Margarita Manterola wrote:
One of the us mirrors is not working properly. It's been faulty for
at least a week.
The mirror is: 204.152.191.7 (mirrors1.kernel.org)
To whoever might be in charge of this, it should be removed from the
rotation of both http.us.debian.org and
Hi,
Adeodato Depends: foo (= 0.8), foo ( 0.9~)
Can I assume that the first one will accept version 0.9~rc1, but the
second one wont?
You're right. The empty string at the end of '0.9~' counts as zero in
lexical comparison. Thus 0.8 0.9~ 0.9~rc1.
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
Sebastian
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 319 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 84 (new: 3)
Total number of packages
hi,
there's related thread on debian-devel mailing list, please look at Etch
artwork subject. There's also a cross posting message on
debian-qt-kde, debian-gtk-gnome and pkg-xfce-devel, look at Debian sid and
etch artwork.
An entry on the wiki : http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDesktopArtwork
also sprach Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.0012 +0100]:
1.) Wait for a 0.10 release. I think my users wouldn't be happy ;-)
Why not continue to current versioning scheme until 0.10 is out to
avoid the epoch?
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
* Michael Biebl:
So, what should I do now:
1.) Wait for a 0.10 release. I think my users wouldn't be happy ;-)
2.) Use an epoch.
3.) File a bug report against dpkg.
2) is the typical approach.
If it's not a bug in dpkg, could someone please elaborate on the
reasoning of this behaviour.
.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:30:45AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.0012 +0100]:
1.) Wait for a 0.10 release. I think my users wouldn't be happy ;-)
Why not continue to current versioning scheme until 0.10 is out to
avoid the epoch?
Yeah
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 02:21:04AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Roberto C. Sanchez [Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:47:36 -0400]:
Except that the final comparison ignores that the number was to
the right of the decimal, making the zero significant.
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
. is not special as far as version numbers are concerned. It's not
a separator, for instance, and 1. is a valid version number (which
is equal to 1.0).
That doesn't match my reading of Policy 5.6.12:
The strings are compared from left to right.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 07:17:43AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
. is not special as far as version numbers are concerned. It's not
a separator, for instance, and 1. is a valid version number (which
is equal to 1.0).
Uhm, where does the 0 come from? This is grossly unintuitive, and I would
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 02:59:16PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
The second query is trying to find out all the groups root is in (is
it possible to skip this???).
Only if you either remove ldap from the groups: line in nsswitch.conf,
or you do not use any programs that call initgroups()/getgrent().
also sprach Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.0931 +0100]:
Uhm, where does the 0 come from? This is grossly unintuitive, and I would
consider this a bug. Both strings parse as follows:
1. = , 1, .
1.0 = , 1, ., 0
actually, you forgot the trailing
And another bug: 2a.0 is
pe, 2006-08-11 kello 09:47 +0100, martin f krafft kirjoitti:
also sprach Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.0931 +0100]:
Uhm, where does the 0 come from? This is grossly unintuitive, and I would
consider this a bug. Both strings parse as follows:
1. = , 1, .
1.0 = , 1, ., 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Aug 10, Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
installed, all using the same configuration file. Is this a use
case we really want to support? Are there really setups running
multiple inetds for a good reason? Having a virtual
A good reason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
It would be good to get rid of inetd from the basic install at all. Those
No, it would not. UNIX systems are supposed to have an inetd installed.
I see no reason why *Debian* systems should have an inetd installed
unless there is another package
pe, 2006-08-11 kello 14:42 +1000, Brian May kirjoitti:
Can the argument be made that these aren't packaging bugs but rather
the fact the hostname hasn't been configured correctly?
Not only can that argument be made, but I would like to make it myself.
I'll fix the chroot piuparts uses so that
ke, 2006-08-09 kello 10:21 +0300, Lars Wirzenius kirjoitti:
While I wait to have time to do something better and more easily usable,
the following page lists the logs of failed piuparts files that have not
yet been processed:
http://piuparts.cs.helsinki.fi/fail/
I made some more logs
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:46:44AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
Now, let's see what depends on *-inetd:
Depends:
netbase
Hence, everything that wants an inetd can just Depend: on netbase, rather
than specifying it explicitly, so your list is incomplete:
lukemftpd
Bruce Sass writes (Re: Silly Packaging Problem):
files and size accommodate the desire to include generated or
packageless files and their size (if knowable) in the dpkg DB.
This is a bad idea. dpkg maintains these lists of files not primarily
for the purpose of dpkg -S, but rather for making
Hi all,
(I posted this to debian-user yesterday but got no bites. I'm hoping to
have more luck with the debian-devel group.)
From the Debian FAQ 8.5:
If you'd like to log all your dpkg invokations (even those done using
frontends like aptitude), you could add
log /var/log/dpkg.log
also sprach peek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.1210 +0100]:
How is this really supposed to work? (And why does it say Success
when it exits with an error? Success at generating an error?)
Btw, I'm running Sarge.
log support was added to dpkg post-sarge
--
Please do not send copies of
Failed to fetch
http://ftp.ie.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
MD5Sum mismatch
I am seeing a lot of this stuff lately, and I've been told it's due
to mirror syncs. As our archive grows bigger, the sync takes longer,
so this problem will happen more often in the future.
I
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach peek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.1210 +0100]:
How is this really supposed to work? (And why does it say Success
when it exits with an error? Success at generating an error?)
Btw, I'm running Sarge.
log support was added to dpkg post-sarge
* Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060811 01:13]:
If it's not a bug in dpkg, could someone please elaborate on the
reasoning of this behaviour. I'd be grateful for any comments and replies.
That's because dpkg follows the most common versioning scheme:
The version after 0.9 is called 0.10.
also sprach martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.1222 +0100]:
Shouldn't we switch to using/advocating a smarter algorithm like
the one debmirror or anonftpsync use, which is to push new package
files to the archive, then synchronise indices, then delete obsolete
package files?
sorry
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 09:47:33AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.0931 +0100]:
And another bug: 2a.0 is _lesser_ than 2.0! This works as
documented, but is totally against lexicography, expectations and
common sense.
I'll shoot
also sprach Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.1339 +0100]:
1.0.6
1.0.6a (a few hours later, with a brown-paper bug fixed)
1.0.7
This is totally okay in my book as the letter is at the end. :)
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`.
* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Aug 11, Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why, for the love of Cthulhu, does netbase depend on inetd in the first
place? Let's see:
Historical reasons.
Not good enough. Not even close.
It would be good to get rid of inetd from the basic
Michael Biebl writes (dpkg doing wrong math (0.09 = 0.9) ?- [was: dak now
supports ~ in version numbers]):
Reading this announcement I thought, great and wanted to start using
'~', only to discover that dpkg believes that 0.09+0.1.svn 0.1~svn.
1.) Wait for a 0.10 release. I think my users
Dear dd's,
I just found an invitation for a debian-edu bug squashing party at
central Germany [1]. As this is quite a distance from where I live, I
probably won't make it myself - but will try to join the team via IRC
(#debian-edu). Now I wonder, if there is more folks around who might be
Hello Rudi,
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 15:35 +0200, Rudi Effe wrote:
I just found an invitation for a debian-edu bug squashing party at
central Germany [1]. As this is quite a distance from where I live, I
probably won't make it myself - but will try to join the team via IRC
(#debian-edu). Now
Hi all!
Once again, after I reviewed the outstanding bugs list, I intended
to package the new upstream version of mantis and to fix some bugs,
at least those I was able to ;)
The files:
http://knabl.com/~daniel/mantis/mantis_0.19.4-4.0.diff.gz
Hi
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:37:28 +0200
Daniel Knabl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once again, after I reviewed the outstanding bugs list, I intended
to package the new upstream version of mantis and to fix some bugs,
at least those I was able to ;)
0.19.4 is new upstream version? And what happened
Am Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:37:28 +0200 schrieb Daniel Knabl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The files:
http://knabl.com/~daniel/mantis/mantis_0.19.4-4.0.diff.gz
http://knabl.com/~daniel/mantis/mantis_0.19.4-4.0.dsc
http://knabl.com/~daniel/mantis/mantis_0.19.4-4.0_all.deb
Bruce Sass a écrit :
I will be so bold as to suggest...
Synopsis: update-package [options] command package
update-package [options] --add-files=paths package
update-package [options] --remove-files=paths package
update-package [options] --size=absolute | [+|-]increment package
On 10742 March 1977, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Reply-To and M-f-T set to my address, whoever answers please respect
this and let this thread die on -devel, its the wrong medium for this
discussion, thank you.
I am sorry, but I cannot believe that you like to make serious proposal
with the text
Daniel Knabl wrote:
If my work is welcome - as I hope - then I will try to go on with
it. If it is NOT, or if it is of too low quality, then just ignore my
tries.
The quality is not really a big issue here, it can be improved with
time. What I would like to see is some degree of commitment
Brian May a écrit :
So that probably would explain why I can no longer log in as root when
the NSS LDAP server is down, even with LDAP PAM support disabled and
files is listed before ldap in /etc/nsswitch.conf.
I run in a similar problem a few days ago.
I misconfigured /etc/nsswitch.conf by
On 10743 March 1977, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
[1]
http://debian-meetings.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2006/debconf6/theora-small/2006-05-14/tower/OpenSolaris_Java_and_Debian-Simon_Phipps__Alvaro_Lopez_Ortega.ogg
[2]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco Bertorello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: furl
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Kidney Bingos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.gumbynet.org.uk/software/furl.html
* License : GPL v2 (or later)
Programming
Hi!
* martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060811 13:22]:
Shouldn't we switch to using/advocating a smarter algorithm like
the one debmirror or anonftpsync use, which is to push new package
files to the archive, then synchronise indices, then delete obsolete
package files?
We used something
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 06:35:42PM +0200, Marco Bertorello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marco Bertorello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: furl
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Kidney Bingos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Hi again,
No matter, if I will ever be on the right level, I WILL continue to
try making contibutions. Please keep in mind, that I just want to
contribute, and I do NOT intend to become the new maintainer for
mantis. If there are people around, that can do this work in a better
way, then
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10742 March 1977, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Reply-To and M-f-T set to my address, whoever answers please respect
this and let this thread die on -devel, its the wrong medium for this
discussion, thank you.
If we did agree on continuing the mail
Hi Daniel,
I see you made a great job out of mantis. You are so enthusiastic that
I could not make you wait. There are still some issues that I want to
discuss with you (ie, the changelog should be improved).
But let's take this off-list and talk in private.
--
·''`. Policy is
Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
It would be good to get rid of inetd from the basic install at all. Those
No, it would not. UNIX systems are supposed to have an inetd installed.
I see no reason why *Debian* systems should have an inetd
On 10743 March 1977, Joerg Schilling wrote:
If we did agree on continuing the mail exchange on a private base, there
youle be not problem, but unfortunately, you did send some lies in your mail
that need to be corrected first
Yeah.
Eduard Bloch has absolutely no clue and on the other
reassign 377109 ftp.debian.org
retitle 377109 RM: cdrtools -- RoM: non-free, license problems
thanks
Hi guys,
ok well, as JS stays with an interpretation of CDDL and GPL that the
whole world does not follow (all wrong, of course :) ), lets go and fix
this. The sane way is to remove cdrtools from
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10743 March 1977, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
[1]
http://debian-meetings.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2006/debconf6/theora-small/2006-05-14/tower/OpenSolaris_Java_and_Debian-Simon_Phipps__Alvaro_Lopez_Ortega.ogg
[2]
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eduard Bloch has absolutely no clue and on the other side implicitely
claims
in his arrogant habbit that he knows more about cdrtools than I do. This
makes
it impussoble to cooperate with him.
You know that this is Rufschädigung übelster
On Friday 11 August 2006 14:48 pm, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The FSF GPL FAQ e.g. incorrectly claims:
Linking ABC statically or dynamically with other modules is making a
combined work based on ABC. Thus, the terms and conditions of the GNU
General Public License cover the
In reply to a RFP, and with the idea of creating subtitles for the talks given
in Spanish during Debian Day at Debconf6, found at
http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2006/debconf6/theora-small/2006-05-13/tower/
I intend to package subtitleeditor.
* Package name:
Alle Friday 11 August 2006 22:51, Joerg Jaspert ha scritto:
reassign 377109 ftp.debian.org
retitle 377109 RM: cdrtools -- RoM: non-free, license problems
thanks
Hi guys,
ok well, as JS stays with an interpretation of CDDL and GPL that the
whole world does not follow (all wrong, of course
Jorg Schilling wrote:
[...]
Sorry, but I do not believe people that put things into a GPL FAQ that
are obviously wrong. Let me give a single example to avoid wasting too
much time:
The FSF GPL FAQ e.g. incorrectly claims:
Linking ABC statically or dynamically with other modules is
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
also sprach Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1647 +0100]:
How about allowing conffiles to list files that are generated at
install time and are not included in the deb?
You can, but then you run up against policy. You are not
Bruce Sass [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu August 10 2006 10:16, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.10.1647 +0100]:
How about allowing conffiles to list files that are generated at
install time and are not included in the deb?
You can,
Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, but the combined work (A+B) (i.e. a binary produced by linking
module A with module B) is a work based on A, and hence (A+B) must be
distributable under the terms of the GPL.
Distributing the sources of A with the sources of B may be fine, but
Hi,
today I searched for a specific DSA and its really pain if
you just know the package but no DSA number (correct me if I missed
something).
What about a search field on [0]
to search the DSA database for past DSAs against a package?
The regular search on d.o is not able to find DSAs.
Kind
also sprach Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.2302 +0100]:
today I searched for a specific DSA and its really pain if
you just know the package but no DSA number (correct me if I missed
something).
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=q=dsa123+debianbtnG=Search
--
Please do not send
Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let's put aside for the moment that the FAQ is not meant to be a legal
document as opposed to the GPL itself, and that the FAQ is not saying B would
be a derived work of A, but rather that the combination would be...
I have a general question about
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:29:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Michael Biebl [Fri, 11 Aug 2006 01:12:59 +0200]:
that dpkg --compare-versions '0.09' '=' '0.9' yields true, which I
think is rather odd, because it means that now all version
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Failed to fetch
http://ftp.ie.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz
MD5Sum mismatch
I am seeing a lot of this stuff lately, and I've been told it's due
to mirror syncs. As our archive grows bigger, the sync takes longer,
so this
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
reassign 377109 ftp.debian.org
retitle 377109 RM: cdrtools -- RoM: non-free, license problems
thanks
Hi guys,
ok well, as JS stays with an interpretation of CDDL and GPL that the
whole world does not follow (all wrong, of course :) ), lets go and
Amaya Rodrigo Sastre wrote:
This program also shows soundwaves which makes it easier for
subtitles synchronisation that most other subtitle editors like
ksubtile or gaupol.
So, now that I read this aloud, is it that or than here?
Nah, the description should
You did write:
...
I have a general question about how the GPL is construed to cover the case of
dynamic linking. According to the GPL, section 0:
...
I am sory to see that you did remove me from the Cc: list
you are the first person at Debian who starts to think the right
way...
If you
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 23:55 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Linking a GPLd program against a non-GPLd library does not make the library a
derived work of the GPLd program.
but it does mean you may distribute the resulting binary only if you make the
library
source available under the GPL, and if
also sprach Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.2326 +0100]:
The algorithm used is 2pass. First pass only mirrors pool while the
second pass mirrors the Release and Packages files. The time a mirror
is out of sync should always be limited to the time it takes to
download the
Hi,
* martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-12 00:50]:
also sprach Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.08.11.2302 +0100]:
today I searched for a specific DSA and its really pain if
you just know the package but no DSA number (correct me if I missed
something).
Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Except that the final comparison ignores that the number was to the
right of the decimal, making the zero significant.
A '.' character in a version string isn't a decimal point. The
prevalence of versions strings containing more than one '.'
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 07:04:51PM -0400, Edward Allcutt wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 23:55 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Your discussion is off-topic for debian-devel, please kindly take it
elsewhere.
Thanks,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 23:25:52 +0200, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hubert Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, but the combined work (A+B) (i.e. a binary produced by linking
module A with module B) is a work based on A, and hence (A+B) must
be distributable under the terms of the GPL.
On Friday 11 August 2006 18:10 pm, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I believe that the totaly interchangable option of specifying
-static or not should not change the free-ness of the source or
resulting binary. So if you link static and you agree that it is a
violation that way then you should not
Roberto == Roberto C Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Roberto However, the cyrus init script is called
Roberto /etc/init.d/cyrus21, the courier init script is
Roberto /etc/init.d/courier-imap and the dovecot init script is
Roberto /etc/init.d/dovecot. It would seem to me that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:41:14 -0300
Source: raster3d
Binary: raster3d raster3d-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 2.7d-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nelson A. de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Nelson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:06:40 -0400
Source: cl-launch
Binary: cl-launch
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.85-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Francois-Rene Rideau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Francois-Rene Rideau
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:03:27 +1000
Source: libxi
Binary: libxi-dev libxi6-dbg libxi6
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:58:26 +0200
Source: pycurl
Binary: python-pycurl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 7.15.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Domenico Andreoli [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 03:33:07 +0900
Source: kazehakase
Binary: kazehakase
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Hidetaka Iwai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Hidetaka Iwai [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:49:59 +0200
Source: manpages
Binary: manpages manpages-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.38-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin Schulze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:33:48 +0200
Source: discover-data
Binary: discover-data-udeb discover-data
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2006.08.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:40:06 +0900
Source: libjcode-pm-perl
Binary: libjcode-pm-perl
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.06-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Atsushi KAMOSHIDA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Atsushi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:14:12 +0200
Source: cthugha
Binary: cthugha
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:28:14 +0100
Source: bibledit
Binary: bibledit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Glassey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Glassey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:50:07 +0200
Source: br.ispell
Binary: wbrazilian ibrazilian myspell-pt-br brazilian-conjugate aspell-pt-br
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 3.0~beta4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rafael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:05:06 +0200
Source: offlineimap
Binary: offlineimap
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.0.13-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:24:38 +0200
Source: libphidgets
Binary: python-phidgets libphidgets-dev libphidgets0
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.3.8-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:27:25 +0200
Source: glpk-shlib
Binary: libglpk0
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:24:58 +0200
Source: cdebconf
Binary: cdebconf-slang-udeb libdebconfclient0 cdebconf-priority cdebconf
libdebconfclient0-dev cdebconf-udeb libdebconfclient0-udeb cdebconf-gtk-udeb
cdebconf-text-udeb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:23:29 +0200
Source: rootskel-gtk
Binary: rootskel-gtk
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.09
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 21:22:21 -0500
Source: libselinux
Binary: libselinux1-dev selinux-utils libselinux1 python-selinux
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.30.22-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:10:38 +0200
Source: gmime2.2
Binary: libgmime2.2-cil libgmime-2.0-2-doc libgmime-2.0-2 libgmime-2.0-2-dev
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Guus Sliepen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:43:19 -0500
Source: subversion
Binary: libsvn1 libsvn-perl libsvn-doc libsvn-dev libsvn-ruby libapache2-svn
libsvn-ruby1.8 libsvn-java python-subversion subversion-tools subversion
Architecture: source all i386
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:31:25 +0200
Source: docbook-xsl
Binary: docbook-xsl docbook-xsl-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.70.1.dfsg.1-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 22:13:36 -0500
Source: quixote1
Binary: quixote1-doc python-quixote1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 23:43:00 +0200
Source: grip
Binary: grip
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.3.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:08:12 +0200
Source: gcj-4.1
Binary: libgcj-doc lib64gcj7-0 lib32gcj-bc lib32gcj7-dev libgcj-bc libgcj7-awt
libgcj7-0 lib64gcj-bc libgcj-common libgcj7-jar gij-4.1 gappletviewer-4.1
libgcj7-dev libgcj7-src
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:50:59 +0200
Source: blender
Binary: blender
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.42a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Blender Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Ernst [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:44:58 +0200
Source: emacs-snapshot
Binary: emacs-snapshot-el emacs-snapshot-bin-common emacs-snapshot-nox
emacs-snapshot emacs-snapshot-common emacs-snapshot-gtk
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:20060811
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:27:31 +0100
Source: mod-bt
Binary: libbtutil0-dev libbttracker-utils libbttracker0 libapache2-mod-bt
libbttracker0-dev php5-apache2-mod-bt libbtutil-utils libbtutil0
php4-apache2-mod-bt libapache2-mod-bt-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:11:26 +0200
Source: lyx
Binary: lyx-qt lyx-common lyx-xforms lyx
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.4.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian LyX Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
