Sean 'Shaleh' Perry schrieb:
as long as lograte can be installed first, then I can later
install auditd and everything will just work, sure.
I can't use logrotate with msyslog, it won't work, logrotate is
just too limited. This would mean I have to move msyslog to
non-US, since I will make it
Hi
Richard Braakman schrieb:
In that case the right repository could be a bugreport to the package
involved. That way the diff submission is guaranteed.
I agree with you that _something_ has to be done about
catastrophal NMUs, but just stopping to NMU and only submitting
diffs, even on
Hi
Andres Seco Hernandez schrieb:
Are local? facilities reserved in Debian for some purpose?
I'm not aware of any reserved local facilities, however system
log daemons provide the syslog-facility(8) script which may be
used by packages to dynamically retrieve and set up a local
facility (eg
Hi
I don't know C, thus couldn't do more than keep it available.
(quick and dirty translation in [])
- Forwarded message from Stefan Eilemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 10:15:23 +0100
To: Arthur Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Stefan Eilemann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
Hi
Joey Hess schrieb:
And, anyway, caching might be done in a cronjob: look at the pagesa in
This seems to be cr^Hontrary to the idea of caching.
That's a good idea. Another route to take is to split man into the
rendering/caching bit and the command line man page lookup/processing/pager
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi schrieb:
So, I want to separate TrueType fonts and meta datas such that
fonts.scale and fonts.alias included in xfonts-xtt-*.
C'mon, it wont do any harm to ppl who are using LaTeX but not
X11 if they have fonts.scale and fonts.alias installed but
unused. They are not larger
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi schrieb:
For example, if ttf-xtt-* includes meta datas(fonts.alias,
fonts.scale, tfm and so on) and when only fonts.alias update and
upload. A user would download ttf-xtt-* package (include other files,
they are not updated), if the user use the package only for TeX (not
hi
Peter Makholm schrieb:
for package in dpkg apt libc gpg bplay etc ; do
sed [...] bug.template | mail ;
done
You'd better use [EMAIL PROTECTED], else you need a very
good asbestos suit ...
ciao, 2ri
Hi
Hamish Moffatt schrieb:
Package X and package Y are not truely unrelated if they share any
dynamic libraries, though, eg libc.
So do you have any suggestion as to how this could actually be
implemented? Even if it's actually desirable (which I dispute),
implementation seems far from
Hi
Brian May schrieb:
Hamish == Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hamish On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 11:13:13AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
However, the idea of one UID per daemon is (IMHO) a really
horrible solution, too, as you end up having more UIDs for
daemons then
Joey Hess schrieb:
Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
I just noticed that `apache-doc' puts the documentation under
http://.../doc/apache;, while `debconf-doc' puts it under
http://.../debconf-doc/;.
Eh? (Debconf-doc is a package, that contains some documentation files.
It doesn't touch the
Hi
Mark Seaborn schrieb:
I want a system where I can install multiple versions of a library (or
any package really) and say which version I want each program on the
system to use, possibly on a per-user basis. The present system is a
disaster waiting to happen: If I install a package from
Peter S Galbraith schrieb:
My current problem with apt-move is that it wants to delete every
single deb file I have
For my archive it was to late:
19M /home/pub/debian
That was ~250M before ... oops. Time to use http and squid
instead ...
ciao, 2ri
--
Note that there are two possible
David Starner schrieb:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote:
my main server is potato. is it bad for me to be building packages
there if they are destined for woody? should i start building on
Paul Slootman schrieb:
On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
Debhelper (and one of the other helper things) does this, if you
don't call dh_installinit with the --no-restart-on-upgrade (or such)
option. I guess the reasoning is that (a) you're upgrading in multiuser
mode because debian
Hello.
Adrian Bunk schrieb:
My suggestion for the Packages file is:
There's a Packages.bz2 additionally to the Packages.gz . apt downloads by
default the Packages.bz2, but you can tell apt to fetch the Packages.gz
instead if you do have a slow machine. This solution has the advantage
that
Hello.
Alisdair McDiarmid schrieb:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 01:49:13PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
you always have the option of using 'apt-get source' to recompile a package,
then place it on hold and we wont touch it.
I've tried doing this occasionally -- more often to change a
Hello.
Anand Kumria schrieb:
Not having the helper packages included in the autobuild system appears to
benefit, at most, around ~470 packages.
May I ask how they benefit?
It's only a (little) burden on the packages that use debhelper,
but I can't see any benefits for packages not using it.
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
