Re: moving mutt-i from non-us to main

1998-10-18 Thread john
Bart Schuller writes: Has anything changed since then, or do we have a too short collective memory? I had always assumed that everything in non-us contained encryption code, as do the few things in it that I have actually used. -- John HaslerThis posting is in the public

something is f***ed

1998-10-18 Thread Stephen Crowley
Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no longer login, nor can I su, it just sits there doing nothing. I also cannot telnet to localhost. Someone on irc just upgraded also and got the exact same problem. What is going on!? -- Stephen Crowley Debian GNU/Linux

Re: What Bruce had to say about non-Pixar names. Re: what's after slink

1998-10-18 Thread Jeff Noxon
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:57:50PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote: On Sat, 17 October 1998 11:10:10 -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: john I'd still like to use penguins. Indeed, that was the best proposal yet. Cool, a linux named Opus. Can it get better? Chilly Willy was another famous

Re: something is f***ed

1998-10-18 Thread Stephen Crowley
I found out the problem is in sysklogd, not sure what is going on though. -- Stephen Crowley Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.debian.org -- pgp8zboM3TGbD.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: login time limits in slink???

1998-10-18 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 12:21:06PM -0400, Mitch Blevins wrote: FWIW - I have the same problem. No idled. No logoutd. No lines in /etc/porttime. Still get booted off the console after several hours. Perhaps it's your shell; tcsh has

Re: login time limits in slink???

1998-10-18 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 10:03:30AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: nope. i create all new accounts with bash (*csh sucks). the problem also occurs with ppp logins - in fact, that was how the problem was noticed. perhaps cpu seconds limit enforced by ulimit? See ulimit -a Greetings Bernd --

Re: Uploaded sysklogd 1.3-29 (source i386) to master

1998-10-18 Thread Alex Romosan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) writes: sysklogd (1.3-29) unstable; urgency=low, closes=24893 . * Re-Applied patch provided vom Topi Miettinen with regard to the people from OpenBSD. This provides the additional '-a' argument used for specifying additional UNIX domain

Re: Is rvplayer working for others?

1998-10-18 Thread W. Paul Mills
Works for me. Make sure you have all the libs you need. Output of ldd /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rvplayer/rvplayer /lib/nfslock.so.0 = /lib/nfslock.so.0 (0x4000c000) libXmu.so.6 = /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libXmu.so.6 (0x4000e000) libXt.so.6 = /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libXt.so.6

Re: login time limits in slink???

1998-10-18 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 10:03:30AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: nope. i create all new accounts with bash (*csh sucks). the problem also occurs with ppp logins - in fact, that was how the problem was noticed. perhaps cpu seconds limit enforced

Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-18 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:49:54AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: Quoting Tom Lees ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): While I'm at it, *PLEASE* drop the dependency of lilo on mbr. I don't want a new mbr eg if I want to install LILO to use on a floppy ONLY (I use GRUB on my HD). Change it to Recommends. mbr

Re: login time limits in slink???

1998-10-18 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:30:26AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: nope. the messages printed are specifically mentioning either 1) that the idle timeout has been exceeded, or 2) that the daily time limit has been exceeded. Only on serial lines or on telnet/ssh/console, too? Are u sure there are

Re: login time limits in slink???

1998-10-18 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:30:26AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: nope. the messages printed are specifically mentioning either 1) that the idle timeout has been exceeded, or 2) that the daily time limit has been exceeded. Only on serial lines or

Re: syntax highlighting in gtk

1998-10-18 Thread Ben Gertzfield
Michael == Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Michael I read so much about a patch needed to get syntax Michael highlighting. Do we have that patch in out gtk libs? If Michael no, why not? I'm not sure what you mean by syntax highlighting (isn't that what Emacs does? :) but

Re: More interesting gnome/gtk software

1998-10-18 Thread Ben Gertzfield
Michael == Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Michael I found more than GXedit. There is a nice task timer Michael available named gtimer. I might package that one Michael too. Also there is a GTK mp3 player named replay. It is Michael GPLed but based on amp. I wonder if

Re: Is rvplayer working for others?

1998-10-18 Thread Ben Gertzfield
Rob == Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Rob I've installed the rvplayer package, but even something as Rob simple as Rob rvplayer /usr/doc/rvplayer/examples/welcome.rm Rob doesn't work. The app comes up, and then it just sits there. Rob Does this work for others?

Re: Is rvplayer working for others?

1998-10-18 Thread Brian Almeida
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 07:17:03PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote: rvplayer does not work under Linux 2.1, if that's what you're running. Why not? I noticed today that it wasn't working...are there any fixes? It'll suck when 2.2 comes out and rvplayer don't wrok...

Re: Is rvplayer working for others?

1998-10-18 Thread Rob Browning
W. Paul Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x4018) Ah. You're using the older version, but other than newer versions, I have all the relevant libs. -- Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930

Re: Is rvplayer working for others?

1998-10-18 Thread Rob Browning
Ben Gertzfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: rvplayer does not work under Linux 2.1, if that's what you're running. Thanks. That explains it. Hope it gets fixed soon one way or another... -- Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930

Re: Deleting uncompressed Info/Doc files at upgrades

1998-10-18 Thread Rob Browning
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: M-x toggle-auto-compression M-x auto-compression-mode Just put (auto-compression-mode 1) in your .emacs. -- Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930

Re: Deleting uncompressed Info/Doc files at upgrades

1998-10-18 Thread Rob Browning
Zed Pobre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I don't agree here. Some programs have included example files that are either c files that (unless there's a trick I don't know about) will not compile compressed, or example data files that cannot be read by the program in question compressed. The

Re: Deleting uncompressed Info/Doc files at upgrades

1998-10-18 Thread Rob Browning
Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hmm. We have zless to less gz'd files. Magicfilter will print them, as will a2ps (maybe some others will too, haven't tried it.) Netscape reads them, so does lynx. And of course man and info work with them. zgrep will grep them. vim reads them just

nextish gtk and similar (Was: syntax highlighting in gtk)

1998-10-18 Thread Joseph Carter
Are there any plans to package things like the nextish GTK patches or anything like that? From freshmeat: subject: GTKstep 1.1.2 added by: Ullrich Hafner [EMAIL PROTECTED] time: 15:08 category: Software GTKstep is a patch to improve the boring GTK+ look and feel with a NEXTSTEP(tm) look

Re: nextish gtk and similar (Was: syntax highlighting in gtk)

1998-10-18 Thread Patrick Cole
I have packaged up some gtk 1.0 / gtk 1.1 packages that include the gtkstep patches. I am about to upload these to ftp://fx1.circlefx.com/debian/ in a little while. So anyone feel free to try them out / test them. I have also packaged up cooledit 3.7.4. Regards,

Re: Uploaded sysklogd 1.3-29 (source i386) to master

1998-10-18 Thread Martin Schulze
reopen 24893 thanks Alex Romosan wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) writes: sysklogd (1.3-29) unstable; urgency=low, closes=24893 . * Re-Applied patch provided vom Topi Miettinen with regard to the people from OpenBSD. This provides the additional '-a' argument used

Re: Is rvplayer working for others?

1998-10-18 Thread warp
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 10:30:16PM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote: On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 07:17:03PM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote: rvplayer does not work under Linux 2.1, if that's what you're running. Why not? I noticed today that it wasn't working...are there any fixes? Its a bug in rvplayer,

Re: something is f***ed

1998-10-18 Thread Russell Coker
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Stephen Crowley wrote: Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no longer login, nor can I su, it just sits there doing nothing. I also cannot telnet to localhost. Someone on irc just upgraded also and got the exact same problem. What is going on!?

Re: Uploaded sysklogd 1.3-29 (source i386) to master

1998-10-18 Thread Alex Romosan
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Would you like to test a pre-release of -30? Again, on my server it runs as expected. This release contains a patch against the former version. ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.1_i386.deb i just installed

Re: Uploaded sysklogd 1.3-29 (source i386) to master

1998-10-18 Thread Stephen Crowley
Nope, same problems, cant su, cant telnet in. -- Stephen Crowley Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.debian.org -- pgpD1gxhbyDMg.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: 1FA: problem still in hamm disks

1998-10-18 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Gertzfield) wrote on 16.10.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Brent == Brent Fulgham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Brent I'd like to chime in -- It's a real annoyance that the base Brent disks don't set up lilo to let you boot into multiple Brent operating systems.

Re: what's after slink

1998-10-18 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Tille) wrote on 08.10.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: see at the people near you and look at yourself with the eyes of an Hitchhiker) Can't. (Can you guess that I don't much like the Hitchhiker stuff?) - Another naming scheme without any background would be A, B,

Re: something is f***ed

1998-10-18 Thread Chris Leishman
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote: Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no longer login, nor can I su, it just sits there doing nothing. I also cannot telnet to localhost. Someone on irc just upgraded also and got the exact same

Re: what's after slink

1998-10-18 Thread Ole J. Tetlie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) | | - Another naming scheme without any background would be A, B, C... |There where programming languages doing this for only three |stages to get *very* popular... | | Nope. That wasn't the sequence that led to C. I won't swear to it, but I | seem to

[HELP]: FILESYSTEM ERROR ! :((((((((((((

1998-10-18 Thread Nuno Carvalho
Hi, I'm having serials problems with my linux partition ! :(( It happened when the power was down ! :(( That's what appears: - cut here -- Parallelizing fsck version 1.12 (9-Jul-98) /dev/hda2 contains a file system with errors, check failed /dev/hda2: Unattached inode

Re: something is f***ed

1998-10-18 Thread Remco van de Meent
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Chris Leishman wrote: : On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote: : Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no : longer login, nor can I su, it just sits there doing nothing. I : also cannot telnet to localhost. Someone

Re: [HELP]: FILESYSTEM ERROR ! :(((((((((((( IT'S SOLVED ! :)))

1998-10-18 Thread Nuno Carvalho
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Nuno Carvalho wrote: I'm having serials problems with my linux partition ! :(( It happened when the power was down ! :(( That's what appears: - cut here -- Parallelizing fsck version 1.12 (9-Jul-98) /dev/hda2 contains a file system with errors,

new unstable please

1998-10-18 Thread Thomas Lakofski
Hi, I noticed that with the transition to frozen, as expected, packages too unstable to be in frozen have vanished (on ftp.debian.org, at least). I hope I can expect a new unstable to appear within a few days, if only to drop those packages which were removed from frozen into it. I guess a name

Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?

1998-10-18 Thread Gregory S. Stark
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You'll also find the new version which has the offending code removed: ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-28_i386.deb Does -29 have it reinserted? I'm seeing the same problem. greg

Netscape packages and lesstif

1998-10-18 Thread Gregory S. Stark
The dmotif netscape packages seem to depend on lesstif, does this mean you can run them with just lesstif? Or is that in addition to requiring real Motif libraries? I'm surprised (but happily so) since i thought lesstif aimed only at source-level compatibility not binary level. greg

Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?

1998-10-18 Thread Martin Schulze
Gregory S. Stark wrote: You'll also find the new version which has the offending code removed: ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-28_i386.deb Does -29 have it reinserted? I'm seeing the same problem. Yes. That was the intention - which failed again. *sigh*

Re: Uploaded sysklogd 1.3-29 (source i386) to master

1998-10-18 Thread Martin Schulze
Alex Romosan wrote: Alex Romosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: i just installed sysklogd 1.3-29.1 on one of my systems. i'll let you know if i have any problems with it or not. thanks. well, i can't send any mail out, and there is nothing logged to syslog. i can't su either. looks like

Re: new unstable please

1998-10-18 Thread M.C. Vernon
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Thomas Lakofski wrote: Hi, I noticed that with the transition to frozen, as expected, packages too unstable to be in frozen have vanished (on ftp.debian.org, at least). I hope I can expect a new unstable to appear within a few days, if only to drop those packages

Re: login time limits in slink???

1998-10-18 Thread Bart Warmerdam
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:30:26AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: [snip] nope. the messages printed are specifically mentioning either 1) that the idle timeout has been exceeded, or 2) that the daily time limit has been exceeded. Do you have PAM installed. I vaguely remember you can

Re: new unstable please

1998-10-18 Thread warp
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:54:28AM +0100, M.C. Vernon wrote: On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Thomas Lakofski wrote: Hi, I noticed that with the transition to frozen, as expected, packages too unstable to be in frozen have vanished (on ftp.debian.org, at least). I hope I can expect a new

Re: KDE gone, Linux next ? [binary only support != good support]

1998-10-18 Thread Georg Bauer
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Ristuccia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, this new security fix breaks the binary-only gigabit ethernet driver. That's what stable kernel interfaces are for. Actually I don't recall _any_ change in a stable kernel that broke any kernel-interface. Ok,

Re: something is f***ed

1998-10-18 Thread Steve Lamb
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998 11:20:28 +0200 (CEST), Remco van de Meent wrote: On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Chris Leishman wrote: : On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote: : Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no : longer login, nor can I su, it just

Re: What Bruce had to say about non-Pixar names. Re: what's after slink

1998-10-18 Thread servis
*- Jeff Noxon wrote about Re: What Bruce had to say about non-Pixar names. Re: what's after slink | On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:57:50PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote: | On Sat, 17 October 1998 11:10:10 -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | john I'd still like to use penguins. |Indeed, that was

Re: What Bruce had to say about non-Pixar names. Re: what's after slink

1998-10-18 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 09:26:10AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *- Jeff Noxon wrote about Re: What Bruce had to say about non-Pixar names. Re: what's after slink | On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:57:50PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote: | On Sat, 17 October 1998 11:10:10 -0400, Dirk Eddelbuettel

Emacs addon packages--compile upon install?

1998-10-18 Thread Ben Pfaff
This morning I uploaded a version of w3-el that doesn't compile upon installation--instead, there are separate precompiled packages for Emacs 19 and Emacs 20, plus a shared documentation package. I see this as a better way to go than forcing the end-user to have to sit through a long compile (it

Re: [owner@bugs.debian.org: Debian bugs information: logs for bug#26827]

1998-10-18 Thread warp
On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 09:29:28AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: snip It IS implied that its FULLY gnu-su compatible, if it is not then it Where did you find that? I never read it. See control file, under provides. should not provide su, very very simple.. But then gnu-su is not your

Re: Removing Gnome [was: Removing Packages in Slink for Debian 2.1]

1998-10-18 Thread Jim Pick
Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Craig Sanders wrote: maybe a compromise would be to leave the packages in slink, make sure the Description: field highlights their alpha status, and automatically close all non-packaging bugs (and forward them upstream if

Re: PROPOSAL: one debian list for all porting efforts

1998-10-18 Thread John Goerzen
Martin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: around compiling all the i386 stuff for the other archs. But nobody goes around compiling the stuff from the other archs for i386! So if I suddenly do all my package development on Alpha, the Alpha will

Re: Emacs addon packages--compile upon install?

1998-10-18 Thread Jim Pick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Pfaff) writes: This morning I uploaded a version of w3-el that doesn't compile upon installation--instead, there are separate precompiled packages for Emacs 19 and Emacs 20, plus a shared documentation package. I see this as a better way to go than forcing the

Re: something is f***ed

1998-10-18 Thread Stephen Crowley
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:20:28AM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote: On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Chris Leishman wrote: : On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote: : Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no : longer login, nor can I su, it just

Re: Emacs addon packages--compile upon install?

1998-10-18 Thread Ben Pfaff
Jim Pick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree that waiting for the large add-on packages to compile during installation is very aggravating. At the same time, it puts a lot of load on the maintainers to build so many byte-compiled versions. I'm not sure what you mean by this. With w3-el,

Re: Possible serious problem with the newest sysklogd?

1998-10-18 Thread Stephen Crowley
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 12:36:37PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: Could you try the next prelimnary version? ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.2_i386.deb Great! This seems to fix it, no problems here. -- Stephen Crowley Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Re: Emacs addon packages--compile upon install?

1998-10-18 Thread Rob Browning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Pfaff) writes: I am trying to remember the rationale we had for making Emacs' addon packages compile when they install themselves, and I can't remember it. Perhaps you can remind me. The main reasons I recall were that we didn't want to have 4 (or more later) different

Re: something is f***ed

1998-10-18 Thread Martin Schulze
Stephen Crowley wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 11:20:28AM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote: On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Chris Leishman wrote: : On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote: : Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no : longer

Re: graphical workspace viewer

1998-10-18 Thread Rob Browning
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there something like a graphical workspace viewer for Gnome? Do you mean a file browser, or a pager? If the former, then there's gmc. -- Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930

Re: Uploaded sysklogd 1.3-29 (source i386) to master

1998-10-18 Thread Adam P. Harris
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I introduced a severe bug. Could you try the next prelimnary version and tell me if it works for you? ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.2_i386.deb Works for me. I was getting hangs

libgimp/glib/gtk weirdness...

1998-10-18 Thread Jules Bean
When trying to build my rather overdue debian package (libgimp-perl), I get this at the configure stage: configure:815: cc -o conftest -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include co nftest.c -L/usr/lib -lgimpui -lgimp -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lgtk -lgdk -lglib -lXi -l Xext -lX11 -lm 15

Re: PROPOSAL: one debian list for all porting efforts

1998-10-18 Thread Adam P. Harris
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: around compiling all the i386 stuff for the other archs. But nobody goes around compiling the stuff from the other archs for i386! So if I

Re: Emacs addon packages--compile upon install?

1998-10-18 Thread Michael Stone
Quoting Ben Pfaff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I'm not sure what you mean by this. With w3-el, I just set it up to build each flavor in a separate subdirectory; i.e., mkdir e19; cd e19; ../configure --with-emacs=emacs19; make mkdir e20; cd e20; ../configure --with-emacs=emacs20; make

Re: libgimp/glib/gtk weirdness...

1998-10-18 Thread Stephen Crowley
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 07:54:35PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: When trying to build my rather overdue debian package (libgimp-perl), I get this at the configure stage: [stuff deleted] Is this a bug? If so, in which package? I've copied Che into this email anyway, since he seems to be

Re: Uploaded sysklogd 1.3-29 (source i386) to master

1998-10-18 Thread Alex Romosan
Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I introduced a severe bug. Could you try the next prelimnary version and tell me if it works for you? ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.2_i386.deb well, i just tried 1.3-30 and it seems to work so far. --alex-- --

Re: (WARNING) xfree86 3.3.2.3a-2 (source all i386) uploaded to master

1998-10-18 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 06:02:15AM -0400, Gregory S. Stark wrote: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Oct 16, 1998 at 10:25:57AM -0700, Ben Gertzfield wrote: Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: W: xext: shlib-without-dependency-information

Re: Which PGP?

1998-10-18 Thread David Frey
On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:23:38PM +0100, James Troup wrote: Dave Swegen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de facto standard. I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a number of people use 2.6... 2.x; we don't accept later stuff. Really? I recently

Re: Emacs addon packages--compile upon install?

1998-10-18 Thread Richard Braakman
Michael Stone wrote: Simple because you didn't have to worry about xemacs. For other maintainers, they'd need e19, e20, xe19, and xe20. That would take what, about 100M? Not so elegant. *shrug* The lesstif maintainer needs more than that just to compile his package :-) Supporting only a

Re: Which PGP?

1998-10-18 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, David Frey wrote: On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:23:38PM +0100, James Troup wrote: Dave Swegen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de facto standard. I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a number of people use 2.6... 2.x; we

Re: libgimp/glib/gtk weirdness...

1998-10-18 Thread Jules Bean
--On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 1:57 pm -0500 Stephen Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 1998 at 07:54:35PM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: When trying to build my rather overdue debian package (libgimp-perl), I get this at the configure stage: [stuff deleted] Is this a bug? If so, in

Re: Which PGP?

1998-10-18 Thread James Troup
David Frey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Oct 15, 1998 at 08:23:38PM +0100, James Troup wrote: Dave Swegen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Out of curiosity, which version of PGP is the debian de facto standard. I'm currently using v5, but I've seen a number of people use 2.6... 2.x; we don't

Re: Which PGP?

1998-10-18 Thread James Troup
Bob Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What is the status of gnupg? Not yet used in Debian. Is there a Debian package available? Yes, on non-US. -- James

Re: PROPOSAL: one debian list for all porting efforts

1998-10-18 Thread James Troup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam P. Harris) writes: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Martin Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: around compiling all the i386 stuff for the other archs. But nobody goes around compiling