2007/10/16, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA (missing
in action) is available only for DDs? The developers-reference.pdf tells to
use mia-query for this (chapter 7). But
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
2007/10/16, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA
(missing
in action) is available only for DDs? The developers-reference.pdf
Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2007/10/16, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA
(missing
in action)
It's unlikely to change. If you need to make a query about a
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:44:39AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
2007/10/16, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA
(missing
in action) is available only for DDs? The
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:44:39 +0200, Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
2007/10/16, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA
(missing
in action) is available only for DDs?
2007/10/16, Ana Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I guess I'm being a bit the advocate of the Devil here, but isn't that
as invasive of their privacy as having direct access to the MIA
database? :P XD
No, a mia-query contains private information, stuff like: started a new job
promised work
Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] (16/10/2007):
Then, back to the original proposal, wouldn't it make sense to have a
public binary database stating if a person is MIA or not and just that
info? It might be quite useful to us, non-DDs, it won't invade
anyone's privacy and I don't think it would be
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 05:26:41PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
2007/10/16, Ana Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I guess I'm being a bit the advocate of the Devil here, but isn't that
as invasive of their privacy as having direct access to the MIA
database? :P XD
No, a mia-query contains
Hi
Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA (missing
in action) is available only for DDs? The developers-reference.pdf tells to
use mia-query for this (chapter 7). But the command is on a Debian machine
which can only be accesses by DDs. Can this be changed?
thanks
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 09:15:27PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Is there any reason why the database containing maintainers MIA (missing
in action) is available only for DDs? The developers-reference.pdf tells to
use mia-query for this (chapter 7). But the command is on a Debian
11 matches
Mail list logo
