Wichert Akkerman declaimed:
Previously Caleb Shay wrote:
I second this. For example, at the bottom of /etc/vim/vimrc there are
several lines commented out as they cause vim to behave a lot different
from regular vi. However, as was pointed out below, vim is NOT the
default vi when you
* Wichert Akkerman
| Previously David B Harris wrote:
| Well, what you're suggesting isn't really feasible ;)
|
| Someone actually did this a couple of years ago so it is feasible.
Run-time upgrading from RH to Debian is very much feasible and very,
very cool. No reboot required, even.
It
Debian.rpm would be very cool. And very portable!
system:~# alien --to-deb Debian.rpm ; dpkg --install Debian.deb
:)
David Graham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 6 January 2002 08:51, Egon Willighagen wrote:
On Saturday 5 January 2002 00:24, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
Wow, now that's really cool. What I'm wondering is, can apt-get,
dpkg, and friends recover this easily from a device overflow? Was
that thought of during their design and
On Saturday 5 January 2002 00:24, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
Wow, now that's really cool. What I'm wondering is, can apt-get,
dpkg, and friends recover this easily from a device overflow? Was
that thought of during their design and implementation? If it needs
a little more space in /var or
I'll start with the question(s) for the impatient. Is anyone
experiencing deadlocks between nfs-kernel-server and ext3? How about
symlink errors using nfs-user-server? There is nothing in the debian
bugs database about either of these problems. Nor is there anything
about the ext3 deadlock in
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 09:44:16AM +0900, YAEGASHI Takeshi wrote:
At Thu, 03 Jan 2002 21:07:33 -0700,
Matt Taggart wrote:
Is there anyone who utilize dpkg-cross?
I used it for bootstrapping Debian on hppa, it's *very* useful. I didn't
need
to make too many changes. I still need to
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 09:44:16AM +0900, YAEGASHI Takeshi wrote:
Yes, for embedded platforms with limited resources cross compling is
quite important, especially when you want to build a large set of
software such as Debian distrubution.
But as you know we currently have much troubule
Hey, buddy!! I ITA those packages a while back - I'll be uploading them in the
next day!!! PLEASE CHECK THE O LIST
__BEFORE__ YOU RETITLE A BUG!
- Adam
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:03:14PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 123477
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 09:15:41PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:37:46PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I agree completely. With our current testing setup this shouldn't be too
difficult to do.
It's already pretty split-up: we have base, we have standard, and we
Branden,
Nevermind. I just heard back from Samuel Hocevar and he is aware
of the problem and will fix it in the next build. I got thrown for
a loop because there was a crashing bug not fixed in vlc until 0.2.92-7
(which isn't in sid ppc yet) and local builds were failing (because
of
Branden,
I guess I'm just a tad thick here but I don't understand
the rational for the following conflict. My debian ppc sid
machine is current for all the packages in sid and has xlibs-pic
installed as well. I discovered that when I tried to do...
apt-get -b source vlc
for the latest
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 04:43:10PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Adam Majer
| clear.. For even a novice admin that is... After all, isn't admins
| or admin-wanna-bees what are installing a new system anyway? IMHO, I
| don't think that there is anything too cryptic being asked for
| desktop
On 01-Jan-02, 18:06 (CST), Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, vim is higher precedence than nvi.
Ack. That's no longer true. Sorry.
Steve
Hi,
I've been looking at ftp://archive.debian.org, ftp://nonus.debian.org
and other sites and I have not found nonus source packages for Debian
distributions older than slink (hamm, bo, etc.) (In fact, I have found
no packages at all).
Any idea about where can I find them?
Saludos,
Jesus.
[Sergio Rua]
I've a python script to autoconfigure X. It tries to configure
your X server using FrameBuffer. If it's not available, using
XFree -configure option detect and configure your X.
This sounds like a very good idea. How do you pass the configuration
information on
The current excuse for 'fam' in
URL:http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz is
- fam (- to 2.6.6.1-4)
* Maintainer: Joerg Wendland
* 16 days old (needed 10 days)
* fam/hppa unsatisfiable Depends: libstdc++3 (=
1:3.0.3-0pre011215) ['gcc-3.0']
* Valid
FILE 1
#include httpd.h
#include tcl.h
int main() {
struct stat foo;
printf(size of stat __pad1 is %d\n, sizeof(foo.__pad1));
}
FILE 2
#include tcl.h
#include httpd.h
int main() {
struct stat foo;
printf(size of stat __pad1 is %d\n, sizeof(foo.__pad1));
}
These produce
Hello!
On Sam, 05 Jan 2002, Robert Jördens produced 5,8K chars torturing the keyboard:
And: Did I reinvent the wheel?
I guess, I did.
It was:
30 Aug 2000 - 31 Aug 2000 (10 posts):
Crazy idea: removing version numbers from debian
But then: Lets bring it up again. My idea is much more far
Sorry if that has been asked before. I mistakenly deleted quite a bit of
Debian mail. I did check the archives for the past month though...
Whilst building my package, I get (from dpkg-dev 1.9.18, debhelper 3.0.51):
dh_builddeb
dpkg-deb: building package `libicu-dev' in
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 11:55:52PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Wichert Akkerman
| Previously Kevin Corry wrote:
| Could the ldconfig call be added to the top-level Makefile install
| target?
|
| No, since you might not be installing on a real system but a temporary
| location to
Hello!
I'm a little reluctant about speaking with this to this huge
blood-hungry crowd, since this is my first post and I'm starting right
out with something that will be either seen as totally stupid or totally
awesome. In short: this will polarize.
Debian-devel and linux-kernel are both
* Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20020105 19:54]:
Hey, buddy!! I ITA those packages a while back - I'll be uploading them in
the next day!!! PLEASE CHECK THE O LIST
__BEFORE__ YOU RETITLE A BUG!
Can you calm down and wrap your lines properly?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 09:29:34PM +0200, Juha Jäykkä wrote:
But is doesn't have an AltGr key...
I would say, AltGr is which ever key functions as Mode_switch. AltGr
just something printed on the key functioning as Mode_switch on some
keyboards. For example, I have CapsLock functioning as
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:54:16PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
You can now get POSIX online for free...
URL?
Subscribe at
http://www.opengroup.org/austin/
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Steve Greenland wrote:
If every system had up-to-date, standards-conforming
ctype.h support, we wouldn't have to worry much at all.
But even these days, pretty many systems with buggy macros
are still in use.
Then fix those systems. Pull the necessary stuff out of
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Egon Willighagen wrote:
...
That makes me wonder: is it possible that i am imagening things, and that the
upgrade went well, even though my HD was full? Did it actually install files
then, or did it not overwrite, because of the HD being full, and my files are
basically
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 11:19:30PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll start with the question(s) for the impatient. Is anyone
experiencing deadlocks between nfs-kernel-server and ext3? How about
symlink errors using nfs-user-server? There is nothing in the debian
bugs database about
I've noticed that Evolution (1.0-4) is very prone to report bad
signatures. To start with I thought it was down to use by the sender of
a particular mailer, but I am beginning to doubt that.
I checked signatures of 3 signed messages on the debian-devel list that
I have read this morning. 2 are
Hi
I was just thinking that it would be great to have something in apt-get
that get 'reinstall' or 'repaire' all packages installed on the system.
I don't think I am the only one who rm *'s a wrong dir sometimes, ;)
I think it's now real hard to reinstall every package installed ...
Greetz
Hi Tollef!
You wrote:
Then you are _very_ wrong. There are too many and too complicated
questions asked for a «normal user», whatever that is. You have to be
interested and/or have somebody help you install Debian, else you will
give up halfway.
Maybe we we should have two modes: a ``user
Hi elf!
You wrote:
I'll start with the question(s) for the impatient. Is anyone
experiencing deadlocks between nfs-kernel-server and ext3? How about
No, not at all. Using 2.4.17 on potato+bunk.
Starting back on the original project, the Etherboot finally succeeded
The next discovery was
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Adam Majer wrote:
Hey, buddy!! I ITA those packages a while back - I'll be uploading them in
the next day!!! PLEASE CHECK THE O LIST
__BEFORE__ YOU RETITLE A BUG!
Hi Adam,
it seems you misunderstood what Uwe was doing: He did only add the package
descriptions to the WNPP
[please CC me on replies]
Hi,
recently, the debian-devel-changes list is missing more .changes
messages than usual. I first suspected a local config change as the
culprit, but
URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2002/debian-devel-changes-200201/maillist.html
doesn't list what I
reopen 126856
severity 126856 serious
thanks
[cc'ing to debian-devel for comments.]
[please refer to bug 126856 for background info.]
also sprach Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.01.06.1016 +0100]:
Wrong. Read the documentation on the Flavours before using
it. This is the reason
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 03 Jan 2002, Craig Dickson wrote:
Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
If a package has gotten very stale, and nobody has taken up
maintainence, isn't that a pretty good indication that nobody is
using it anyhow?
Is it? Is the
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: debpartial
Version : 0+20020106.1
Author : Masato Taruishi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* License : GPL
Description : Debian Packages/Sources file partition tool
debpartial is a program
Moin!
We have also been invited by FOSDEM to attend this year's Free and
Open Source Developers Meeting taking place on February 16th and 17th
in Bruxelles. There are a lot of seminar rooms which can be used by
all participating projects and developers. If there are people from
Debian who would
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The current excuse for 'fam' in
URL:http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html.gz is
- fam (- to 2.6.6.1-4)
* Maintainer: Joerg Wendland
* 16 days old (needed 10 days)
* fam/hppa unsatisfiable Depends: libstdc++3 (=
Previously Paul Mackinney wrote:
What would be helpful is a README.Debian file in /usr/doc/vim that
alerts the user to the existence of /etc/vim/vimrc and its nice set of
potential customizations. I had overlooked the vim stuff in /etc, but I
have learned to check the /usr/doc directory.
Previously David N. Welton wrote:
I'm not sure exactly what problems this may cause, but I don't like
the looks of it... Interestingly (... or not) enough, that define
isn't created when building locally (version 1.3.23-dev)...
It doesn't cause any problems at all, it is by design.
Wichert.
Hi,
I'm trying to build gcc-3.0 manually because the autobuilder on m68k
just timeout on it. So all this takes gcc-3.0 as example, nothing
personal. This is more about improving the autobuilders.
Doing a test compile on i386 (way faster to check build-depends and
general errors there) I noticed
Hi all,
I mailed the maintainer of the above package on the eleventh of december and
haven't got a reply yet. All the bugs of the package are pretty old, a new
version of the proggy is also available upstream, current version is a year
old.
what should I do/can be done?
Uli
These packages have to be rebuilt for stable on i386 in order to let
the packages go into 2.2r5.
Please find URLs to source packages attached below for convenience.
When uploading, please take care of the distribution, which should
contain 'stable' and nothing else.
For further explanation
Package: glibc
Version: 2.2.4-7
Tags: patch
Hi,
It seems glibc source package is aware of cross compile, but I feel
current version is not very useful. I'm using dpkg-cross and applying
following patch to glibc.
* makerules.dpatch: Disable check for make -e. It checks $(PATH),
but
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 09:15:41PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 11:37:46PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
It's already pretty split-up: we have base, we have standard, and we
That's what I meant to say. The only think we don't have is the release of
base/standard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 04 January 2002 17:03, Daniel Stone wrote:
(BCC'ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
I will adopt the KDE packages, while Chris calc Cheney will take Qt, and
will also be the KDE3 maintainer when it comes around to it; by the time
KDE2.2 is phased
Egon Willighagen wrote:
That makes me wonder: is it possible that i am imagening things, and that the
upgrade went well, even though my HD was full? Did it actually install files
then, or did it not overwrite, because of the HD being full, and my files are
basically not upgraded, but just
Previously Yves Arrouye wrote:
any idea about what is happening? Why isn't ../icu_2.0-1.dsc found (when cat
complains)?
dpkg-source builds the .dsc file.
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left
Previously Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
mozilla_0.9.7-3_i386.changes(non-us)
openssh_3.0.2p1-2_i386.changes (non-us)
rsync_2.5.1-0.1_i386.changes
I did get those three.
I can dig up more if needed (counting only packages I have installed
I've found 15 today).
I suspect it's
Petter Reinholdtsen, on 2002-01-05, 22:49, you wrote:
* fam/hppa unsatisfiable Depends: libstdc++3 (=
1:3.0.3-0pre011215) ['gcc-3.0']
^^ see below...
Why is it still not included in Woody? Several kde and gnome packages
depend on this package,
On Sunday 06 January 2002 09:40 am, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
recently, the debian-devel-changes list is missing more .changes
messages than usual. I first suspected a local config change as the
culprit, but
There was a note yesterday on Debian Planet about a resource-exhaustion
problem on
I was just thinking that it would be great to have something in apt-get
that get 'reinstall' or 'repaire' all packages installed on the system.
I don't think I am the only one who rm *'s a wrong dir sometimes, ;)
I think it's now real hard to reinstall every package installed ...
well, if you
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 02:31:48PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
and maybe someone can suggest an alternative to flavours. i have about
27 systems for which i have kernel-images, using the flavour to specify
the machine name. this works beautifully. without the flavour, i would
not have the
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:44:23PM +0100, Michael De Nil wrote:
I was just thinking that it would be great to have something in apt-get
that get 'reinstall' or 'repaire' all packages installed on the system.
You can use apt-get --reinstall install list
There are a few possibilities to create
if i package spambouncer so that a configurable cronjob obtains updates
on the anti-spam rules and databases from the spambouncer website, then
the files can't remain in /usr, right?
the primary candidate for installation of spambouncer is
/usr/share/spambouncer, but /usr/lib/spambouncer might be
* Bas Zoetekouw
| You wrote:
|
| Then you are _very_ wrong. There are too many and too complicated
| questions asked for a «normal user», whatever that is. You have to be
| interested and/or have somebody help you install Debian, else you will
| give up halfway.
|
| Maybe we we should
Hm, I've already deleted the messages in question, but I know I always get
good signatures from Anthony Towns and Branden Robinson. I also believe I got
a good signature from that Michael Meskes message as well. In fact, I don't
think I've seen a bad signature. This is mutt 1.3.25-1, gnupg
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 11:56:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
But like I said, that wouldn't buy as anything: the *hardest* parts are
getting base and standard working properly, once they're done, it's not overly
Okay, good point.
Well, in a sense they don't: it's the fact that the core
Oliver Elphick (2002-01-05 20:53:08 +0100) :
[...]
Closes: 12166 121666 121699 121712 121944 122167 122871 123349 123950 124317
125772 126193 126440 127004 127275
Changes:
postgresql (7.1.3-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* postgresql: fix postgresql-dump so that it doesn't crash out
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Previously David N. Welton wrote:
I'm not sure exactly what problems this may cause, but I don't
like the looks of it... Interestingly (... or not) enough, that
define isn't created when building locally (version 1.3.23-dev)...
It doesn't
* Marcus Brinkmann
| Sure, evms seems only to be available on GNU/Linux, too. But just because
| it happens to work by chance it is no excuse to do the wrong thing. People
| might take it as an example and use it in their own software, where it
| doesn't work (on GNU/Hurd, and other systems).
* Michael De Nil
| I was just thinking that it would be great to have something in apt-get
| that get 'reinstall' or 'repaire' all packages installed on the system.
| I don't think I am the only one who rm *'s a wrong dir sometimes, ;)
| I think it's now real hard to reinstall every package
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:55:10PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
Actually, I don't think I've ever seen AltGr printed on a key, yet all the
keyboards in .hr have the right alt doing that.
It's standard on UK keyboards.
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever.
Ari Makela [EMAIL PROTECTED] dubitò:
aolme neither/aol. I must show my ignorance: I don't know what it
is.
¥ means yen, the Japanese currency.
--
Au revoir.
Lele...
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:34:53AM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
I mailed the maintainer of the above package on the eleventh of december
and haven't got a reply yet. All the bugs of the package are pretty old, a
new version of the proggy is also available upstream, current version is
a year
I mailed the maintainer of the above package on the eleventh of december and
haven't got a reply yet. All the bugs of the package are pretty old, a new
version of the proggy is also available upstream, current version is a year
old.
He is my applicant, and has a new version ready (with a
martin == martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
martin also sprach Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.01.06.1016
+0100]:
Wrong. Read the documentation on the Flavours before using
it. This is the reason that Flavours are deprecated, incidentally.
martin okay, i did read
[Ulrich Eckhardt]
Hi all,
I mailed the maintainer of the above package on the eleventh of
december and haven't got a reply yet. All the bugs of the package
are pretty old, a new version of the proggy is also available
upstream, current version is a year
old.
The same is the situation for
[Martin Schulze]
For further explanation please check the detailed report at
http://master.debian.org/~joey/2.2r5/.
libc6 is still not mentioned on this list. Is this on purpose, or did
someone forget to let you know?
There seem to be a security problem with the current potato/woody
glibc.
* (Martin Schulze)
|
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_0.1.9.1-1.potato1.dsc
|
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-utils_0.1.9.1-1.potato1.tar.gz
Built, test-installed and uploaded.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just
Oliver Elphick a écrit :
I've noticed that Evolution (1.0-4) is very prone to report bad
signatures. To start with I thought it was down to use by the sender of
a particular mailer, but I am beginning to doubt that.
[sneep]
Do other mail clients give similar results?
I have noticed the same
On 06-Jan-02, 04:55 (CST), Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to do this in a portable way so that it works on every system...
No, the people who want modern code to run on their systems need to
figure out how to support the standard. Why should every piece of
code contain the
Hi,
In packaging VTK I have come across some tools which address some of
the same things Goswin Brederlow brought up.
It turns out that developing a 3-D scientific data visualization
library is only part of the goals of the Visualization Tool Kit (VTK)
project. The other part is concerned with
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 01:34:53 +0100
Ulrich Eckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I mailed the maintainer of the above package on the eleventh of december and
haven't got a reply yet. All the bugs of the package are pretty old, a new
version of the proggy is also available upstream,
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Could you elaborate ?
Uninstalled pentium-builder, and debian/rules build still aborted (could
not find cc?).
Tried to figure how cc could not be referenced correctly (symlinks
seemed OK, but would not work when called by debian/rules build). Long
story short, I removed
Hi Adam,
it seems you misunderstood what Uwe was doing: He did only add the package
descriptions to the WNPP bugs, IOW he changed e.g.
ITA: gtml
to
ITA: gtml -- An HTML pre-processor
or
O: wmf
to
O: wmf -- Web Mail Folder
These changes are visible e.g. in the wookly
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002 00:27, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
I think you can probably boot to it with a carefully crafted initrd
that performs a pivot_root into the debootstrapped chroot.
I believe that pivot_root only works on mounted file systems, so unless your
chroot environment is at the root
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 06:05:26PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Michael De Nil
| I was just thinking that it would be great to have something in apt-get
| that get 'reinstall' or 'repaire' all packages installed on the system.
| I don't think I am the only one who rm *'s a wrong dir
Try sending email to QA or something. Maybe they should orphan the package
owned by that maintainer.
- Adam
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:34:53AM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
I mailed the maintainer of the above package on the eleventh of december and
haven't got a reply yet. All the bugs of
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 10:26:11PM -0800, Yves Arrouye wrote:
Sorry if that has been asked before. I mistakenly deleted quite a bit of
Debian mail. I did check the archives for the past month though...
Whilst building my package, I get (from dpkg-dev 1.9.18, debhelper 3.0.51):
What command
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:59:55PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Marcus Brinkmann
| Sure, evms seems only to be available on GNU/Linux, too. But just
because | it happens to work by chance it is no excuse to do the wrong
thing. People | might take it as an example and use it in their
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:31:28PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
if i package spambouncer so that a configurable cronjob obtains updates
on the anti-spam rules and databases from the spambouncer website, then
the files can't remain in /usr, right?
the primary candidate for installation of
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:44:23PM +0100, Michael De Nil wrote:
I was just thinking that it would be great to have something in apt-get
that get 'reinstall' or 'repaire' all packages installed on the system.
I don't think I am the only one who rm *'s a wrong dir sometimes, ;)
I think it's now
Hello!
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Oliver Elphick a écrit :
I've noticed that Evolution (1.0-4) is very prone to report bad
signatures. To start with I thought it was down to use by the sender of
a particular mailer, but I am beginning to doubt that.
[sneep]
Do other
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 07:54:31PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
Hey, buddy!! I ITA those packages a while back - I'll be uploading
them in the next day!!! PLEASE CHECK THE O LIST
__BEFORE__ YOU RETITLE A BUG!
Please calm down. I was not trying to adopt these packages or anything.
I was only
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:31:28PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
if i package spambouncer so that a configurable cronjob obtains updates
on the anti-spam rules and databases from the spambouncer website, then
the files can't remain in /usr, right?
Are you sure you want to do this? What about
On Sun, 2002-01-06 at 06:38, Oliver Elphick wrote:
I've noticed that Evolution (1.0-4) is very prone to report bad
signatures. To start with I thought it was down to use by the sender of
a particular mailer, but I am beginning to doubt that.
This is a known bug in Evolution: see
I was just thinking that it would be great to have something in apt-get
that get 'reinstall' or 'repaire' all packages installed on the system.
I don't think I am the only one who rm *'s a wrong dir sometimes, ;)
I think it's now real hard to reinstall every package installed ...
You could
Previously David N. Welton wrote:
I don't think it's right that two pieces of software can declare the
same struct and have them come out different things... there's
something wrong.
Bogus, if you compile them with the same options then will the the
same. If you compile one with LFS and one
On Sun, 2002-01-06 at 12:05, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
dpkg -l | awk '/^i/ {print $2}' |xargs apt-get --reinstall install
dpkg --get-selections | egrep '[[:space:]]install$' | cut -f 1 | xargs apt-get
install --reinstall
Egon Willighagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbagliò:
Actually, i have just read a debian-kde message about the PNG
problem...
That seems to be a KDE specific problem.
Yes, it is due to the problem about libpng.
Apt is completely innocent. :-)
--
Au revoir.
Lele...
* (Jacob Elder)
| On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 06:05:26PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| dpkg -l | awk '/^i/ {print $2}' |xargs apt-get --reinstall install
|
| should work.
|
| Not unless every package name is 16 characters.
COLUMNS=300 dpkg -l | awk '/^i/ {print $2}' |xargs apt-get
Whilst building my package, I get (from dpkg-dev 1.9.18, debhelper
3.0.51):
What command did you run to do this? What you probably meant was
dpkg-buildpackage.
I did use dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
Here's more of the log:
if test -d build -a build != source; then rm -f -r build; fi
* Matt Zimmerman
| If portability is an issue, the software in question should be using libtool
| anyway, which takes care of this for you. If it will only ever work on
| GNU/Linux, ldconfig -n with an explanatory comment should be sufficient.
Example from where I've used ldconfig -n:
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Previously David N. Welton wrote:
I don't think it's right that two pieces of software can declare
the same struct and have them come out different things... there's
something wrong.
Bogus, if you compile them with the same options then will
Has anyone managed to get guppi to work in current sid?
I have yet to have any success. Before today guppi would
silently fail whereas today I get a crash in guppi-gnumeric.
I am trying the following...
1) run gnumeric
2) enter two columns of three rows of numbers (1,2,3 and 2,4,6)
3) select
On Sun, 2002-01-06 at 16:59, Roland Mas wrote:
Oliver Elphick (2002-01-05 20:53:08 +0100) :
Closes: 12166 121666 121699 121712 121944 122167 122871 123349 123950
124317 125772 126193 126440 127004 127275
Changes:
postgresql (7.1.3-6) unstable; urgency=low
.
* postgresql: fix
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 02:04:53PM -0800, Yves Arrouye wrote:
Whilst building my package, I get (from dpkg-dev 1.9.18, debhelper
3.0.51):
What command did you run to do this? What you probably meant was
dpkg-buildpackage.
I did use dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
Here's more of
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
