-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:43:37 -0800
Source: xdaliclock
Binary: xdaliclock
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.18-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 11:41:55 +0100
Source: base-files
Binary: base-files
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.2.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Santiago Vila [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 18:04:39 -0800
Source: debconf
Binary: debconf-utils debconf debconf-doc
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.5.39
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 15:03:20 +1000
Source: iputils
Binary: iputils-tracepath iputils-ping
Architecture: m68k
Version: 20001110-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 15:22:56 +0200
Source: irssi-text
Binary: irssi-text
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.7.97.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Pekka Aleksi Knuutila
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 16:20:47 +0900
Source: ruby
Binary: libreadline-ruby libtk-ruby libnkf-ruby libpty-ruby libsdbm-ruby
ruby-dev ruby libgdbm-ruby libcurses-ruby irb ruby-examples libruby libdbm-ruby
libtcltk-ruby ruby-elisp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 14:29:32 +1100
Source: bonnie++
Binary: bonnie++
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.00g
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 19:39:38 +
Source: dante
Binary: libsocksd dante-client dante-server libsocksd-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 18:10:18 +0100
Source: epos
Binary: epos
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1:2.4.43a-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Milan Zamazal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 19:11:56 -0800
Source: sirc
Binary: sirc
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.211-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Gertzfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:23:55 -0500
Source: rrdtool
Binary: librrdp-perl librrd0-dev librrds-perl rrdtool rrdtool-tcl librrd0
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.0.27-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 12:48:30 +0100
Source: libmcal
Binary: libmcal0-dev libmcal libmcal0
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.6-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ola
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 14:33:47 -0500
Source: shadow
Binary: passwd login
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2902-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Collins [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:45:47 +0100
Source: ezbounce
Binary: ezbounce
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.99.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Karl Soderstrom [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 22:51:16 +0100
Source: bplay
Binary: bplay
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.991-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter Makholm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 21:43:55 -0800
Source: gdm
Binary: gdm
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.0-0.beta4.15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ryan Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 17:07:40 +
Source: gtkfontsel
Binary: gtkfontsel
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dima Barsky [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 16:32:34 -0800
Source: gtk+
Binary: libgtk-doc libgtk-dbg libgtk1 libgtk-dev
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1:1.0.6-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 19:32:23 +0100
Source: snort
Binary: snort
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.6.3a-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Hammers [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:04:44 -0400
Source: gtypist
Binary: gtypist
Architecture: m68k
Version: 2.3.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ben Armstrong [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 16:07:19 +0100
Source: lxr
Binary: lxr
Architecture: m68k
Version: 0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Giacomo Catenazzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 14:58:05 -0500
Source: ircii-pana
Binary: bitchx bitchx-gtk
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1:1.0-0c17-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 20:51:34 -0800
Source: groff
Binary: groff
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.16-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Woodcock [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 22:46:27 -0500
Source: fileutils
Binary: fileutils
Architecture: sparc
Version: 4.0.35-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Stone [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 12:52:04 +0100
Source: less
Binary: less
Architecture: sparc
Version: 358-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Thomas Schoepf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 16:36:26 +1100
Source: perl-5.6
Binary: perl-5.6-doc perl-5.6-suid perl-5.6-debug perl-5.6 libperl5.6
perl-5.6-thread perl-5.6-base
Architecture: sparc all
Version: 5.6.0-6.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 01:07:10 +
Source: gdbm
Binary: libgdbmg1-dev libgdbmg1
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.7.3-27
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: James Troup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 13:47:13 +1000
Source: netkit-base
Binary: netkit-ping netkit-rpc netkit-inetd
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.10-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 17:20:47 +0100
Source: procmail
Binary: procmail
Architecture: sparc
Version: 3.15-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Santiago Vila [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 07:12:36 -0500
Source: libpam-opie
Binary: libpam-opie
Architecture: sparc
Version: 0.21-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Michael Stone [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 03:30:00 -0700
Source: kdelibs
Binary: libarts-dev kdelibs3 kdelibs3-dev kdelibs3-doc libarts
Architecture: all sparc
Version: 4:2.1-20010101-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 05:52:49 -0400
Source: libmime-base64-perl
Binary: libmime-base64-perl
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.11-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 10:46:27 +0900
Source: hanterm
Binary: hanterm
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1:3.3.1p18-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Chu-yeon Park [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 18:09:38 +0100
Source: zip
Binary: zip
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.30-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 18:23:55 +
Source: unison
Binary: unison
Architecture: sparc
Version: 2.6.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert McQueen [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 17:11:00 -0700
Source: kdeutils
Binary: kab karm klpq kdepasswd klaptopdaemon kedit khexedit kfloppy kcalc kpm
knotes ark kjots kfind kljettool kcharselect ktimemon
Architecture: sparc
Version: 4:2.1-20010101-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 17:07:40 +
Source: gtkfontsel
Binary: gtkfontsel
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Dima Barsky [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 10:46:02 -0800
Source: queue
Binary: queue
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.30.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 00:20:37 +0100
Source: libghttp
Binary: libghttp1 libghttp-dev
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.0.8-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 17:27:30 +1100
Source: psmisc
Binary: psmisc
Architecture: sparc
Version: 19-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/SPARC Build Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Craig Small [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:41:24AM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
as for including other's in the Mail-Followup-To mutt only does this
if those users had used `lists' instead of `subscribe' indicating they
WANT to be CCed.
There must be a bug in it somewhere, then, because I often see
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:53:04PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
In fact, the only thing the RFC says to do is to honor Reply-To:
headers,
which I might note you didn't include in your message.
Why should I, when it would be no different
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:07:27PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
have been added to Mail-Followup-To by other Mutt users, and I don't use
the
lists command at all.
in that case there would be something funny going on, here is my
theory:
you post to list, you M-F-To: is set to only the
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:18:40AM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
if this is the case the solution is fixing broken mailers, many of
them are Free software so why have patches to support M-F-To not been
made?
I'd like to see someone convince that M-F-To fix Pine. But I doubt you'll
have an
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:23:23PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:18:40AM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
if this is the case the solution is fixing broken mailers, many of
them are Free software so why have patches to support M-F-To not been
made?
I'd like to see
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Description:http://aterm.sourceforge.net
aterm is based upon rxvt v.2.4.8 with add ons of
Alfredo Kojima's NeXT-ish scrollbars. Fast transparency
functionality, background lightening/darkening or/and
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ethan pine is a lost cause anyway. i was thinking of GNUs which
Ethan seems to be the other big offender of ignorage of M-F-To.
Ethan (i am not sure if it respects Mail-Copies-To: never i just
Ethan started adding that.)
Gnus
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:27:13AM -0500, Chris Gray wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Description:http://aterm.sourceforge.net
Someone please close this bug once it gets a number from the BTS.
Package: aterm
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 308
Maintainer: Jordi
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 03:23:03PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
I'm concerned with some breakage in the man program. Here is an example:
[snip examples]
This is because man runs via a wrapper that makes it run as user man
(and makes root's pager run as user man too for some reason).
Related
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:07:27PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
in that case there would be something funny going on, here is my
theory:
you post to list, you M-F-To: is set to only the list
someone (Mr-Broken) with broken mailer uses reply-to-all which CCs you
anyway ignoring M-F-To.
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 11:11:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not look at this from a different perspective? I don't know if it may be
useful or not for upgrading machines, but the multicast server would be a
very nice thing for mass installations.
I still disagree. Multicast is the
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 11:24:26PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
I try to build a crosscompiler i386-arm (but also other archs). At one
point headerfiles for the target architecture are needed. Where could I find
headerfiles for other archs? Are there development packages for this purpose?
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 12:39:58PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
* Andreas Schuldei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [001229 23:24]:
I try to build a crosscompiler i386-arm (but also other archs). At one
point headerfiles for the target architecture are needed. Where could I find
headerfiles for
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:11:50PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
Mail-Followup-To is the correct header to use.
Mail-Followup-To isn't even a registered header! The closest thing to a
registry that RFC822 implies is in the hands of SRI International is
Ethan Benson wrote:
the problem with this is you end up with the catman files owned by
whatever user reads whatever man page. personally as a sysadmin i
don't want users gaining write permission to files in any more places
under /var then there already is (ahem texmf). i am not certain if
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:15:23PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:23:55PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
the new 'testing' distribution (sid) should be even better - nearly
all the benefits of 'unstable' but tested to at least install properly
without error.
Wrong:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:23:23PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
btw is it Mail-Copies-To: never or Mail-Copies-To: nobody ? i have
seen both which is correct? (assuming any MUA actually pays any
attention to this header anyway)
'nobody' is correct.
'never' is deprecated but still observed by
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:53:37PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
Ethan Benson wrote:
the problem with this is you end up with the catman files owned by
whatever user reads whatever man page. personally as a sysadmin i
don't want users gaining write permission to files in any more places
under
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:09:07PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
Peter Palfrader wrote:
There is a further weird package disappearance in unstable: all mgetty
packages (execept mgetty-doc) are gone!
[...]
Hey, these are important packages.
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ethan pine is a lost cause anyway. i was thinking of GNUs which
Ethan seems to be the other big offender of ignorage of M-F-To. (i
Ethan am not sure if it respects Mail-Copies-To: never i just
Ethan started adding that.)
That just
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:11:50PM -0700, John Galt wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Craig Sanders wrote:
Mail-Followup-To is the correct header to use.
Mail-Followup-To isn't even a registered header! The closest thing to a
registry that RFC822
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:48:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
That just demonstrates you have no idea what you are talking about.
oh please. someone already pointed out to me that older versions of
Gnus ignored M-F-To but the current one does not.
go fuck off.
--
Ethan Benson
John Galt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PLEASE DON'T CC ME. I'M ON THE LIST
FYI 28 (aka RFC 1855) is the standard.
Strictly speaking it's is only a standard if it is on the Standard
Track and RFC1855 isn't. It is only an informational RFC.
PLEASE DON'T CC ME. I'M ON THE LIST
On 01-01-04 Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
Does anyone know where Loic has been lately (i.e., for the past two years
or so)? AFAIK his last package upload was in November 1998, and the mail
I sent him about whether he needs help with mailx has generated no reply.
Since mailx is important, if the
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 02:10:19AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
touch /var/run/debian-mirror.pid
chown mirror.nogroup /var/run/debian-mirror.pid
touch /var/log/debian-mirror.log
chown mirror.nogroup /var/log/debian-mirror.log
Please don't do this. nogroup should not be the group of any
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:06:18PM -0800, Erik Hollensbe wrote:
apt-get and it's kin need more simple getopt-style flags that allow
overriding of certain things, mainly conflicts. Also, an option to
actually view what's being upgraded before you download 250 packages that
are only going to
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ethan On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:48:46AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
That just demonstrates you have no idea what you are talking about.
Ethan oh please. someone already pointed out to me that older
Ethan versions of Gnus ignored M-F-To
Hello
One of the programs I'd like to package has somewhat unclean licence.
The readme file says only:
COPYRIGHT: This program is FREEWARE!
which I don't suppose is enough for us.
The webpage is a bit more descriptive and says:
These programs are freeware, which means that they may be
Russell Coker wrote:
I'm sure that Ben will welcome your contributions towards maintaining the
libc6 package. All you have to do is read the list of bugs, solve some, and
send in patches.
I'm not trying to bash Ben. He did a wonderful work in resolving many
bugs and generally keeping
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:34:26AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
You prove my point. Resorting to invective is the last refuge
of the incompetent. This is your second demonstration of incompetence
in a public forum in 24 hours; and I suspect your drop in the
estimation of the
Hello.
I'd like to package CRACK, the well know password security checker.
It has a nice licence, derived from Artistic and is no doubt a useful tool
for an administrator.
Pawel
--
(___) | Pawel Wiecek +48603240006 http://www.coven.vmh.net/ |
o o | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the other hand, we might want to copy the OpenBSD version instead
of maintaining our own man. But I leave that to whoever maintains the
packages.
We have alternatives on almost everything but dpkg and man. If someone
thinks it's worth the effort to
Is there any apt-able server out there that is accessible with a better
bandwidth than ftp.debian.org (currently 468 bytes/sec) but still is
up-to-date?
ftp.debian.org has been very flaky for me for weeks. And neither
ftp.de.debian.org nor source.rfc822.org are up-to-date. I guess they have
the
Pawel Wiecek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These programs are freeware, which means that they may be distributed
freely.
Nope, we should explicitly have the rights to distribute and modify
the program.
I have a commercial binary that needs this library. Yes, I can find it in
potato, but not in unstable. Is there a new package providing
libnss1-compat?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael@Fam-Meskes.De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:20:11AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
I've just reported what I had thought, some many many months ago,
to be a problem. Of course, the maintainer has not done anything
about this report for 7 months, and then he closes it like that.
Not good.
Oh, and just to
Hello
I'd like to package lovecalc (http://www.lovecalculator.com/).
Because of kinda unclean licence I'm not quite sure if it'll go into main or
non-free (this depends on whether I convince the author to write a more
precise one, I guess).
Pawel
--
(___) | Pawel Wiecek
On Thursday 04 January 2001 20:50, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
Russell Coker wrote:
I'm sure that Ben will welcome your contributions towards maintaining the
libc6 package. All you have to do is read the list of bugs, solve some,
and send in patches.
I'm not trying to bash Ben. He did a
Chris Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Description:http://aterm.sourceforge.net
[4 ysabell:~] grep-available -s Package,Maintainer -P aterm
Package: aterm-ml
Maintainer: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: aterm
Maintainer: Jordi Mallach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please close bug#81180
I gonna package yardradius, see http://yardradius.sourceforge.net.
I'm the upstream author.
$Id: README,v 1.4 2001/01/02 09:41:19 kiavik Exp $
Yet Another Radius Daemon (YARD RADIUS) README File
This program is a RADIUS RFC compliant daemon which is
On 22 Dec 2000, Stephen Zander wrote:
Piotr ITO: libapache-asp-perl
Piotr ITO: libapache-filter-perl
Piotr ITO: libapache-ssi-perl
Piotr ITO: libcgi-pm-perl
Piotr ITO: libdbd-csv-perl
Piotr ITO: libhtml-clean-perl
Piotr ITO: libhtml-simpleparse-perl
Piotr
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Oh, and just to chime in on this little bit, I did not start maintaining
glibc until Aug 31, 2000 (my first changelog entry). So no, I have not
been sitting on this for 7 months. Get your facts straight.
And just to chime in, I appreciate the huge effort and many
Russell Coker wrote:
This is already being done for some packages. Check the maintainer address
on the gcc package for an example.
The thing that determines this is whether there are multiple people who are
skillful and willing to work.
If you want to be the second developer for libc6
How long does it take usually for a (GPG) key sent to keyring.debian.org
to show up in official keyring (and maintainers database)?
I'm waiting for my new GPG key to show up for quite a few weeks and it seems a
bit excessive to me :^)
BTW -- our web interface to developers database
Yes, I've been in a packaging mood lately :)
I'd like to have Tk707 packaged. Tk707 is a software clone of the
Roland TR-707 rhythm composer, a drum machine.
It is written in C and Tk and it uses the alsa sequencer. I am using
it together with the latest alsa modules and lib (compiled from
Previously Joey Hess wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
This still leaves us with two problems:
1. there is no 100% correct way to decide if something is an override
or not
They're flagged local or so arn't they?
Either `local' or 'user' in my suid.conf, but it could be anything
except
Hi Pawel!
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001, Pawel Wiecek wrote:
How long does it take usually for a (GPG) key sent to keyring.debian.org
to show up in official keyring (and maintainers database)?
I'm waiting for my new GPG key to show up for quite a few weeks and it seems a
bit excessive to me :^)
New
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:01:43AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
Is there any apt-able server out there that is accessible with a better
bandwidth than ftp.debian.org (currently 468 bytes/sec) but still is
up-to-date?
There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:44:49PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 08:41:06PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
If I'm already replying to a list, I'm not going to waste bandwidth by
mailing you personally as well.
So what you're saying is that you're purposely ignoring
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 06:14:05PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 11:57:07PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Please don't encourage private mirrors!
Debian itself encourages private mirrors. Personally, I'd rather just
download a new ISO every 3 months or so as new versions
THANK YOU. Finally, an answer that I can use.
I will look into contributing towards this package.
--
Erik Hollensbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmer, Powells Internet Division
I respect a man who lets me know where he stands, even if he is wrong.
- Malcolm X
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Matt Zimmerman
The severity of bug #67556 (package quota) should be changed from wishlist to
important since it fixes a problem which makes the package unusable on big
endian architectures (getopt() returns int(-1) and not char(-1)). Or at least
it should be advisable to separate the getopt() bug from the rest
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:03:15AM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
I have a commercial binary that needs this library. Yes, I can find it in
potato, but not in unstable. Is there a new package providing
libnss1-compat?
libnss1-compat would not compile cleanly with the latest glibc. So if
you need
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:48:34PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
Sure. But I was hoping someone would know a machine that a) is up-to-date
(the three machines outside the US I tried so far are not) and b) is
accessible pretty well (which
Pawel Wiecek writes:
I'd like to package CRACK, the well know password security checker.
It has a nice licence, derived from Artistic and is no doubt a
useful tool for an administrator.
Have you looked at the package john? AFAIK john can do anything crack
can do.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 02:56:41PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:48:34PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
There are almost two hundred public Debian mirrors, use them.
Sure. But I was hoping someone would know a machine that a) is up-to-date
(the three machines outside
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:04:07PM +0100, Andreas Voegele wrote:
Pawel Wiecek writes:
I'd like to package CRACK, the well know password security checker.
It has a nice licence, derived from Artistic and is no doubt a
useful tool for an administrator.
Have you looked at the package john?
On Jan 4, 1:11pm, Peter Palfrader wrote:
New keys sent to keyring.debian.org via gpg --send will take approximatly
Gosh...
forever. New keys have to be added my hand by the keyring maintainer and
Emailed him as well...
this might long (up 2 12 months?) (see a thread here on -devel perhaps
With the raging flame war going on about MUAs, I'm embarassed to mail this
with lotus notes, but, hey, its all I have at work.
Back on topic, I would have thought that package distribution was a one
time shot. Caches are for people who would otherwise download the
slashdot.org header graphic
Date:Thu, 04 Jan 2001 11:06:43 +1100
To: Jim Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Erik Hollensbe [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)
On Wed, Jan
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
