* Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org [121013 10:56]:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 09:17:32AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
part at all) will only weaken security. So I think what you say is an
argument for keeping md5sum, so that noone think they can use that
information for security
sha2 sums on
their own and use them. Using the debsums system (which has no security
part at all) will only weaken security. So I think what you say is an
argument for keeping md5sum, so that noone think they can use that
information for security.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
picture as obsolete and/or legacy
and thus not worth to support.
So users outside Debian would profit more to push patches to all
programs to properly prefer HOME instead of hoping to persuade upstream
of the library (and Debian would profit from having a smaller diff).
Bernhard R. Link
.)
The documentation for g_get_home_dir[1] also documents what a
proper program can do, it's a simple:
const char *homedir = g_getenv (HOME);
if (!homedir)
homedir = g_get_home_dir ();
instead of using get_get_home_dir directly.
Bernhard R. Link
(And tip of the day: If you are working
usually be kept away from chroots?
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120921232531.ga20...@client.brlink.eu
a good solution
( if you want to make it even better, you can set up a regular
private rebuild on that architecture to make sure it still is
buildable all the time... ;- )
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
architecture is just
a case of a serious bug that does not yet show up on the more common
architectures or only very seldom, but lurking in the dark, waiting
till it can also hit your more users later if ignored now.
Bernhard R. Link
[1] As a C program can give very little information, almost
. (There is a lot of unmaintained
software out there, but as I said, not much difference to getting
any other patch in).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
of our users,
perhaps they are not really a loss. /scnr
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120818174632.ga8...@client.brlink.eu
. things
that already show a mime type before you open it) is simply
introducing a security bug.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:30:12 +0200
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.12.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 16:52:42 +0200
Source: tinyirc
Binary: tinyirc
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:1.1.dfsg.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 16:36:55 +0200
Source: fracplanet
Binary: fracplanet
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link
. After you were closing two bug reports by just dismissing the
issue, a if that gets closed again is a totally objective way to
describe expectations.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Package name: acpi-support-minimal
License : GPL2+
Description: minimal scripts for handling base ACPI events
This package contains minimal scripts to react to various base
ACPI events such as the power
into LDFLAGS or or or.
It's all mostly trivially done but there are quite a number of variants.
Anything not having CPPFLAGS is usually simply so non-standard that
a human has to look at it anyway and no automatic approach will help.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
not using make but some python or shell script to do the actual
compilation or any other of the many strange things found in software
packages.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:04:55 +0200
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.12.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
it will preprocess anything, pass CPPFLAGS.
Note that CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS are in the format as you need to
give them to gcc/g++, i.e. every ld option not understood by
gcc needs a -Wl, and so on...
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
by
Autoconf. However, it is now embedded into the implicit rules of GNU Make,
so every Makefile that doesn't override the rule for compiling a .c file
to a .o file uses CPPFLAGS.
Where now means since 1990.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
to have happened).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120613163535.ga30...@client.brlink.eu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:39:54 +0200
Source: git-dpm
Binary: git-dpm
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:07:01 +0200
Source: xtrace
Binary: xtrace
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:44:11 +0200
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.12.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 22:58:53 +0200
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.12.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
once its configuration is complete) means I have to
tweak another config file, which is uncessary annoying work.
Bernhard R. Link
[1] Exceptions being specific things like unconfigured dhcp servers,
but I never met one that would run by default as it first needs a subnet
configured. But if I
repeating others here).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120603115132.ga4...@client.brlink.eu
to configure /tmp differently, the user is
able to set TMPDIR differently.
my 0.02:
I personally think having tmpdir on /tmp might be a good default for
new systems. If systems get changed to that from something else on
upgrade without asking, I consider that quite an ugly bug.
Bernhard R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:09:02 +0200
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.12.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
is: don't use it, it's an ugly hack.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120519090516.ga5...@client.brlink.eu
a source tree. Which is
why I use it exclusively to work on my 3.0 (quilt) packages.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:28:03 +0200
Source: libnss-extrausers
Binary: libnss-extrausers
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R
within itself. Requiring patched being
able to applied without any magic (which might hide mistakes and
result in changes different from the intended ones) is a reasonable
thing to do.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Description:
libntl-dev - Number Theory Library, development files
libntl0- Number Theory Library, shared library
Closes: 667300
Changes:
ntl (5.5.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* add more optional symbols to avoid
failure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 12:14:26 +0200
Source: git-dpm
Binary: git-dpm
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:35:28 +0200
Source: libnss-extrausers
Binary: libnss-extrausers
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R
or will be overruled by the
TC at the end.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120502124909.gb18...@server.brlink.eu
* Russ Allbery r...@debian.org [120501 18:18]:
David Bremner brem...@debian.org writes:
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
My suggestion to everyone feeling the need to tell anyone on a public
mailing list that they should shut up because they are no contributors
is thus: Please
their arguments because you they are
not insiders, which this is from some point of view, is the noise that
makes an discussion in my eyes the most unwelcoming and thus a good
reason to only expect noise and no more signal.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120501095606.ga2...@client.brlink.eu
chance to come back to it till the discussion will be over, but
once that point is reached there really is no sense it keeping it up.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
='$(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)' or
CFLAGS='$(CPPFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS)' or even something like
CFLAGS='$(CPPFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS)'.
So what we have is already the most efficient default and also the only
one always working.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:07:52 +0200
Source: git-dpm
Binary: git-dpm
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:23:49 +0200
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.11.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
* Markus Wanner mar...@bluegap.ch [120414 13:32]:
On 04/14/2012 11:22 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Sure, they are also much more common than GLR. And if you are just
interested in parsing and not a computer scientists, there's a chance
you've never heard about any of them.
Based on two votes for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:38:14 +0200
Source: libnss-extrausers
Binary: libnss-extrausers
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:01:03 +0200
Source: inoticoming
Binary: inoticoming
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:48:32 +0200
Source: git-dpm
Binary: git-dpm
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:45:11 +0200
Source: gv
Binary: gv
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.7.3.90-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:28:59 +0200
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.10.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
'?
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120321090152.ga2...@client.brlink.eu
easy way, especially because packaging
information has a canonic place and is not changed by patches.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
++ code. In the easy case of only having c++ code that
means you might need to give CXXFLAGS into a variable named CFLAGS.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
* Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi [120227 22:02]:
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
While there might be some problems originating from some architecture,
but most problems you will see and people claim to be problems specific
to fringe architectures are actual bugs in the program you just do
* Uoti Urpala uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi [120226 20:20]:
If someone complained about a nontrivial s390-specific problem in a
context where I was upstream, I'd likely ignore him. In the Debian
context, people other than porters should not be obligated to do
significant work to resolve problems
* Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no [120223 22:21]:
]] Bernhard R. Link
Your shell is most likely implemented in C, but it's not like you sit
down and have to debug it every other day. Why do you assume that you
need to do so just because policy is encoded in .ini-like files instead
of shell
* Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no [120224 10:45]:
]] Bernhard R. Link
* Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no [120223 22:21]:
]] Bernhard R. Link
Your shell is most likely implemented in C, but it's not like you sit
down and have to debug it every other day. Why do you assume that you
need
. :-)
If you want to know why something does not start then this won't help
much.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120224120746
of lots of eyes.
So software will ever be without bugs. The question is not: Will it have
bugs? The question is: What effects will bugs have?
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
working for everyone and not support systemd at all.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120223123238.ga16...@server.brlink.eu
shares to allow Linux to
actually work?
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120223155737.ga2...@client.brlink.eu
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [120223 17:34]:
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 16:57 +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it [120223 15:24]:
Not an option: we really need an events-based init system.
If you want legacy at all costs, I think that Slackware is looking
a reason against supporting systemd, not for only having it.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120223165431.gb3
not your opinion with insults I will
not take much efford to fix your packages but rather try to get the
packages I use in a working state.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 19:26:22 +0100
Source: cuyo
Binary: cuyo cuyo-data
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.0.0brl1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link
within some C daemon with
plugins, so using systemd will be quite a costly bet for most people)
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
as it would be libc6 on most architectures,
but libc6.1 or libc0.1 on others.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120214120003.gb2
...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Description:
libntl-dev - Number Theory Library, development files
libntl0- Number Theory Library, shared library
Closes: 512636 585158
Changes:
ntl (5.5.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* this is still a preview, but most likely
, which speeds up everything and avoids
unnecessary traffic.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120210094246.ga
R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120210120049.ga2...@client.brlink.eu
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [120210 14:45]:
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 13:00 +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [120209 20:45]:
There is a similar issue with linux-image-*-amd64, which I would
definitely like to remove from i386 as soon as possible
* Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org [120210 14:47]:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
Needing multi-arch enabled (with all the dangers of getting the
wrong packages installed
Multi-arch enabled apt makes it hard to install the wrong ones. Also
not modify the md5sums files, too?).
It is useful for reliability, as it checks for files being corrupted by
bad discs[1], bad memory[1], bad DMA controlers[1], ...
Bernhard R. Link
[1] Been there, got bitten, learned to love debsums.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
a program for a given mime type. (xdgopen has still not got an option
to specify the mime-type, has it?)
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120201100344.ga2...@server.brlink.eu
* Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org [120201 12:32]:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:03:44AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
It's also a pity that it is not that easy to see which packages are in
this set. Given that transitively-essential means:
- the package must be unpackaged manually
visible at symbol level.
As C++ is more likely to show differences at symbol level in this cases
the danger of cases where dpkg-symbols introduces wrong dependencies
might be lower with C++.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
the maintainer has to manually increase the versions
in the symbols file, just as they needed to increment the shlibs file
before (unless they used auto-updating by using dh_makeshlibs -V without
any version anyway)).
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 08:17:19 +0100
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.9.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:47:56 +0100
Source: cuyo
Binary: cuyo cuyo-data
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.0.0~beta3.brl1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R
but then read some other
changes of the same directory in the form of a patch places in the
same directory?
I'd say that is the exactly opposite of allows to see what the changed
of the NMU are.
So to answer you question: Yes, it is that evil.
Bernhard R. Link
[1] especially debhelper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:58:47 +0100
Source: xtrace
Binary: xtrace
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:58:00 +0100
Source: cuyo
Binary: cuyo cuyo-data
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.0.0~beta2.brl1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed
demanding volunteers to do a specific work.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120102223722.ga2...@server.brlink.eu
* Russ Allbery r...@debian.org [111231 18:41]:
Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org writes:
My experience is rather that people usually stick to their core packages
as personal property and won't except patches to make them more well
behaved.
That experience aside, we're not talking about
* Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org [111231 10:54]:
Le samedi 31 décembre 2011 à 10:23 +0100, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
If people maintain some core piece of software and want to decide what
the package looks like, listen to what other people want.
If you want to use too much work
much work as excuse, then file a RFA.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111231092302.ga2...@server.brlink.eu
* Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org [111226 12:02]:
Sorry, but what kind of argumentation is that? If the admin doesn't notice
reboots and/or file tampering, I could just replace the kernel with my
modified
one and reboot. Now of course you could increase your paranoia and boot the
kernel from
* Russell Coker russ...@coker.com.au [111226 14:16]:
For many of the things that can be done by loading a kernel module an attacker
can achieve similar goals by replacing libc or by using ptrace to install
hostile code in a long-running process that runs as root.
Except replacing libc does not
* Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name [111227 07:53]:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 06:59:07PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
It is a good thing to run with minimum privs, but compiling a new kernel
to
support this seems to be a lot of work for a fairly small benefit.
First of all it is quite
* Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de [111227 04:04]:
As you pointed out so nicely: modules_disabled is only a replacement if
you have a custom initramfs and do not allow that to be modified
automatically. So from the point of the original discussion,
modules_disabled is no solution.
You just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 20:53:58 +0100
Source: reprepro
Binary: reprepro
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:52:02 +0100
Source: gv
Binary: gv
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.7.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:18:41 +0100
Source: git-dpm
Binary: git-dpm
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:48:43 +0100
Source: tla
Binary: tla tla-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.3.5+dfsg-18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:50:33 +0100
Source: sweep
Binary: sweep sweep-dev
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.9.3-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:57:07 +0100
Source: ircii
Binary: ircii
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 20060725-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link brl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 18:45:23 +0100
Source: sweep
Binary: sweep sweep-dev
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.9.3-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Bernhard R. Link
-only window manager
I do not understand your categorisation and guess your scripts are
buggy. Why blame a recommend as specious even though the package has
a menu-method script?
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
in there (most of the time that ugliness it called libtool,
though).
When using libtool I guess it makes sense to retool it, but I think
without libtool it depends how much changes you want to do to the
build system.
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
101 - 200 of 802 matches
Mail list logo
