Package: general
Severity: normal
When installing Debian from the small net-install CD it shouldn't ask for the
installation
media by default in aptitude. This is small but kind of irritating when
working on a fresh
debian system in remotely.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
Therefore we did not make progress since the beginning of the
discussion:
You're trying to make progress somewhere where it's not expected.
- The most efficient way to deal with changes to the sources for the
packager is to use his preferred
Your message dated Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:06:14 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#467258: general: Net-install CD still defaults to
asking for CD in aptitude
has caused the Debian Bug report #467258,
regarding general: Net-install CD still defaults to asking for CD in
Hi Ian,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
There is in my opinion no reason why this code should not be merged
into sid's dpkg immediately - although there may be some merge
conflicts by now. (I haven't been playing merge catch-up since I
don't presently feel that my changes are going
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:10 PM, William Pitcock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'll be happy to help with this package.
Hi, I'll help with this package too, because I use Mercurial everyday.
Let's maintain it
I intend to take over gpsk31 package maintenance from the previous
maintainer, Carlos Barros. I think this would be more convenient as I
am also the upstream maintainer.
Carlos, I you read this please respond if you object.
Thanks,
Joop pa3aba at debian dot org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 10:53:55AM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
(BTW. there is no need to CC me with your answers, I did not ask for
that as I am subscribed to the list :-)
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 12:50:46AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
quilt is way more powerful to refresh patches
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 12:30 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:10 PM, William Pitcock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'll be happy to help with this package.
Hi, I'll help with
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am interested in pcc for several months, so I intend to package
it in Debian.
* Package name: pcc
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Author : Anders Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
Hello:
bubulle wrote:
We still have a few games of the nineties in the archive which make
interesting claims such as high speed or nice graphics and would
just seem like jokes on 21st century machines or compared to 21st
century games..:-)'
hm - expect that Go
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:31:32PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Here are some things that occur to me quickly:
I'll be just pointing to existing tools I'm aware of that are related to
your points. People probably already know all of them, but since I'm a
bit surprised to not having them mentioned
John H. Robinson, IV writes (Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal):
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
echo() { /bin/echo $@ }
echo() { /bin/echo ${1+$@}; }
I believe you mean.
Why ?!
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Bas Zoetekouw writes (Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages):
Why a recommends? In order to satisfy the spirit of policy (every
binary must have a man page) it would need to be a depends, imo.
I think the point of policy is to ensure the manpage exists, not to
require that it be installed.
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 14:00 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV writes (Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal):
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
echo() { /bin/echo $@ }
echo() { /bin/echo ${1+$@}; }
I believe you mean.
Why ?!
Because stand-alone $@ is undefined when
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 08:30 -0600, William Pitcock wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 14:00 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV writes (Re: dash bug which is affecting release
goal):
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
echo() { /bin/echo $@ }
echo() { /bin/echo ${1+$@}; }
I
John Goerzen writes (Re: the new style mass tirage of bugs):
Here's the thing. If bugs I submit actually get looked at by a human, and
humans are fixing a reasonable percentage of bugs submitted, I don't mind
testing things out on new versions whenever I can.
I think this is a key point.
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: dpkg-buildpackage now reorganizing debian/control
Depends field??):
I won't revert anything unless you come up with some proof that this
causes severe issues that will disturb the lenny release process.
I think this is the wrong approach.
Surely you should revert
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:57 PM, William Pitcock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 12:30 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:10 PM, William Pitcock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance):
However you haven't made it easy to merge your code... you repository is a
mess to proof-read and the cleaning work that you don't want to do has
thus to be done by Guillem.
This is precisely the git bikeshedding I was
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance):
Guillem has some responsibility in the delay here but he's perfectly aware
of it. I've been nagging him a bit to merge your work and he told us that
he has been orphaning other packages to be able to work more on dpkg.
I
Le Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:47:05AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
- When modifying a package that uses dpatch, quilt or simple-patchsys,
developpers have to find out by themselves if the target for patching
the sources is patch, apply-patches or apply-dpatches.
Once the new
William Pitcock wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 12:30 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are many good DD's around the Python Applications Packaging
Team and the Debian Python Modules Team, because generally,
this
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 15:59 +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
William Pitcock wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 12:30 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are many good DD's around the Python Applications Packaging
On 2/24/08, William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 14:00 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV writes (Re: dash bug which is affecting release
goal):
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
echo() { /bin/echo $@ }
echo() { /bin/echo ${1+$@}; }
I
* William Pitcock:
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 14:00 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV writes (Re: dash bug which is affecting release goal):
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
echo() { /bin/echo $@ }
echo() { /bin/echo ${1+$@}; }
I believe you mean.
Why ?!
Because stand-alone
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:19:50PM +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
Now, if I could run an 'apt-get source -t unstable foo' and create
my patch against the resulting source package, and be sure that the
maintainer won't reject it on the grounds of the patch not being
against the head (or latest,
Vincent Danjean wrote:
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the DSCM mercurial.
At this moment, I do not have lot of free time. Moreover, I'm not a
big user of mercurial anymore (I often use git that I find less
intuitive but more powerful).
So I'm looking for co-maintainer of this package. I
Package: gtkimageview
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: normal
gtkimageview 1.6.0 has been released. I have written Perl bindings,
but they only compile against the new version, so I would appreciate
the new version of the library being packaged so that I can do the
same for the Perl bindings.
I would
Jarg Sommer writes (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance):
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
24 Oct 2007 - Raphael Hertzog asks me to `git-rebase', edit the email
address in my git commit logs, and so forth, allegedly
in order to make my changes easier
* Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080224 09:18]:
Bas Zoetekouw writes (Re: QUESTION: Debian Policy: Manual pages):
Why a recommends? In order to satisfy the spirit of policy (every
binary must have a man page) it would need to be a depends, imo.
I think the point of policy is to ensure the
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:03:01PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
If there are sets of usertags which are in common use by a reasonable
number of diverse packages, and are something that would normally be
put on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] user (that is to say, make them
visible by default) then file a
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
But for the reasons which were discussed at length on debian-dpkg in
October, this is not a good idea. Sadly I was not able to persuade
Raphael.
Given that many of us work on the kernel, some of us are both upstream and
downstream in git, and therefore
Le dimanche 24 février 2008 à 01:15 +0100, Michael Biebl a écrit :
Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:00:43PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
I updated it:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-scicomp/eficas/trunk/debian/control?op=filerev=0sc=0
Is it ok for do you want me to
Apologies for messing around with this bug - I seem to be having a bit
of finger/brain trouble
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 16:46 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Yet, rebasing is still routinely performed in the Linux kernel
development.
What I find interesting and rather amusing here is Linus talking
negatively about rebase: in particular its propensity to turn tested
code (what
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 09:08:23 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:46:03 -0500, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This argument assumes that dpkg-source -x will apply that patch stack
automatically as well, which has been discussed elsewhere.
Currently
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:49:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Jarg Sommer writes (Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance):
Ian Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
24 Oct 2007 - Raphael Hertzog asks me to `git-rebase', edit the email
address in my git commit logs, and so
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:20:55 -0500, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:08:23AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Now, you are trying to make me go towards a mechanism I think is
inferior (a liner, dependent, and in my opinion, opaque, and somewhat
shaky linear
David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Il giorno Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:04:52 -0300
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
As I said, for APT, the order has meaning _always_.
apt-get install foo bar
Is completely different of
apt-get install bar foo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: libisoburn
Version: 0.1.0
Upstream Author: Vreixo Formoso [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thomas Schmitt [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
URL: http://libburnia-project.org
License: GPL
Description:
Fiz, can you help me for this? Would you be interested, as upstream
author, to help maintaining an *official* Debian package for your
software?
It would be great for me :)
what files do you need?
How do you want me to send you the files?
best regards
signature.asc
Description: Esta
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 16:46 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Yet, rebasing is still routinely performed in the Linux kernel
development.
What I find interesting and rather amusing here is Linus talking
negatively about rebase: in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mario Limonciello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: gmyth-upnp
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Alexsandro Jose Virginio dos Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallyson Luiz de Morais Melo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 07:46:59PM +, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
But for the reasons which were discussed at length on debian-dpkg in
October, this is not a good idea. Sadly I was not able to persuade
Raphael.
Given that many of us
Anders Kaseorg and I created a system of CDBS modules (which we've
tentatively packaged as the config-package-dev package) for creating
Debian configuration packages. By configuration packages, we mean
packages that configure an existing Debian system by applying dpkg-divert
to configuration
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
No matter what you want to say about your feature branches, you
*must* apply them in a linear fashion to your final source tree
that you ship in the package. This is no way around it.
But there is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: sakura
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : David Gómez Espinosa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.pleyades.net/david/sakura.php
* License : (GPL)
Programming Lang: (C, C++)
Timothy G Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anders Kaseorg and I created a system of CDBS modules (which we've
tentatively packaged as the config-package-dev package) for creating
Debian configuration packages. By configuration packages, we mean
packages that configure an existing Debian
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But there is no such linearization, not in the way that
quilt et al do it. The state of such integration is not maintained
in the feature branches; it is in the history of the integration
branch.
Is
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
For having worked quite a bit in git.git (I sent my 100th patch that
should go upstream on yesterday), I can tell that it's not true. I mean,
the very people designing git, are also the one using it in the kernel
developpement, and look at git
I'll note that we wrap our dpkg-divert calls with a bunch of
error-handling code that we found quite important for correctly recovering
from people hitting ^C in the middle of installation (see
http://debathena/config-packages/code/config-package-dev-4.2/divert.sh.in
for the code). Earlier
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 05:10:16PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But there is no such linearization, not in the way that
quilt et al do it. The state of such integration is not maintained
in the
Tim Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We also ran into a few packages which will overwrite configuration files
that they manage via debconf, overwriting our symlink every time the
relevant package is upgraded. But I think that's a bug in those Debian
packages, since the same problem would
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is that you and Manoj assume that this is the only way to do
things. I don't believe this. Pierre Habouzit has been experimenting
with an alternative method of feature branches that exports to a linear
stack of diffs just fine. Just because
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:08:17PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is that you and Manoj assume that this is the only way to do
things. I don't believe this. Pierre Habouzit has been experimenting
with an alternative method of feature
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:34:55 +1100, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
No matter what you want to say about your feature branches, you
*must* apply them in a linear fashion to your final source tree
that
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Tim Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We also ran into a few packages which will overwrite configuration files
that they manage via debconf, overwriting our symlink every time the
relevant package is upgraded. But I think that's a bug in those Debian
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:17:10 -0500, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 06:08:17PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is that you and Manoj assume that this is the only way
to do things. I don't believe this. Pierre
Tim Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Configuration files generated by debconf may not be manually changed
without running this risk, including by humans. Generally, this is
documented in the file. I have several of those in packages I
maintain.
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:03:01PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
If there are sets of usertags which are in common use by a reasonable
number of diverse packages, and are something that would normally be
put on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] user (that is
Hi,
I think one of the differences that patch series mechanism has
wrt to new development, either in a feature or upstream, is that it
requires updates to the integration work doe every single upload. It
also requires a strict ordering between each feature, making it harder
to compile
Le Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:55:08AM +0100, Florian Lohoff a écrit :
The mipsel buildd rem has a new disk and the buildd dir will be moved
which will speed it up a lot (PIO vs DMA)
Dear Florian,
this is good news: we can see mipsel getting better on the buildd stats:
On 24/02/08 at 20:41 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:03:01PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
If there are sets of usertags which are in common use by a reasonable
number of diverse packages, and are something that would normally be
put on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] user
also sprach Sam Hocevar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.02.24.1316 +0100]:
I also would like to spend some Debian money on a contest, similar to
the FreeBSD logo contest [2], to create a friendly mascot for the Debian
project (in a similar way to the Linux penguin or the GNU gnu) that we
can use
also sprach Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.02.22.1627 +0100]:
I am not sure you have understood feature branches. They are
independent, no matter what the overlap. Each feature branch tracks one
feature against upstream, no matter how the other features work.
The
On su, 2008-02-24 at 19:48 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Sam Hocevar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.02.24.1316 +0100]:
I also would like to spend some Debian money on a contest, similar to
the FreeBSD logo contest [2], to create a friendly mascot for the Debian
project (in a similar
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:07:20AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
We had a chicken[¹]. We spent years actively getting rid of it.
[¹] Technically speaking it was a penguin. But it was a youthful
penguin, rebelling against its genetic heritage.
LCA2009 has a tasmanian devil pretending to be
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:07:20 +0200, Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On su, 2008-02-24 at 19:48 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Sam Hocevar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.02.24.1316 +0100]:
I also would like to spend some Debian money on a contest,
similar to
the FreeBSD
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:04:21 +0100, martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
also sprach Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008.02.22.1627
+0100]:
I am not sure you have understood feature branches. They are
independent, no matter what the overlap. Each feature branch tracks
one feature
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:47:05AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
- When modifying a package that uses dpatch, quilt or simple-patchsys,
developpers have to find out by themselves if the target for patching
the sources is patch,
Hi,
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
I like the reduced work for each upload, and since it satisfies
the use cases of being able to present upstream with a pure feature
changeset;
It doesn't satisfy it completely. You can always generate a patch for
a pure feature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:31:04 +0100
Source: libconfig-general-perl
Binary: libconfig-general-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.37-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Francesco Cecconi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:08:45 +0100
Source: octave2.1-forge
Binary: octave2.1-forge
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2006.03.17+dfsg1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Octave Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:36:23 +0100
Source: tracker
Binary: tracker libtrackerclient0 libtrackerclient-dev libtracker-gtk0
libtracker-gtk-dev tracker-utils tracker-search-tool libdeskbar-tracker
tracker-dbg
Architecture: source all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:45:29 +
Source: cdebootstrap
Binary: cdebootstrap cdebootstrap-static cdebootstrap-udeb
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:29:54 +0100
Source: win32-loader
Binary: win32-loader
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Millan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:21:51 +0100
Source: python-scipy
Binary: python-scipy
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6.0-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Ondrej
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:43:38 +0200
Source: samizdat
Binary: samizdat libsamizdat-ruby libsamizdat-ruby1.8
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.6.0.20080224-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dmitry Borodaenko [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:22:54 +0100
Source: mesa
Binary: libgl1-mesa-swx11 libgl1-mesa-swx11-dbg libgl1-mesa-swx11-i686
libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-glx-dbg libgl1-mesa-dri
libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg libgl1-mesa-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:31:11 +0100
Source: lua-gtk
Binary: liblua5.1-gtk-0 liblua5.1-gtk-dev
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.8+20080222-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Enrico Tassi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:59:05 +0100
Source: doc-base
Binary: doc-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:49:04 +1300
Source: ifrench
Binary: ifrench myspell-fr
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 1.4-22
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Francois Marier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Francois Marier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:45:41 +0600
Source: smplayer-themes
Binary: smplayer-themes
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1.15.dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matvey Kozhev [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:57:16 +0100
Source: freevo
Binary: freevo python-freevo freevo-data freevo-lirc freevo-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.0~rc1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Freevo Debian Dream Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:02:01 +0100
Source: ledit
Binary: ledit
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.00-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Julien Cristau [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:49:32 +0100
Source: dwww
Binary: dwww
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.10.11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:25:26 +0100
Source: ipolish
Binary: ipolish wpolish myspell-pl
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 20080222-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Robert Luberda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Robert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:40:03 +0300
Source: ejabberd
Binary: ejabberd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.0-3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sergei Golovan [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:20:33 +0100
Source: gnome-pkg-tools
Binary: gnome-pkg-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.13.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Josselin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:05:06 +0100
Source: bluez-gnome
Binary: bluez-gnome
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.22-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Bluetooth Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Filippo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:48:31 +0100
Source: ov51x-jpeg
Binary: ov51x-jpeg-source
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Romain Beauxis [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:31:56 +0100
Source: ascii
Binary: ascii
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.8-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:00:45 +
Source: libmail-field-received-perl
Binary: libmail-field-received-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.24-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dominic Hargreaves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:45:21 +0100
Source: cl-rsm-rsa
Binary: cl-rsm-rsa
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3+cvs.2004.03.30
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:49:47 +0100
Source: cl-ptester
Binary: cl-ptester
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:06:14 +0100
Source: cl-rsm-bool-comp
Binary: cl-rsm-bool-comp
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter Van
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:57:12 +0100
Source: cl-quick-arrays
Binary: cl-quick-arrays
Architecture: source all
Version: 20080224
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:16:43 +0100
Source: cl-rsm-finance
Binary: cl-rsm-finance
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:17:55 +0100
Source: cl-rsm-fuzzy
Binary: cl-rsm-fuzzy
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:44:58 +0100
Source: cl-screamer
Binary: cl-screamer
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.24.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
