Re: Uploading amd64 packages

2005-11-18 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 03:09:03PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: Quoting Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Jérôme Marant schrieb: Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master? No. If not, is there any upload queue dedicated at them? Nope. So, I guess I have no choice

Debian Nag NMU in delayed queue

2005-11-20 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
haven't disappeared. Best Regards, -- Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: My IP address seems listed as a spammer address by bugs.debian.org

2005-11-21 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:35:01AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Brian M. Carlson wrote: Additionally, the robots.txt is being violated by bts cache, so perhaps someone should file a bug. bts cache is not a web spider, it only downloads the bugs that you tell it to. It violates the robots.txt

Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?

2005-11-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 12:42:42PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 02:18:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: My understanding was that there aren't other hash functions that've had remotely similar levels of cryptographic analysis to md5 and sha. IIRC, the elliptic

Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?

2005-11-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 03:32:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: Knapsack cryptograph's provably secure (in that a general solution is NP), You mean NP-_complete_. (Sorting is also NP, but not NP-complete. NP is can be done in polynomial time by a non-deterministic Turing machine, so anything

Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?

2005-11-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 10:59:57AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Anthony Towns: On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 07:59:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Anthony Towns: Moving away from MD5 is certainly not a bad idea, but it's not clear whether the alternatives are any better. Sure, everyone

Re: Trying to reach consensus - Yet Another Alternate Proposal to Declassification of debian-private

2005-12-07 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:39:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: I'll try to move forward in the direction of a more consensual proposal about the declassification. So, my conclusion is that it would be nice to have two types of

Re: master mail problems -- help needed

2005-12-08 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:30:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: The fact that my primary MX is only available through IPv6, and that this is the case for other people who're having problems too might then be a better chance at being the problem. My primary MX is IPv6-only, too. I don't have

Re: master mail problems -- help needed

2005-12-08 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:33:54PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Lionel Elie Mamane: On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:30:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: The fact that my primary MX is only available through IPv6, and that this is the case for other people who're having problems too might

Re: master mail problems -- help needed

2005-12-08 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:57:58PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Lionel Elie Mamane: You also have one IPv4-only MX, No, I don't. But Exim 4 thinks so: [EMAIL PROTECTED] router = dnslookup, transport = remote_smtp host capsaicin.mamane.lu [2001:888:19f0::2] MX=9

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-13 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:03:57AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: * Joey Hess [Mon, Dec 12 2005, 03:53:02PM]: This kind of disconnect between what an installed Debian system actually does, what some developers think it does, and results like Debian developers passing out Ubuntu CDs instead of

Re: Debian and the desktop

2005-12-13 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:28:28AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Christian Perrier wrote: And, anyway, the KDE/Gnome thing is only one of the points I meant about the usability of our default desktop system, when we target our dear Bob User. This is beyond tasksel, but Bob User would

Re: Packaging swftools for Debian

2005-12-16 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:24:25AM +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote: I was wondering, if anybody has been working on getting swftools (http://www.swftools.org/) into Debian? Apparently, not recently. There seems to be an old RFP http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=187275 which has

Re: Packaging swftools for Debian

2005-12-17 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:36:38AM +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote: On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 08:56:29AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:24:25AM +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote: Are there any obvious reasons why swftools can't/shouldn't be packaged for Debian? Nobody has done

master mail problems: A temporary workaround

2005-12-18 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:41:55AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:33:54PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: * Lionel Elie Mamane: On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:30:52PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: The fact that my primary MX is only available through IPv6

Re: switching to vim-tiny for standard vi?

2005-12-21 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 04:56:35PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: While I'm a addicted vim user, the build-dependencies of vim(-tiny) is a bit scary for a base package. While we do not have requirements of base packages of being easily buildable, changing to vim-tiny will make bootstrapping a

Re: not getting CCs from the bugs I reported

2005-12-29 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 11:49:31PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: I might be acting paranoid here but just want to clarify couple of things. I was under the impression that, if I report a bug to bugs.debian.org, any future correspondence on that

Re: Thoughts on Debian quality, including automated testing

2005-12-29 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 03:46:08PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: ke, 2005-12-28 kello 02:00 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff kirjoitti: Why don't we add a status field into the PTS, where a maintainer can denote her NMU policy for a given source package? E.g. a selection box, ranging from Don't dare

svn problem: Can you help me?

2006-01-29 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Hi, I've got a problem with subversion, I wonder if you could help me: I tried: [EMAIL PROTECTED] svn mv 'svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/pkg-mailman/tags/2.1.5-10/' svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/pkg-mailman/tags/2.1.5-10/debian svn: Cannot move URL 'svn+ssh://[EMAIL

Re: svn problem: Can you help me?

2006-01-29 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 11:44:32PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: Am Sonntag, den 29.01.2006, 22:11 +0100 schrieb Lionel Elie Mamane: What does that mean and how do I get out of this dead-end? Thanks in advance. Does this one help? http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2003-07/0133.shtml Yes

MIA? Fabio Rafael da Rosa

2006-01-30 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
, 2005 at 11:29:09PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote to Fabio Rafael da Rosa: Please get in touch, whether you want to continue working on Debian or not. If you are just temporarily too busy for Debian, would you mind my taking care of nag and mnemo in the meantime? On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:38

Re: MIA? Fabio Rafael da Rosa

2006-01-31 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:23:28PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Otavio, you seem to have been his sponsor, do you have any news from him in the last 6 months (or since January, 1st 2005, for that matter)? Anybody else? I didn't have any news

Re: MIA? Fabio Rafael da Rosa

2006-01-31 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:50:44PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote: [Lionel Elie Mamane] The remaining question is the equivs package, which is NMU-maintained these days. I suppose that the qa group should take it after a week or two? If you think it should be orphaned / hijacked, I'm willing

timezone data packaged separately and in volatile?

2006-02-02 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
? -- Lionel Elie Mamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: timezone data packaged separately and in volatile?

2006-02-10 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:42:25PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:30:01 +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:42:31PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: I just realised that the timezone data in glibc is taken from an upstream database (namely ftp

Re: Honesty in Debian (was Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract

2006-02-12 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:53:39PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote: On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:46:14PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: The reason I would do this is the same reason I often get so vocal and sometimes angry about these matters: the issue of honesty. I feel that the current situation

Re: Bug#352535: ITP: gitmail -- Very simple graphical mail user agent for sending mail (GTK)

2006-02-14 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:58:24PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:39:25 -0200]: Sure. People looking for git (see package git) and git (see package git-core) will have yet another false positive: an [IMHO!] useless app that duplicates

Re: Ubuntu patches

2006-02-21 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
You probably missed this question, which I also wanted to ask: On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 03:55:23PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And the reason 4.23 isn't in the morgue is simple, Debian's morgue ran out of disk space a while ago. What is Debian's

Re: timezone data packaged separately and in volatile?

2006-02-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:42:25PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: At Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:30:01 +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:42:31PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: I just realised that the timezone data in glibc is taken from an upstream database (namely ftp

Re: versioned symbols in shared libraries (upstream != Debian)

2006-03-13 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:25:21AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote: During the last month I have build my libmysqlclient15 with shared symbols that looked in objdump -T like: 0013a154 gDO .bss 0004 MYSQL_5.0 my_dont_interrupt 00026d70 gDF .text 02fa MYSQL_5.0

Re: Bug#358003: ITP: ttf-dzongkha -- TrueType fonts for Dzongkha language

2006-03-23 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 07:08:02AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Drew Parsons ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): This package includes fonts that are suitable for the display of the Dzongkha language. May I suggest for rare languages like this that you also mention in the description where

Bug#195481: fragmented location info: hassle for users especially mobile ones

2003-05-30 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 03:35:05PM -0600, Barak Pearlmutter wrote: In other words, when I move my laptop I should be able to put in the new lat/long and, assuming everything else is set up to default, all these other things should be filled in with their most probably values. Eg the nearest

Bug#195481: fragmented location info: hassle for users especially mobile ones

2003-06-02 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 08:29:03AM -0600, Barak Pearlmutter wrote: Well okay, granted ... but the locale would almost always be explicitly set, and wouldn't change when eg the lat/long are modified. I disagree on that particular point. If someone installs a Debian, and the install programs

Re: is xprint still used by mozilla, etc?

2005-03-11 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:18:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Like I said at the head of this thread I explicitly added xprt-xprintorg to the deaktop task on user request. However, nothing I've seen so far seems to be a solid reason to keep it. OTOH, if the high priority debconf question goes

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

2005-03-14 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 08:45:09PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Therefore, we're planning on not releasing most of the minor architectures starting with etch. Architectures that are no longer being considered for stable releases are not going to be left out in the cold. The SCC

Re: Not every package should enter Debian (was: Re: Who cares about NEW when there are bigger issues? (was Re: Is NEW processing on hold? (was: Question for candidate Towns)))

2005-03-14 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:15:54AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That being said, sources which just sprout new binary packages really should be passed through NEW automagically. I made a foolish mistake not too long ago that would never have

Re: What does 3 mean? 2.4.20-3-k7

2003-09-25 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Please use debian-user@lists.debian.org for that kind of questions. On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:22:00PM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote: 2.4.20 is the Linux kernel version. k7 means optimise for Athlon. What does 3 mean? It is the fourth binary-incompatible (as far as modules are concerned, not

Re: killing virus e-mails with file types

2003-09-25 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:20:22PM -0500, Craig P. Steffen wrote: I assume .scr is an extension for windows scripts? Nah, it is an extension meant for SCReen-savers. Technically, they are just renamed .exe's, but many people that do know that executable attachments are dangerous don't know that

Re: Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 3.0r2 (II)

2003-11-11 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:59:24AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: I'm confused. On the one hand, you say: The regulations for stable are quite conservative. The requirements for packages to get into stable are: 1. The package fixes a security problem. An advisory by our own Security

Upload getting lost

2006-04-11 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Hi, I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance. I'm uploading the exact packages at http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/mailman/ with dput to the anonymous queue on ftp-master. The upload goes well, I see them if I ftp

Re: Upload getting lost

2006-04-12 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:21AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 10622 March 1977, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance. The problem is the : in your .changes name. The match

Re: Accepted mailman 2.1.5-8sarge3 (source sparc)

2006-04-13 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:54:07PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: * Lionel Elie Mamane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060412 13:49]: mailman (2.1.5-8sarge3) stable; urgency=high . * Don't delete other package's ucf-managed configuration files (closes: #358575) Files

Re: Upload getting lost

2006-04-15 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:36:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:21AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: The problem is the : in your .changes name. The match is: re_taint_free = re.compile(r^[-+~/\.\w]+$); You probably

Re: Upload getting lost

2006-04-15 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:54:27PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As other people have pointed out later in the thread, my point was that I was _not_ having an epoch with dots in it; my version string was 0:1.2.7:1.2.8-1, which is explicitly

Bug#365501: ITP: xchat-guile -- Guile scripting plugin for XChat

2006-04-30 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: xchat-guile Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Zeeshan Ali Khattak [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://piipiip.net/~zeenix/xchat-guile/ * License : GPLv2 or later

Re: Compiling packages for the standard distribution with -Os instead of -O2

2006-05-05 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 03:54:57AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Joe Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Wait a second. Optimizing for size should decrease speed. That is the whole idea of size/speed optimization tradeoffs. A lot of the time the reduced ram requirement can stop swapping

Re: bits from the release team

2006-05-05 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:07:45PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Having the key in the debian-keyring package was a nice idea but ultimatly useless. Sarge users can't fetch the new etch keyring package because the signature doesn't match and the signature doesn't match

Re: patching a package?

2006-05-09 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:32:38PM -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote: Sorry, I'm new to the dpkg system. I looking around on the web site and couldn't seem to find good docs on this specific issue. Appologies if I missed it. I want to take a Debian source package and make a few changes to do it

Re: bacula_1.38.8-0.1_i386.changes is NEW

2006-05-10 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:23:03AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 01:36:47PM +0200, José Luis Tallón wrote: Ok. I don't like flamewars either. There are plenty on Debian-Devel. * Your clean target was ineffective and caused a huge diff.gz For 1.38 ? Yes. Can't clean

Re: gcc 4.1 or not

2006-05-11 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:15:21AM +0200, Martin Wuertele wrote: * Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-10 23:11]: there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. I'm in favour of gcc 4.1 as it would provide our

Re: PDF files and dh_compress

2006-05-11 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 02:21:37AM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: I am strongly against compressing PDFs To add insult to injury, PDF 1.5 introduces ``object streams'' which allow compressing arbitrarily long chunks of a PDF file without giving up the random-access properties of PDF. All

Re: Mass bug filing: failure to use invoke-rc.d when required

2006-05-17 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:53:39AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: ti, 2006-05-16 kello 09:53 +0200, Bas Zoetekouw kirjoitti: Lars wrote: The usage is mendantory (aka a must clause) but the bugs are not RC? This does not fit. It violates policy, but not in a way enumerated on

Re: Why not making /sbin/sendmail a mantadory component for mail operation?

2006-05-17 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:42:42AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: An open outgoing port 25 is commonly blocked by default anywhere you have non-incompetent network management, unless you are on the business of selling full internet uplinks for server hosting, or you do business

Re: sending debian-private postings to gmail

2006-05-25 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 04:09:07PM -0400, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: (2) all mail passing through debian-private should, for each subscriber to the list, be encrypted individually to the public key on file for her/him. Come to think of it, (2) isn't a bad idea. Is it feasible for this to be

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

2006-05-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 04:54:19PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:45:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: On Thursday 25 May 2006 15:26, Mike Hommey wrote: I'm pretty sure we can find official IDs that look so lame that you'd think it's a fake Also worth

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

2006-05-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 12:33:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: Within the Schengen area (European Union plus Norway, Vatican, and... any others?), you travel between countries without even waving your passport at anybody. Yes, but that's because the Schengen area is one area in this. You still

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

2006-05-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 04:07:22PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: The obvious example is the UK, which insists on checking your passport if you come from the mainland. The www.britishembassy.gov.uk website suggests EEA nationals need only an ID card. -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Please revoke your signatures from MartinKraff's keys

2006-05-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:03:27PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: On Friday 26 May 2006 13:40, Joe Smith wrote: Apparently the US makes it very clear that US Citizens are not to be pestered at customs OR ELSE. If only that were true. The Americans give me hell. Joe probably meant pestered by

Re: Please revoke your signatures from MartinKraff's keys

2006-05-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane stated: On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:03:27PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: On Friday 26 May 2006 13:40, Joe Smith wrote: Apparently the US makes it very clear that US Citizens

Re: Please revoke your signatures from MartinKraff's keys

2006-05-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 05:19:21PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane spake thusly: On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane stated: The US constitution applies only to USA citizens, right? Wrong

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

2006-05-29 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 11:40:46PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: (...) they *have* to provide you with a passport. Not because it is a requirement, but because you have the *right* to travel abroad (at least it is in Spain) That's a human right, as defined by the Universal

Re: greylisting on debian.org?

2006-07-11 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 06:28:40PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: This one time, at band camp, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh said: On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Adrian von Bidder wrote: As I know it, the receiving MX connects the regular MX for the sender address to see if *that* is ready to receive mail.

Re: greylisting on debian.org?

2006-07-11 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 08:48:43PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 08:56:52AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 06:28:40PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: This one time, at band camp, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh said: On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Adrian von

Re: The correct use of debian-devel

2006-07-12 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 05:51:17PM +0200, Cesare Leonardi wrote: In particular, the primary question is: Who can write on debian-devel? Anyone: - interested - that has constructive things to say, on-topic, that is the technical development of Debian. - that does so in a socially

Re: greylisting on debian.org?

2006-07-17 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 08:36:31AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Wolfgang Lonien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Do we use greylisting on the @debian.org domain and especially on @lists.debian.org? So, up to now, we've found Thomas Bushnell who seems really hardly voting against greylisting

Re: greylisting on debian.org?

2006-07-18 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:48:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Le lun 17 juillet 2006 22:29, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit : Here is one: I am strongly opposed to greylisting (on mail sent to me or that I send), for the reason that it delays legitimate mail. which shows that you didn't read

Re: greylisting on debian.org?

2006-07-18 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 12:47:49AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le lundi 17 juillet 2006 à 22:29 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit : On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 08:36:31AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Wolfgang Lonien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Do we use greylisting on the @debian.org

Measuring should I greylist? false positive rate [was: greylisting on debian.org?]

2006-07-18 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:48:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Le lun 17 juillet 2006 22:29, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit : the discussion (...) was about enabling greylisting on *certain* *specificaly* *suspicious* hosts. a suspicious host is: * either listed on some RBL's (rbl listing

Re: Measuring should I greylist? false positive rate [was: greylisting on debian.org?]

2006-07-18 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 10:03:59AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Le mar 18 juillet 2006 10:00, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit : On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:48:21PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: Le lun 17 juillet 2006 22:29, Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit : the discussion (...) was about enabling

Re: greylisting on debian.org?

2006-07-18 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 10:22:41AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit : Bingo: Legitimate mail slowed down. You think the price is worth it, which is a valid opinion. I happen not to think so. The question becomes: aren't you in a small minority? That may very well

Re: adding software packet CSpace (a linux p2p instant messenger) to debian..

2006-08-08 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:39:13PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi I want to suggest to add the new linux version of the p2p Instant Messenger http://cspace.in to Debian. See http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ on how to file a Request For Package. -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#382128: RFH: mailman

2006-08-09 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
to be caring for the package at least somewhat.) Get yourself an account on Alioth, I'll add you to the pkg-mailman project and sponsor your uploads if you are not a DD. Contact me with any question / proposition. Thank you in advance and best regards, -- Lionel Elie Mamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Usability: Technical details in package descriptions?

2005-07-23 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:30:24AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:33:32 -0300, Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 2. Programs written in obscure languages may prove unmaintainable if the original developer disappears. Besides threatening obsolescence, this

Re: fresh blood gets congested: long way to become DD

2005-08-01 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 08:24:30PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 11:35 -0500, Adam Heath wrote: On Mon, 1 Aug 2005, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: Hi Nikita, (Are you a girl maybe?) What does that have to do with anything? Stop being male-chauvanistic. Nothing. It

Re: building own package

2005-08-03 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
(You may - or may not - have more luck on [EMAIL PROTECTED] for that kind of questions.) On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote: * I store all the scripts in a tarball, Do you mean the .orig.tar.gz or do you mean a tarball in the unpacked Debian sources (the result of

Re: Debian Installation process

2005-08-03 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
(debian-user@lists.debian.org looks more appropriate. Please send followups there _and_ to me. debian-devel is for development issues and debian-user-french for user support issues in French.) On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Jean-Matthieu Buton wrote: We have just bought a brand

Re: building own package

2005-08-03 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 04:42:33PM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote: Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote: * I store all the scripts in a tarball, If you are using the .orig.tar.gz directly, you have misunderstood the structure of a Debian source

Re: Debian Installation process

2005-08-03 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:23:14AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 02:18:01PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez le ici ! Non merci, je ne suis pas intéressé. Par contre, Debian est

Re: It is 23:53, do you know whether your package (un)installs cleanly?

2005-09-04 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 11:19:35AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: su, 2005-09-04 kello 16:25 +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson kirjoitti: On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:53:35PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Reading piuparts logs en masse is tedious and I would be extremely happy if all developers did it for

Re: Debian OpenSolaris port, exchange with Sun folks in webforum/MailingList

2005-09-07 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 01:35:54AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems the only oposition to this thus far is the choice of venue clause, There's a far more serious problem, which has nothing to do with the DFSG - the FSF's interpretation of the GPL

Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...

2005-09-08 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 04:58:32PM +0200, Yorick Cool wrote: On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 03:55:56PM +0200, Dalibor Topic wrote: The application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods is expressly excluded. That's my favourite bit of lawyerese in

Re: Developer support

2005-09-13 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:21:21AM -0400, Shawn (Shu Xiang) Yu wrote: Where can I find a company that provide better developer support on Debian. We are trying to find a company and pay fees to get support if we have problem during develop code under the Linux. We need them to provide the

Re: SSL Root Ceritficate

2005-09-14 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:43:19PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: as nm.debian.org is now using https i would like to know, where i could find the public part of the SSL root certificate of spi-inc.org online. http://www.spi-inc.org/secretary/ -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?

2005-09-21 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:41:10AM +0200, Marc Chantreux wrote: zsh provides some things i've never seen in bash, for example : - file globbing flags, so you can set case insensitivity, That's a thing bash has: shopt -s nocaseglob. For the rest... -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: localhost.localdomain

2005-10-07 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 03:25:15PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote: On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:31:37AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: When proposing a variation from long-standing historical practice, shouldn't the onus be on the on making the change? What problem does 'localhost.localdomain' solve?

Re: gnome-1 transition

2005-10-07 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:00:44PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: On Thu, Oct 06, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: A few weeks ago, libpng10-0 was removed from the archive. A consequence of this was that all gnome-1 packages (and there are a number still around) instantly became FTBFS.

Re: [Fwd: Re: Debian based GNU/Solaris: pilot program]

2005-11-02 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 09:27:04PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Native GNU libc do not make any difference since it is a part of system runtime which includes: kernel, libc, compiler, etc (as per GPL). You use these quotation marks in the most

Re: Transition time: KDE, JACK, arts, sablotron, unixodbc, net-snmp, php, ...

2005-11-03 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 04:20:45AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Second, thanks to some enhancements Ryan Murray has recently made to buildd/wanna-build, it is now possible for the release team to request automated buildd binNMUs of a package across all architectures for library transitions,

Re: Debian based GNU/Solaris: pilot program

2005-11-04 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:27:38PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The CDDL (based as it is on the MPL) allows you to mix CDDL-licensed files in a project with files under CDDL-incompatible licenses and distribute the resulting executable. Sorry, I didn't

KJV Bible - Crown Copyright in UK [was: Bug#338077: ITP: sword-text-kvj -- King James Version with Strongs Numbers and Morphology]

2005-11-08 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
( Please mail followups to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-legal@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:13:42AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Quoting Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 08:51:26PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez

testing migration: wtf?

2005-11-11 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
What is happening with testing migration of my package, sork-passwd? The various testing migration pages seem to be all confused: - http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?package=sork-passwd doesn't give me the excuses link anymore - http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=sork-passwd

Re: testing migration: wtf?

2005-11-12 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 04:30:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:58:35PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: What is happening with testing migration of my package, sork-passwd? The various testing migration pages seem to be all confused: - http://qa.debian.org

Re: Alternative: Source-Centric Approach [w/code]

2005-04-07 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:25:23AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: I'm throwing out a different idea, I propose that we split things along these lines: binary+source (B+S) archs and source-only (SO) archs. SO archs will be handled exactly like we do now, EXCEPT that we will not distribute .debs

Re: Cartouches d'encre de la marque de votre imprimante (conseil important)

2005-04-16 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:19:12AM +0200, Ghislain Roggemans wrote: J'ai des listes de prix pour des milliers de cartouche que je vends avec des marges très faibles, je me propose donc de vous fournir vos cartouches et toners aux meilleurs prix du marché. Wohoo! And a 1999,- USD donation for

Bug#305067: ITP: scsh-install-lib -- scsh package installer

2005-04-17 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Package name: scsh-install-lib Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Michel Schinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : GPLv2 or later Description : scsh

Re: packages missing from sarge

2005-05-11 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 09:03:19PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: polyxmass-doc That's the documentation for binaries that _are_ in sid; it was a few days late for sarge. I find this to be quite sucky, that Debian ships the program, but not the documentation. (Let's note that I'm not the maintainer,

Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies

2005-06-26 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:43:28PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: 1) foo and foo-data. There is usualy no reason for foo-data to depend on foo. foo-data does not provide user-visible interface, only data, so it does not need to depend on foo. However, we have some users randomly filing bugs on

Package priorities: optional vs extra

2005-06-26 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
I recently found some packages in at an IMHO totally wrong priority in Debian. Before taking action, I'd like to arrive at a rough consensus here. I also found some less clear-cut cases, so this prompted me to think a bit about the language in the policy and what it means. The more I think about

Re: Alioth Project Approved - and now?

2005-06-27 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:51:07AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:20:50 + From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^^ H, this sound not good for the sake of further communication. Why not including a mail address which can be

Re: OT: No unsubscribe signature?

2005-06-28 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:18:16AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:14:33AM -0400, Josh Metzler wrote: without the usual signature describing how to unsubscribe from debian-devel. Was this the case for everyone, or is there something between the debian servers and my

  1   2   3   4   >