to get rid of the relatively
minor performance penalty of the extra FS layer.
Can Linux work with a loopback root fs, using initrd to set it up?
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info
pgpr258QC6y3r.pgp
.
--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 12:24:56PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:08:17PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:31:11AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
Why make it a separate program that runs under Windows? Why not mount
the Windows
?
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
pgprxcutj0URl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 05:23:12PM +0200, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
Le Thu, Apr 10, 2003, à 04:43:57PM +0200, Emile van Bergen a écrit:
That way you could do something like:
# echo x86-64 /etc/dpkg/legal-archs
# dpkg -i libgtk2-2.0-1_i386.deb
# dpkg -i lib64gtk2-2.0-1_x8664
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 05:27:40PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 04:43:57PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 03:33:39PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
[SNIP]
So basically, I don't think this is a very good idea. However I think we
can
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 06:23:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 10 April 2003 16:43, Emile van Bergen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 03:33:39PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
# echo x86-64 /etc/dpkg/legal-archs
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 09:42:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 11 April 2003 15:49, Emile van Bergen wrote:
You do want to allow both 32-bit and 64-bit versions of libraries to be
installed, for which you need different package names; you want to avoid
adding fields
ideas for this, but
if people feel the current way of doing things is good enough, then I
won't bother you guys with another idea lacking implementation.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
a symlink to the texmf-debian.cnf?
I.e. have a fully managed file, but leave it to the admin whether or not
his real file points to the managed file, or includes it (if possible),
or ignores it altogether.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:49:09AM -0700, Mark Rafn wrote:
That said, I'd prefer Debian NOT remove such advertising, only that we
guarantee users the right to do.
*And* distribute the result, if you want to be DFSG-free.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL
been able to convince these people to allow registration to
happen in write only memory.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
flavours of the 486.
In other words, if you use 486-compatible instructions and pentium
scheduling, you're already taking almost full advantage of the pentium.
It makes therefore little sense to group the original pentium with the
later architectures.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen
++ programmers tend to forget to conquer
while dividing.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
pgpurcLir9xvi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
just as well for 386SX as for 486SX.
Note that the SX suffix for 386 means a 16-bit external data bus
(instead of a 32-bit one for the DX), whereas for 486 the SX means no FP
included.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153
- Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
pgph51ZQB9X4u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that developer hasn't explicitly created an
interface for. The user can only do what the developer intended; no
more, no less. That is not in the best interest of our users, I'd say.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153
).
It's not that I think GUIs are bad in any way. It's just that they are
vastly overrated by a lot of people. Just because they're seen often
nowadays don't make them natural, remember that.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153
.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
pgp6E84FF9ChE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on this useful initiative?
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
pgpQePf62zWoU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that
is practical and useful, seems a good thing for all parties concerned.
And no, IANADD.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
pgpM3uXEUAtYx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:48:49AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:07:12PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
[...]
Regardless, I actually think it's a wonderful scaleability measure
to provide some infrastructure that allows DDs to delegate some
say?
After all, if I understand correctly, the service is more intended for
use by sponsors who would upload them into unstable after checking, than
directly for users.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e
what do you propose then, to drop everything just because you
cynically point out that a lot of rules are being violated today?
Or were you just trolling?
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
not be as it is
today.
Yes, most notably the spam levels would be much more bearable.
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Of course, that's also an argument /for/ translating mail server
documentation.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153
Hi,
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:26:38AM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
Emile van Bergen wrote:
So what do you propose then, to drop everything just because you
cynically point out that a lot of rules are being violated today?
What I'm saying is that (a lot of) these rules are archaic
, but proving to a robot that you are not *is*), there is no
need to drop any netiquette rules.
In short, I still fail to see your point.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
Hi,
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 07:14:33AM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
Emile van Bergen wrote:
However, I fail to understand why you want people to refrain from
bringing the netiquette under the attention of the people they are
receiving email from.
Never said they should refrain. I do think
as a substitute for properly set up
filesystem permissions.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
pgpuM75iqCpsm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
asked. I think GWB is a 'good fellow'.
Yes. Too bad he didn't happily stay being a good fellow on his ranch in
Texas.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
pgpaRtbeDPTJj.pgp
Description
other libraries. IOW,
there's no automatic way to create all these lib64* packages from
source.
Have I summarised this correctly?
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
pgp7VIRUBBmvE.pgp
$ grep '^Description: [a-z]' /var/lib/dpkg/available | wc -l
1262
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
- Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
pgpeChrcNkxJV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, no paging.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
candidate to create such a package.
HTH,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
pgpj0yHadjySe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
in
harmonizing the various documentation licenses, that serves Free
Software and Our Users.
Free Software is definitely served by standards and documentation, and
convenient off line access to them.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 12:06:03AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Anybody else get a bad cryptographic signature on the message to which I
am replying?
AOL.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
name.
Also, the clause is about appropriately identifying a file as such when
distributing a modified copy. No perverse combination of law and license
should be able prevent you from installing it on your own system under a
file name of your choice.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen
is a good alternative, I'd say.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:38:12AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:56:32PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
I object to this ITP. Not very strongly, but I still object.
I think it's a wonderful idea to have a decss package in Debian. If
Debian cannot
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:01:29PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:48:55PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:38:12 -0500
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:56:32PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
I
, it needs a volunteer who can scratch
his or her itch by doing this work. This may actually be one of the
bigger problems. Most developers who can do the work have gotten used to
the idiom and badly worded error messages.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED
really hate it when the UI drags me down ('open
folder, open subfolder, click on file, type Ctrl-C, open other folder,
type Ctrl-V', it's just horrible). The computer should wait for me, not
the other way around!
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:15:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 21:38:19 +0200
Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apple has a great way of doing that. They don't dumb down, they don't
belittle you, they assume an intelligent being who can grasp reasonably
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:06:53PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Emile van Bergen
| Hi,
|
| On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:19:53AM -0700, Ian Hickson wrote:
|
| And I would scream if you called it /_My_ Variable Data/ too... :-P
|
| I would even scream at
|
| /Variable Data
('talks SMTP') are generally not very useful.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
to an end)
I've heard our respected project secretary express a vastly different
opinion on this matter.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
entertained.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153 http://www.e-advies.nl
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:39:25PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:38:43PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:34:26PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
altruim, [sic]
Self-delusion. (It's invariably a form of 'By doing this I can
that breaks the message's MIME
structure well and thoroughly.
After bouncing, at least a virus can't take advantage of the abysmal
Outlook (Express) HTML and MIME handling anymore -- the source of at
least 95% of the world's virus problems.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen [EMAIL
transliteration)
talks a lot about it in connection to Dharma.
Self censorship is if one side of you is compelled to say something
whereas another part of you forbids it.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info
the argument that
Branden's joke could only appeal to people on his side in this debate ;-))
Same here, and I'm not exactly in favour of the GR either.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info
,
Emile.
--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info
pgpLHlwWStLQK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info
pgpw3iFnDXGRe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
be on the same IRC network at the same time.
Now for the *real* important debate: how to call it?
What about Avalon? Both a composer (well, hmm) and the place where
Excalibur was forged.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:55:56AM +0100, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote:
On Nov/27, Emile van Bergen wrote:
What about Avalon? Both a composer (well, hmm) and the place where
Excalibur was forged.
Being about forging, Orodruin comes also to mind ;-)
Yes, although there's already
Andrew is. This is totally out of bounds, in /any/ circumstance.
Thanks,
Emile.
--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info
pgpcvJkY55IGT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-free, or as free as say, ASCII or English.
Newspeak is free for non-commercial and other non-infringing uses, and
when not used to say bad things about Our President. Otherwise, please
contact the worldwite patent bureau for a RAND-license.
Bah.
Cheers,
Emile.
--
E-Advies / Emile van Bergen
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 11:47:52AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Emile van Bergen writes:
I'd say that the definition of Unicode, heck even ASCII, involves a fair
amount of creativity.
I don't doubt that the development of Unicode involved creativity: under
current law it probably
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:47:02PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:02:07PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 11:47:52AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Is it possible to create other Unicode tables that serve the same purpose
as that one
63 matches
Mail list logo
