Quoting Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Par contre je me permets d'émettre des doutes quant à l'utilisation de
/usr/bin/www-browser. Si c'est un navigateur texte, vu que tu ne
requiers pas de terminal, ça ne marchera pas. Utiliser x-www-browser
serait peut-être plus approprié, mais
Quoting Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Et tu n'es pas le seul. C'est pour cela qu'on a inventé invoke-rc.d,
cf sa page de manuel.
Si je la comprends bien, invoke-rc.d regarde dans quel runlevel on
est et n'exécute l'action start que si le lancement du processus est
prévu dans ce runlevel
Quoting Martin Quinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello,
J'ai fini par craquer entre deux seances de recheche bibliographique comme
je les aime, j'ai fait un ptit mail sur devel pour demander pourquoi on
pourrait pas avoir les cles des non DD sur les serveurs debian.
Et je me sens un peu tout
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:28:58AM +0200, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Bonjour,
Je viens de recevoir :
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 21 07:52:15 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Received: (qmail 6583 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2003 22:53:02 -
Received: from
Quoting Eric Heintzmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Soyons precis :
command=/bin/sh -c \/usr/bin/www-browser http://localhost:2317\;
Ce qui est précisément ce que j'ai fait et :
Argument invalide : « /usr/bin/www-browser http://localhost:2317 »
Irritant, non ?
Le Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:36:23AM +0200, Sven Luther écrivait:
C'est quoi ? Je ne fais des upload que pour i386.
Un upload d'une compilation pour hppa (il n'y a pas de sources
mentionnées dans l'upload).
C'est un autobuilder qui cause ? C'est étrange puisque le paquet a été
recompilé pour
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:41:38PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Philipp Kern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 15:33, Christian Perrier wrote:
{snip}
At least I'm not added as looking for keysigning.
If that helps.
I guess somebody listed from Haut Rhin would be
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Eric Heintzmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Soyons precis :
command=/bin/sh -c \/usr/bin/www-browser http://localhost:2317\;
Ce qui est précisément ce que j'ai fait et :
Argument invalide : « /usr/bin/www-browser http://localhost:2317 »
Irritant, non ?
Quoting Christian Surchi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
From Netcraft newsletter and web site:
Debian Linux distribution 10 years old today
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/08/16/debian_linux_distribution_10_years_old_today.html
I'm not so sure about the value of their Debian geographical
Christian Perrier dijo [Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:36:02PM +0200]:
Wow.According to this chart, about a third of hosts running Debian
are in France.. :-)
For sure, several major web hosting and Internet Access Providers run
Debian hosts for their key servers herebut I think this graph
Who is interested in stack protection?
I think it would be good to have some experiments of stack protected packages
for Debian. Probably the best way to do this would be to start with
ssh-stack and sysklogd-stack being uploaded to experimental. I don't have
time to do this, but I would like
Hello,
Thank you for contacting Simplicity Pattern Co.
This Auto-Reply message is being sent to you as a convenience to let you
know that we have received your email message. We will attempt to reply to
your email as quickly as possible.
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT WARNING: We DO NOT send out any
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Since the source goes into Debian main, keeping the sources
together means that we are distributing non-free material in Debian
main, which not only violates the social contract, it may well be
illegal (or have people who distribute
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:29:52PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
But the point is that without the key, anyone can forge mails which seem to
come from me, and thus abuse the trust my work gained me in the mind of some
DDs.
I see this point as necessary even if not sufficient.
Ok, a valid key
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:34:12PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 15:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:44:22PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
The negative effect for the users is that you can't upgrade python
while wxgtk-python is installed so
Your mail to 'Consume-thenet' with the subject
Re: Your application
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
Your mail to 'Consume-thenet' with the subject
Re: That movie
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of
Dear debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
JARING E-Mail Virus Scanner has detected virus(es) in your e-mail attachment(s)
Original Date: Aug 21 12:57:10
Original Sender: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Original To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original Subject: Undeliverable: ALERT: You may have sent a Virus
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:57:06PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Who is interested in stack protection?
I think it would be good to have some experiments of stack protected packages
for Debian. Probably the best way to do this would be to start with
ssh-stack and sysklogd-stack being
Scott James Remnant:
If you read the script,
I did, but I couldn't figure out what was the input.
The only MD5 sums that GNU have provided are for 2.4, 2.4.1 and 2.4.2
Right. I sent them an update mail earlier this week, but I guess they're
quite busy at the moment...
--
\\//
Peter -
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:18:24AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, cobaco wrote:
I'd agree if there had been a rewrite of kdelibs or something, but
kde 3.1 - 3.2 is evolutionary without big changes to what was
already there.
It
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 14:56, Brian May wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:57:06PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Who is interested in stack protection?
I think it would be good to have some experiments of stack protected
packages for Debian. Probably the best way to do this would be to start
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 19:00:54 -0600, Jamin W Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 14:46, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On 20 Aug 2003 10:51:54 -0400, Adam C Powell IV said:
Greetings, Installing a new kernel package can be a bit of a
pain, especially for newbies, what with
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 23:40:18 -0400 (EDT), Jaldhar H Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Since the source goes into Debian main, keeping the sources
together means that we are distributing non-free material in Debian
main, which not only violates the
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello,
The package barrendero is a candidate for removal from testing. It has
I had a quick look at the BTS and it seems that the two RC bugs may be
easily fixed (one is a missing Build-Depends on debhelper, the other
an error in debian/rules for
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:16:05 +0200, Josef Spillner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the KDE release plan might be delayed (as well...)
The sarge release plan _will_ be delayed.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber |
, , (8652) 995
850/1/2/3/4
Martin Quinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Of course, I could (and have) uploaded my key on public servers, meaning
that other Debian member could check than a given mail with my address
desserve the trust they habitually give me. But those guys would have to
configure their email
Your mail to 'suse-s390-announce' with the subject
Re: Approved
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:56:31AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:16:05 +0200, Josef Spillner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the KDE release plan might be delayed (as well...)
The sarge release plan _will_ be delayed.
Quite confident, are we?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Russell Coker wrote:
Who is interested in stack protection?
I think it would be good to have some experiments of stack protected packages
for Debian.
Also is there any interest in uploading a kernel-image package with the grsec
PaX support built in?
grsec is IMHO a
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:04:40AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
Ok. Lets leave aside for a moment the .debs which would go into contrib
or non-free so would have to be built seperately. What happens if
webmin-squid has an RC bug? As Goswin said, all the webmin-* packages
will be held back
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:20:42PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
As for the problem with the source file containing non-free code,
if you have prestine source code, this is something that
really needs to get fixed upstream :-(, eg. split into two
files.
Looking at the other messages in the
Quoting Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No he wouldn't. FDL is about free documentation. :-)
Except it isn't :-)
According to you :-)
According to debian-legal consensus.
Is
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:39, Xavier Roche wrote:
Major issues for a ro-/ are maybe:
- using devfs for /dev (kernel 2.4 and package devfsd installed)
Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to start
depending on it.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, RADIANT\RII, StellaHsieh()/
Subject of the message: Re: That movie
No action was taken on the attachment.
Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons:
Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)
Recipient of the attachment: SEXCHANGE, First Storage Group\Mailbox Store
(SEXCHANGE), mailbackup/
Subject of the message: Re: That movie
No action was taken on the attachment.
Attachment document_9446.pif was Logged Only for the following reasons:
Scan Engine Failure (0x80004005)
Hi Steve,
thanks for the work. A couple of questions for clarity's sake (as
sysadmin, not packager)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:37:59PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
- Per-package /etc/pam.d/ configuration files should not include
explicit 'password' blocks. Instead, services should use
At Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:17:27 +1000,
Anthony Towns wrote:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:49:33AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:49:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Also make sure to include some leg room if you depend on
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The only problem with that is the current failure to comply to policy,
i.e. build from source
Jrme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Peter S Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jrme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No he wouldn't. FDL is about free documentation. :-)
Except it isn't :-)
According to you :-)
According to
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 15:02, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Adam C Powell IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings,
Installing a new kernel package can be a bit of a pain, especially for
newbies, what with hand-editing
Quoting Martin Quinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Of course, the signature is not sufficient to get the needed trust. But I'm
coordinator of the french translation team since a few years, so my skills
should be trustable, I guess.
But the point is that without the key, anyone can forge mails
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
But descriptions can be deceiving. Does anyone use this package who
could comment on its reliability? Does the lack of other bugs indicate
that the software is mature and stable, or unused?
I am trying barrendero but don't trust it enough yet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 16:06, David Smith wrote:
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Content-Type: text/html;
[ dsmith_sig1.GIF]
people here tend to regard stuff like your mail as spam already ...
Uli
-BEGIN PGP
This is an automated response to your e-mail.
Your e-mail has been received
by the McCall Pattern Company:
Butterick,
McCall's and Vogue Patterns.
E-mail is answered in the order it
Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Quinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Of course, I could (and have) uploaded my key on public servers, meaning
that other Debian member could check than a given mail with my address
desserve the trust they habitually give me. But those
Russell Coker wrote:
It sounds like we need a propolice enabled GCC.
I have talked to Matthias Klose, one of the GCC maintainers, about this.
He included the patch so he could built ProPolice-enables packages of
gcc and g++ but he's currently too busy with other things. He might
accept a patch
Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Why not? Just block binary uploads completely, and let everything get
built by the buildds. I certainly plan to do that with my own uploads.
(I've already set up my own buildds).
I'd go one step farther
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:22:38 +1000, Anthony Towns
aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:56:31AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:16:05 +0200, Josef Spillner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the KDE release plan might be delayed (as well...)
The sarge release plan
Xavier Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Russell Coker wrote:
Major issues for a ro-/ are maybe:
- using devfs for /dev (kernel 2.4 and package devfsd installed)
Alternatively you can copy /dev to a ramdisk.
And please don't use devfsd. That somewhat cancles out half of the
Quoting Jamin W. Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This has been covered to death already. There are a sufficient number
of respondents that see it as non-free. The RM's recent post indicates
that possibly the FSF has even come around to the idea that their
license is less than Free. Can we
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:37:10PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:34:12PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 15:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:44:22PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
The negative effect for the users is
* GOTO Masanori wrote:
AFAIK, the unresolved difficult bugs are: (1) hppa build (2) dpkg
(setjmp/longjmp) on sparc (3) NIS (will be fixed?) (4) misterious
apache on ia64 bug. Note that (3) becomes ok to revert patches, (4)
may be non-glibc bug. Well, they are still something hard work. :-)
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to start
depending on it.
Indeed, it's looking likely that GregKH's `udev' will replace devfs
sometime in the future.
[It was amusing to see Christoph Hellwig's recent patch on the lkml
Quoting Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
consensus
n : agreement of the majority in sentiment or belief
[syn: {general agreement}]
unanimity
n : everyone being of one mind
A world of difference.
No, no, no! You don't get it. There may be a
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: horde-sam
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : The Horde Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://cvs.horde.org/cvs.php/sam/
* License : GPL
Description : Spamassassin module for
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: phpdocumentor
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Joshua Eichorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.phpdocumentor.org/
* License : PHP
Description : php auto
From Netcraft newsletter and web site:
Debian Linux distribution 10 years old today
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/08/16/debian_linux_distribution_10_years_old_today.html
I'm not so sure about the value of their Debian geographical
distribution, maybe... :-)
bye
Christian
--
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-21
Followup-For: Bug #206536
As Thomas said, the right URL is http://www.phpdoc.org, not
http://www.phpdocumentor.org.
Thank you very much, Thomas.
Regards.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel:
Quoting Christian Surchi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
From Netcraft newsletter and web site:
Debian Linux distribution 10 years old today
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/08/16/debian_linux_distribution_10_years_old_today.html
I'm not so sure about the value of their Debian geographical
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:59:30AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote:
From Netcraft newsletter and web site:
Debian Linux distribution 10 years old today
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/08/16/debian_linux_distribution_10_years_old_today.html
I'm not so sure about the value of their
Hi
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:56:34PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:57:06PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
Who is interested in stack protection?
x86 only? Pro police is the most platform independent iirc.
I think it would be good to have some experiments of stack
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 19:13, Stefan Gybas wrote:
However, ProPolice has not been ported to all architectures yet, see
http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/statuschart.html
for details.
Not being ported to all architectures is not a problem IMHO.
Such stack protection should not
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: nicotine
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Hyriand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://nicotine.thegraveyard.org/
* License : GPL
Description : feature complete client
On Thursday 21 August 2003 13:36, Christian Perrier wrote:
I like having a significant following in the former Iron Curtain
countries. So the two major former Iron Curtain countries seem to
be France and Germany.. :-)
Well, part of Germany was on the far side of the Iron Curtain regardless of
* Goswin von Brederlow
| There is also another reason, not mentioned before, for source only
| uploads. It takes way less bandwith to upload a diff.gz+dsc file than
| to upload a big binary package.
Bandwidth has costs for buildds as well.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:52:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
AFAIK, the unresolved difficult bugs are: (1) hppa build (2) dpkg
(setjmp/longjmp) on sparc (3) NIS (will be fixed?) (4) misterious
apache on ia64 bug.
Is there a bug# for (2)? If not, could someone forward the appropriate
mails
cobaco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2003-08-20 15:33, John Goerzen wrote:
tne pain of breaking desktops is no less when
you consider how many more desktops we're talking about here.
that's assuming that all those desktops crash at the same time no?
No, it's assuming that all those desktops
Citat Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Christian Surchi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
From Netcraft newsletter and web site:
Debian Linux distribution 10 years old today
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/08/16/debian_linux_distribution_10_years_old_today.html
I'm not so
Who is interested in stack protection?
I am.
I think it would be good to have some experiments of stack protected packages
for Debian. Probably the best way to do this would be to start with
ssh-stack and sysklogd-stack being uploaded to experimental. I don't have
time to do this, but I
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-19
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: livejournal
Version : 2003042200
Upstream Author : Brad Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.livejournal.com/code
*
Russell Coker wrote:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 19:13, Stefan Gybas wrote:
However, ProPolice has not been ported to all architectures yet, see
http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/statuschart.html
for details.
Not being ported to all architectures is not a problem IMHO.
Such stack
Are we expecting the latest unstalble gcc compiler to correctly
compiler the kernel?
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 20030812 (Debian prerelease)
I'm getting a new error when I compile the kernel. In the structure
below, it doesn't like the declaration for slot_tablen complaining
that
Steve Langasek wrote:
- It will now be possible to choose md5 vs. crypt passwords at install
time without violating policy. (Currently, a number of conffiles are
being modified by maintainer scripts in order to enable md5
passwords.) Actually making this process policy-compliant will
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:37:40AM -0700, Marc Singer wrote:
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 20030812 (Debian prerelease)
I'm getting a new error when I compile the kernel. In the structure
below, it doesn't like the declaration for slot_tablen complaining
that
ide-cd.h:440: error:
__u8 short slot_tablelen;
Isn't it just a plain error? Either it's a char, or it's a short. It
can't be both, right?
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Op do 21-08-2003, om 09:49 schreef Russell Coker:
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:39, Xavier Roche wrote:
Major issues for a ro-/ are maybe:
- using devfs for /dev (kernel 2.4 and package devfsd installed)
Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to start
depending on it.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:39:35AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
I am only realistic. When in history did a non-trivial software
product meet its release schedule?
I am surely hoping for the best, but I seriously do expect sarge to be
released in early 2004. Which is a pretty good track record
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 07:16:46PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to start
depending on it.
Indeed, it's looking likely that GregKH's `udev' will replace devfs
sometime in the future.
We musn't let the bigots decide for us! ;-)
Sorry, but that insult doesn't put a winksmiley on my face.
Please don't try to start a useless flamewar. They break
out so easily on their own. There is no need to discuss
this matter here; it has already been thoroughly discussed
in debian-legal
On 21 Aug 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Doogie already said he wants to implement a smart comparator for deb
in dpkg 2.0 which would then be used to compare that different builds
of the binary-all even give the same result.
This means you give the 2 debs(which probably only differ by
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 22:41, Brian May wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 07:16:46PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to
start depending on it.
Indeed, it's looking likely that GregKH's `udev'
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 05:52:32PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
AFAIK, the unresolved difficult bugs are: (1) hppa build (2) dpkg
(setjmp/longjmp) on sparc (3) NIS (will be fixed?) (4) misterious
apache on ia64 bug.
Is there a bug# for (2)? If
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:44:11PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
__u8 short slot_tablelen;
Isn't it just a plain error? Either it's a char, or it's a short. It
can't be both, right?
That's what I think, too. It looks, too, to be something added in a
patch because the indentation is
Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Talk with the maintainer. Or NMU. Or make noise on -devel.
But don't fork packages.
I agree and disagree. Talking with the maintainer works
sometimes. Sometimes one is in a position to NMU. Sometimes
it helps to make noise on debian-devel. But
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:53:12AM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
FU Dmitry Borodaenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FU libyaml-ruby1.8 (- libyaml-ruby)
I think that since whytheluckystiff is developing Syck/YAML right in the
Ruby CVS, there is little chance for a separation of libyaml-ruby1.8 in
the near
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:42:28AM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003, Steve Langasek wrote:
But descriptions can be deceiving. Does anyone use this package who
could comment on its reliability? Does the lack of other bugs indicate
that the software is mature and stable, or
Jérôme Marant dijo [Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:18:10PM +0200]:
consensus
n : agreement of the majority in sentiment or belief
[syn: {general agreement}]
unanimity
n : everyone being of one mind
A world of difference.
No, no, no! You don't get it.
* Martin Quinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:03:17PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
I doubt a poor translation would make it into a released version.
A lot of poor translation get into stable, mainly by lack of manwork, but
you are right no offending translation gets
* Martin Quinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Judging from the amount of translation rotting in the BTS, I guess some of
you guys react the same way, and I want to change this by easing this trust
relationship, if possible.
Eh. Personally I tend to doubt it's lack of trust that's causing
Christian Perrier dijo [Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:36:02PM +0200]:
Wow.According to this chart, about a third of hosts running Debian
are in France.. :-)
For sure, several major web hosting and Internet Access Providers run
Debian hosts for their key servers herebut I think this graph
On Aug 21, Xavier Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- using devfs for /dev (kernel 2.4 and package devfsd installed)
devfs will probably disappear. It's better to look at udev (which I'm
packaging).
- transforming several /etc files as symlinks and moving them to some
other place (/var/etc ?)
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 03:05:00PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
But sometimes there are fundamental disagreements about how something
should be packaged and then it must be possible for two competing
packages to exist in Debian
Says who?
Debian is not just a collection of packages, it's a
Well, I know that in postinst and prerm, but when which argument is
passed?
I thought that cd /var/lib/dpkg/info grep -10 update-alternatives
*postinst|less -S
would help me, but it did quite the contrary. There is a total mess!
A quick summary of how it is called in different packages:
-
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:18:10PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
We musn't let the bigots decide for us! ;-)
Thanks for excusing yourself from the discussion thus.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Software engineering: that part of
Debian GNU/Linux | computer
Hi all,
The main goal of this party was to translate Debian package descriptions.
Unfortunately Gluck, where the ddts server is, was down quite a long
time and installing a local server was not so easy as it was the first
time I did this. The local server was up only a few minutes before Gluck
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:05:01PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
So, all mails sent to bugs with release-critical severities, including
acknowledgements of control messages, will now be copied to a new
list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very nice!
--
Jamin W. Collins
To be nobody but yourself when the
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:41:16PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Indeed, it's looking likely that GregKH's `udev' will replace devfs
sometime in the future.
Dare I ask the obvious question: what is udev? Why is it better then
devfs?
It's mostly in user-space, lighter-weight, and more
I retain hope that this discussion can end in agreement on the
issue raised in #156161. Toward that end I offer the following
interpretation of what has been said and finally a proposal.
The original question was about how to prevent services from
being started. Some packages employ a mechanism
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
