.
Regards, Frank
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Package: emacspeak
Version: 17.0-1
Severity: severity
The copyright of emacspeak is confusing, and the package is possibly non-free:
debian/copyright claims two contradicting licenses for the
packages. The first seems to be present in some
X-Posting to -policy, because this might be a bug in Policy. I'm not
subscribed to -policy, please Cc me unless you keep -devel in.
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joel Aelwyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:32:19AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
what
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do others also think this is an error in policy? Nobody would object if
I raise severity of such a bug and address it in an NMU (which I'm going
to do for a different RC bug, anyway)?
I can answer the second question myself: According to
http
anything
about transparency?) surely is connected to different understanding of
the word problems in that context.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
that it is not possible to rationally discuss the meaning of the word
problems).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
there were some people who objected to some of the contents of the
document. But even for those it is probably better to have a Debian
package - if it's important, the discussion will take place in bug
reports, instead of not taking place.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ
? Lucky Germans, we.
Namibian scam, anybody?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Francois Bottin [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Selon Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So you think spam is the revenge for colionalism? Lucky Germans, we.
Namibian scam, anybody?
I forgot to put some irony indicators here.
Hum... From your signature I guess you are from Switzerland
I work
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[stuff]
I cannot follow you, sorry. EOT.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
every script that uses gettext.
You wouldn't need to change every script - you just need to move
gettext.sh to /usr/share/gettext/scripts and create /usr/bin/gettext.sh
with the content Sean suggested.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
sense it is sufficiently clear.
Do you think we should simply not make any use of the POSIX feature
that . $name will look for $name in the $PATH? Or do you think we should
add a directory to PATH that is then dedicated to such shell snippets?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der
-patches source version is
sufficient.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
-specific RC bugs are FTBFS, anyway.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Frank Küster wrote:
I do not understand why the Nybbles team mixed their good news about
sarge with their foreseeably controversial plans or proposal for etch.
I fear that we will have a huge, long flamewar. And many competent,
active people will start
up some stuff and do some basic testing, then release a snapshot.
This would make security support much harder. The first question above
still is interesting here.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
be able to reach tier-1 easily, but really have no reason to be on the
mirror network).
But it does *not* say that s390 is likely to be among the released
architectures. And I do not understand why.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
, though.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
% of sparc users that do use KDE, it would probably be okay
to have a separate archive for such stuff.
Regards, Frank
[1] this is just an example, I have no idea how a sparc compares to
other machines; I just read that they are today manly used for server
tasks.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst
that we know what we are
talking about.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
, and this puts again some workload on the ftpmasters
and system admins. From the Vancouver proposal it seemed to me that
it was not planned to provide such ressources.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
to be outside
Debian.
If you can provide the quality expected of a Debian/stable release, then I
don't believe anyone would object calling the result Debian/stable.
The proposal does. Or what am I reading wrong?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian
have to
recompile their stable stuff just to match the Debian revision?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
I think all this discussion about etch should be delayed until sarge is
out. Of course we would need a statement from the Nybbles team that
they do not intend to make decicions, and not to settle facts before a
thorough discussion
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Will it be possible to get the fixed-up sources reintegrated in point
releases of stable?
[don't know whether this is desirable]
All things are *possible*. What's desirable is the question.
I understood that there are reasons
is available if I'm not mistaken.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
with etch.
The plan only works (i.e. leads to a smoother release process and
prevents burnout in core teams) *if* there are less architectures in
etch.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Miros/law Baran [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
16.03.2005 pisze Adam Borowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
* Package name: ttf-antp
Version : 0.51
Upstream Author : Bogus?aw Jackowski, Janusz M. Nowacki and Piotr
Strzelczyk
* URL :
directly and who cannot?
When I got my DD account, I think it was the then most active DD on the
debian-tetex-maint list who asked the DSA to put me into the group that
own the teTeX CVS. And I guess today it's up to me if one more DD
(Henning?) wishes to get CVS access, too.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank
Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
Miros/law Baran [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
The font is included in the tetex-base package, along with other Type1
GUST-sponsored fonts (Antykwa Toru?ska etc.) - I think such a package
will be redundant
the state of free software, and it is sad that you
decide to throw in the towel because of hard language from a fellow
Debian volunteer. :(
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
at the differences?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
code for sliced bread!!!1
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
only people who send patches? To me it seems this might even discourage
newbies.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
|- cueprint: print disc and track information for a CUE or TOC file
|
| It can also be used to split a large audio file into many
| small files according to a CUE or TOC.
`
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
updated it.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 16:56 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
There is a way to cause make to re-read a Makefile: Makefile remaking.
debian/rules: debian/rules.in
$(command that recreates debian/rules) --infile $ --outfile $@
... make will reread
to hear. This would also fix #253128 and similar problems.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
this bug be handled?
I'm cc-ing -devel, because this question seems to be of general
interest. Please note that I am not subscribed to -release (but get
mail to -devel or the bug address).
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
, Frank
P.S. if somebody can point me to an alternative for wwwoffle, that would
be nice. Is polipo good? If yes, does it provide an upgrade path from
woody?
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
the maintainers of alternatives. Since polipo claims to be in
the spirit of wwwoffle, it might even be possible to provide an
upgrade path.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-04-01 19:28]:
- its open bugs (one RC, but worked on)
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon contains
# bug #295060
remove wwwoffle/2.8e-1
So, yes, because of an RC bug.
Is it not usual practice
add-ons that rely on similar features (auctex runs its configure
script from the maintainer script). And in this case I think it would
be a serious bug in that other package.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:00:19PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Is it not usual practice to send a note about this to the bug? I think
this would be a good idea, both for documentation purposes, and to wake
up lazy maintainers.
No, maintainers have
. Is there any way to teach uscan about this?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Niv Altivanik (Debian) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does ([0-9].[0-9])([0-9]?) help ?
i noticed having 2 pairs of () added a . in the Debian version.
Thank you, that does it fine.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:53:43AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
thanks to the thread about watchfiles for sourceforge projects I now
have a working watch file for jabref which I intend to package.
However, they used version numbers that lacked
Hi,
when a maintainer script creates and possibly edits configuration files
(of course not conffiles), what is the best way to set proper
permissions (e.g. change ownership to a daemon user created by the
package), while still preserving local admin's changes?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
a new dupload.conf.
Has anyone else had this problem? I can't find anything about it using
google. And I'd like to get some bug fixes uploaded before the freeze.
I use dput, and I didn't have any problems. Furthermore, you can use
the DELAYED-0 queue on gluck.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
think all this discussion about etch should be delayed until sarge is
out. Of course we would need a statement from the Nybbles team that
they do not intend to make decicions, and not to settle facts before a
thorough discussion has taken place - after the release.
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f
, or alternatively a hell of patches.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
taken from texlive packages. It would be hard
(and hardly sensible) to try the other way round, texlive basic packages
with, say, tetex-extra.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
of any efforts, or even whether that would be
realistic. Just a principle thought.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
, if you
cannot get agreement with the apt maintainers soon.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
a complete binary distribution is able to rm -rf
the doc directory.
Would there be any objections to filing minor/wishlist bugs against these
packages?
We'll just add wontfix tags, so you might as well not bother to file the
bugs against the texlive packages.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank
install a TeX system because something needs it - but because
they want to right texts.
Only in the special case of software documentation does it happen that
the documentation is completely written, and the user (developer or
buildd) just needs the runtime.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, 08 May 2009 11:59:27 +0200
Frank Küster fr...@debian.org wrote:
Frank Lin PIAT fp...@klabs.be wrote:
The development documentation for libraries and programming languages
should not be installed by the runtime.
This probably means
texlive-base Depend on it, instead of every doc
package (which Depend's on texlive-base anyway) Depend'ing on it.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
?
Emdebian Grip drops Recommends
No problem to lower tl-base's dependency on tl-base-doc to
Recommends. But still, what's the problem with downloading and
installing a package with
Installed-Size: 1216
?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC
.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
,
and look up which in the developer's reference.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
? What should we do?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
when the missing
command is not available.
?
It could be easily solved by making sure that nothing on the buildd
installs packages without installing their dependencies.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV
- that should already be guaranteed by dpkg, or am I missing
something? If it isn't on that machine, what kind of patch should I
write?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
explaining why.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de wrote:
On 2009-06-04, Frank Küster fr...@debian.org wrote:
And what would be the criterion for solved? After an analysis of
N build logs of random packages on that buildd show no segfaults any
more? I am not going to do that.
It's not a bug in my package; I
Frank Küster fr...@debian.org wrote:
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Fine, though taking the trouble to talk to the porters might still be
worthwile.
Yes, but definitely not after I've spend hours of my little Debian
^time
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Fine, though taking the trouble to talk to the porters might still be
worthwile.
Yes, but definitely not after I've spend hours of my little Debian
arguing about non-bugs with people who don't read
being installed, or even unpacked, is NOT A BUG OF
tex-common.
It seems it is a bug of policy, or dpkg.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
# dpkg --unpack a
# dpkg --purge a
can be done without b present. And you do not need any --force option.
Yes, I see.
We'll have to make an upload of texlive-2007.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Norbert Preining wrote:
On Do, 04 Jun 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Except for arguing, mixing (non?) bugs and resisting to upload an easy
workaround might have made things worse btw...
And that easy
:
people).
When adding a new patch, empty fields remind you to write *something*
instead of just dropping the diff into debian/patches...
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
cdbs-simple-patchsys.
Why should he need to do that? If you'd had written submit patches to
dpkg, I could get a meaning out of it, but here? He doesn't want to
diverge from upstream.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90
but
RC (and translation) fixes.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Debian Developer (TeXLive)
VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg
B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add this to afnix:
Conflicts: aleph
Replaces: aleph
This should make it possible to have always one of them installed and
make afnix replace aleph on dist-upgrades.
Isn't
Provides: aleph
also needed?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single
- but I think it's beyond doubt that we will not intentionally
drop support for things like Maple. Or even Mathematica, which
approximately 20 years of development ahead of Maple ;-)
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
?
d-d-a, and it's already there.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/04/msg6.html
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear fellow developers,
the Debian TeX Task force is currently preparing an upload of TeX Live
2007 to unstable. With this version, teTeX will vanish as a separate
package and only continue to exist as transitional packages.
I must apologize
?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 10:11:18AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently preparing an NMU for a package which, besides an RC bug,
also has a bug in its last version number. The upstream version is
4.22, but after 4.22-2 the maintainer uploaded
.. is considered higher than 4.22.3. I'm not sure
if this is good advice though :-)
I know --compare-versions, but I wasn't patient enough to come to
4.22.. But it 4.22..-3.1 doesn't look too bad to me actually, just
funny.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding
if first is larger'
which gives the nice output
$ apt-compare.py
false if second is larger
false if first is larger
$
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
anyway should a 4.22.x version
be released.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
tex4ht which we do not think should be integrated
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
OHURA Makoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Frank and all.
# I'm reading debian-tex-maint.
From: Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ITH] xmltex, passivetex, offer to take over jadetex
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:46:15 +0200
We offer to do the same with jadetex, if Ohura thinks
.
For those who don't routinely decipher DVDs, can you enlighten me? Did
they include a master key in all DVDs which is just a number? Pointers
to a press release are welcome, google only gives results similar to
this ITP...
Fr'wants to laugh too'ank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule
symlinks from /usr/share/ to /etc.
The problem is specifically with symlinks from /etc to some other place
in /etc, and is caused by the fact that debhelper does not mark symlinks
in /etc as conffiles. Has this aspect been discussed with the debhelper
maintainer?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
, other reasons like unrelated errors during dist-upgrade might
also cause version mixes, but again the sane thing to do would be to
run dist-upgrade again, and not try to use the packages or report a
bug...
Comments?
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
use pending to indicate fix found, tested, committed to the
repository. This means there's no need for anyone to work on it.
Whether the upload should be done ASAP or in the next couple of weeks
depends on the severity of the bug.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy
them in the clean target, and
therefore I think the orig.tar.gz should *not* be touched because of
this.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
in the development
branch).
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Marcus Better [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
The VCS can handle the changesets. Putting patches under VCS is silly!
I don't agree. With patches in debian/patches, you can give names to
those files.
With a VCS you can also name branches, or changesets (stgit).
Personally
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
like shrink-wrap licenses, but if you rent a
car or buy a refrigerator, it's common.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Francesco P. Lovergine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Yes, you simply submit a bug report with a patch, and wait for a couple
of year for it to be applied.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkgdata
/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/106537/
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
was ever meant to be taken as admins
have an inalienable right to screw up a package's installation, and packages
must not try to correct for this, which seems to be the case you're
describing.
That way to look at it makes me feel much better...
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
To me, the solution is to resurrect these conffiles without
prompting, because prompting doesn't make sense if the only working
daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---End Message---
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
501 - 600 of 978 matches
Mail list logo
