-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
libg15render-dev - Library for interfacing with the Logitech G15 keyboards
libg15render1 - Library for interfacing with the Logitech G15 keyboards
Closes: 620567
Changes:
libg15render (1.3.0~svn316-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non-maintainer
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
libfox-1.6-0 - The FOX C++ GUI Toolkit
libfox-1.6-dev - Development files for the FOX C++ GUI Toolkit
libfox-1.6-doc - Documentation of the FOX C++ GUI Toolkit
Closes: 620591
Changes:
fox1.6 (1.6.44-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non
-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
amanda-client - Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk Archiver (Client)
amanda-common - Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk Archiver (Libs)
amanda-server - Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk Archiver (Server)
Closes: 621214
Changes:
amanda (1
-dev libceph1 libceph1-dbg
libceph-dev radosgw radosgw-dbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.27-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) g...@debian.hu
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
ceph - distributed storage and file system
ceph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:58:55 +0200
Source: libast
Binary: libast2 libast2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l
-glue cluster-glue-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.0.7-3.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian HA Maintainers
debian-ha-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
cluster-glue - The reusable cluster components for Linux HA
-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
libdiagnostics-dev - Logging, unittesting, and runtime diagnostics for C++ -
developme
libdiagnostics0 - Logging, unittesting, and runtime diagnostics for C++ -
library
Closes: 621225
Changes:
diagnostics (0.3.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Non
-kde-ext...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
exiv2 - EXIF/IPTC metadata manipulation tool
libexiv2-9 - EXIF/IPTC metadata manipulation library
libexiv2-dbg - EXIF/IPTC metadata manipulation library - debug
libexiv2-dev - EXIF/IPTC metadata
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:44:24 +0200
Source: libidl
Binary: libidl0 libidl-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.14-0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sebastian Rittau srit...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l
...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
liborbit2 - libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
liborbit2-dev - development files for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
orbit2 - a CORBA ORB
orbit2-nameserver - a CORBA name server
Closes: 619205
Changes:
orbit2 (1:2.14.18-0.2) unstable; urgency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 23:04:40 +0200
Source: gpgme1.0
Binary: libgpgme11-dev libgpgme11
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.0-1.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo js...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 08:28:55 +0200
Source: encfs
Binary: encfs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.7.4-2.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eduard Bloch bl...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description
On 05/29/2011 05:02 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Currently there are still some outstanding issues before we can really
start using multiarch. You can find the status at the wiki page [1].
It seems that the main blocker at the moment is bug #618288 in apt
On 05/29/2011 05:31 PM, Michael Meskes wrote:
I received an auto-reject because of a lintian error message that, as my
system
says, is correctly overridden. Could anyone please tell me which lintian
version we use to determine auto-rejection and also which lintian version
we're
supposed to
Hi
Currently there are still some outstanding issues before we can really
start using multiarch. You can find the status at the wiki page [1].
It seems that the main blocker at the moment is bug #618288 in apt.
Please help to fix the outstanding bugs for the build tools (pmake,
On 05/28/2011 03:52 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 05/28/2011 02:48 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
Currently there are still some outstanding issues before we can really
start using multiarch. You can find the status at the wiki page [1].
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Bootstrapping
your
On 05/28/2011 03:32 PM, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 14:48, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
It seems that the main blocker at the moment is bug #618288 in apt.
Fixed in branch for a while, just not yet uploaded. [0]
But it can't be a blocker as dpkg doesn't has full
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 09:10:42 +0200
Source: acl
Binary: acl libacl1-dev libacl1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.49-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Nathan Scott nath...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 15:48:08 +0200
Source: attr
Binary: attr libattr1-dev libattr1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:2.4.44-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Nathan Scott nath...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 17:08:35 +0200
Source: cachefilesd
Binary: cachefilesd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Shane Wegner sh...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Hi
Just to remember people that one can follow the status of the .la file
dependency_libs clearing goal at Andreas' overview page [1].
A package entry followed by nothing more than a colon (:) means that the
package ships an .la file with a cleared dependency_libs field.
A package entry that
On 05/26/2011 11:55 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 26.05.2011 10:46, schrieb Simon McVittie:
On Thu, 26 May 2011 at 08:47:06 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Comments welcome, but foremost I'd like a mass effort to clear the
remaining dependency_libs fields! :-)
Am I right in thinking
On 05/26/2011 06:04 PM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Michael Biebl]
Clearing the dependency_libs is always safe, afaics, so I'd rather say it is
something like
if depended-on
clear dependency_libs
else
remove *.la files
Seems like the following would work instead:
remove
-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
net-tools - The NET-3 networking toolkit
Closes: 569509 625157
Changes:
net-tools (1.60-24) unstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/patches/Add_missing_headers.patch: Fix FTBFS (Closes: #625157).
* debian/patches/Bug#569509-iface_overflow.patch: Fix
On 04/05/2011 11:05 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Carsten Hey wrote:
* Steve Langasek [2011-04-04 19:37 -0700]:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:00:36AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
* Find a sane solution for managing /bin/sh. Currently diversions are
used, which looks like the wrong tool for this
On 04/06/2011 01:55 AM, Carsten Hey wrote:
* Luk Claes [2011-04-05 23:11 +0200]:
On 04/05/2011 11:05 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Carsten Hey wrote:
* Steve Langasek [2011-04-04 19:37 -0700]:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 02:00:36AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
Guaranteeing that /bin/sh exists
Hi
bash is not the default system shell anymore. It's now only the default
user shell. As such it is not required for a sysadmin to boot and
install software. Besides that some users would like to get rid of bash
in their environment which is obviously not easily done atm.
The most obvious
On 04/04/2011 09:32 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On ma, 2011-04-04 at 19:43 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
However, there have got to be hundreds of packages using bash
without a dependency. Do we have any information on the
affected packages (i.e. all those with a #!/bin/bash shebang in any
On 04/04/2011 10:42 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:32:50PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On ma, 2011-04-04 at 19:43 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
Regarding the root shell issue, I wouldn't have an issue with it
being /bin/sh. The admin is always free to chsh it to the shell
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
cifs-utils - Common Internet File System utilities
smbfs - Common Internet File System utilities - compatibility package
Closes: 504690 583508 586009 589218 600788 603094 615211
Changes:
cifs-utils (2:4.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
, including
a description of the goal and an indication of how progress on the
issues may be tracked
(e.g. a pointer to a set of appropriate user-tagged bugs).
# bootperformance
Advocate: Petter Reinholdsen and Luk Claes
State: confirmed
Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals
On 03/28/2011 12:05 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
reassign 619820 dash,bash
block 619820 by 540512
thanks
On Sonntag, 27. März 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
# which packages are essential affects the entire distribution
reassign 619820 general
For the distro we have solved^wdecided this by
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
nfs-common - NFS support files common to client and server
nfs-kernel-server - support for NFS kernel server
Closes: 441361 474037 528939 560388 585085 610363 612933
Changes:
nfs-utils (1:1.2.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:48:34 +0100
Source: insserv
Binary: insserv
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.14.0-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Petter Reinholdtsen p...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 15:57:22 +0100
Source: rpcbind
Binary: rpcbind
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:30:46 +0100
Source: portmap
Binary: portmap
Architecture: source i386
Version: 6.0.0-5
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:41:37 +0100
Source: portmap
Binary: portmap
Architecture: source i386
Version: 6.0.0-4
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l
Changed-By: Luk Claes l...@debian.org
Description:
nfs-common - NFS support files common to client and server
nfs-kernel-server - support for NFS kernel server
Closes: 521084 524610 561718 562737 575503 593511 598493 612002
Changes:
nfs-utils (1:1.2.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Ben Hutchings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:40:09 +0100
Source: portmap
Binary: portmap
Architecture: source i386
Version: 6.0.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:53:51 +0100
Source: rpcbind
Binary: rpcbind
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l
On 02/14/2011 08:39 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 11:33:10 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Since there is no support for auto-building arch-independent binaries
On 02/13/2011 07:00 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On su, 2011-02-13 at 18:49 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
I don;t think that is a good idea, there are way too many people not building
and testing their packages properly already, we don't want to give that work
to
the buildd-admins...
That's
On 01/23/2011 03:06 PM, Magicloud Magiclouds wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to make a custom debian-installer cd. I have done this
before, things worked fine. But this time, I got a problem.
My running kernel installed from
linux-image-2.6.36.3i686_bfs363.reiser4_i386.deb. It contains a naming
On 12/27/2010 01:45 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:19:57 +0100
Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no wrote:
]] Rahul Amaram
| I am the maintainer for calendarserver. I have a query reg. preinst
| script. I need to perform some action during preinst before the
| upgrade of
On 12/26/2010 02:10 PM, Malte Forkel wrote:
Am 25.12.2010 20:18, schrieb Michael Banck:
Why can't this be part of pbuilder itself? Did your patches got
rejected by the pbuilder author and if so, what was his rationale?
Maybe if he thinks they should not be part of pbuilder, they shouldn't
On 11/22/2010 11:11 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2010-11-22, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
The rtupdate script has since been changed (in unstable) to avoid this
problem, but I'm not sure what can be done for stable users other than
On 10/17/2010 04:47 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Luca Falavigna, le Sun 17 Oct 2010 16:41:31 +0200, a écrit :
Julien Danjou a...@debian.org
XCB Developers x...@lists.freedesktop.org
Jamey Sharp sharp...@debian.org
Josh Triplett j...@freedesktop.org
libpthread-stubs0 (U)
That's expected
Hi Raphael
On 09/23/2010 02:30 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
Raphael's article is now published, and is probably a good basis for
discussing CUT on -de...@.
Free link: http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/406301/bd522adc828b3461/
Personally I have the feeling
On 09/26/2010 04:40 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi Luk,
Hi Lucas
Note that this is my personal opinion and does not represent the opinion
of the Release Team perse.
On 26/09/10 at 15:55 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
I think this is completely the wrong question, we'd better ask the
question: Why do
On 09/26/2010 05:02 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Why would non-frequent snapshots help more than frequent snapshots?
Because in that case they could really be used and supported for
installing, better user testing, security
Hi Raphael
On 09/26/2010 08:40 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
Of course there are multiple reasons. Though I think one of the most
obvious ones is that we as a project don't do a genuine stable release
often so sometimes delay the freeze willingly
On 09/23/2010 09:00 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 22/09/10 at 15:01 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi all,
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
CUT discussions at debconf10 and recent news of the birth of Linux Mint
discussions on CUT have continued after debconf on the CUT mailing.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:35:34 +
Source: terminal.app
Binary: terminal.app
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.4+cvs20051125-5.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün gur...@phys.ethz.ch
Changed-By: Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:45:31 +
Source: textedit.app
Binary: textedit.app
Architecture: source i386
Version: 4.0+20061029-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün gur...@linuks.mine.nu
Changed-By: Luk Claes l
Hi
When I go through RC bugs I see more and more bugs which are both found
and fixed with the same version.
This does NOT work: these bugs are treated as if they are not fixed at all.
Please do not version bug closures when there were no changes to the
source package to get the bug fixed!
Note
On 08/15/2010 04:41 PM, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 04:25:19PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
When I go through RC bugs I see more and more bugs which are both found
and fixed with the same version.
This does NOT work: these bugs are treated as if they are not fixed at all.
Why
On 08/15/2010 06:17 PM, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 04:57:40PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
It's very strange that you think it's ok to mark a bug as fixed in a
specific version even if there was nothing changed in the package to get
the bug fixed IMHO.
Well, if, like in your
On 06/28/2010 04:40 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Hi,
As I reported in Bug#587420, all twitter client should support OAuth since
twitter
will discard basic auth. If they not, we should drop them from Squeeze
release.
Will they also not be usable anymore with identi.ca and similar twitter
On 05/30/2010 07:57 PM, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
Am Sun, 30 May 2010 15:02:41 +0100
schrieb Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org:
There are already well understood mechanisms for ensuring that uids
are the same across multiple systems. I don't think adduser is the
place for that.
I guess you should
On 05/26/2010 08:05 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
I'm still feeling uneasy about this whole bash-dash thing. We sacrified
a lot of usability in the name of POSIX compliance (only a minority of
users care) and a few seconds spared during boot (who cares? I only boot
my laptop for kernel
On 05/11/2010 01:09 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:49:46PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:37:56 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 05:25:16PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Is it really a good idea to have init
On 05/08/2010 11:47 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 19:27:54 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
(Beside the nitpick on we want vs we possibly want) I'd argue that
it's because we want a faster boot from our users ASAP.
As far as I'm concerned, faster boot is irrelevant.
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Luk Claes wrote:
Hi Clint
You seem to send the message that you can judge from the sideline how
things should be run, so I hereby invite you to join the Release Team
and do a proper job.
If you don't take the challenge I'll interpret that as you being a
coward who
Hi Clint
You seem to send the message that you can judge from the sideline how
things should be run, so I hereby invite you to join the Release Team
and do a proper job.
If you don't take the challenge I'll interpret that as you being a
coward who does not deserve to be heard in the future.
Marco d'Itri wrote:
Now that /sbin/fsck is provided by util-linux it should be possible to
drop the Essential attribute from the e2fsprogs. How do we do this?
The whole archive needs to be scanned to see if no functionality of
e2fsprogs is used without (build) dependency. Dropping the flag
Norbert Preining wrote:
Dear Luk, dear Jörg, dear ftp-master, dear whoever,
please help me with fixing that problem:
Now I have the following problem:
- sending a dcut rm of the files I get:
Log of processing your commands file
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On 02/02/2010 03:37, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi everyone,
can someone explain me how to track down a lost upload? Yesterday I
uploaded maildir-util 0.6-1 and got the email
Uploaded successfully
but since then nothing has happened, and I don't see it in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:08:13 +
Source: fakechroot
Binary: fakechroot
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.9-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Piotr Roszatycki dex...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luk Claes l
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Please don't forget to usertag the reports. Using the ftbfs-gcc-4.5
usertag should make it easier to track them (which would later make them
show up on
Bastian Venthur wrote:
Hi all,
I'm sorry to bring this topic up again, but what is the status of Python
2.6 and Squeeze? I wrote a mail to doko on 2009-12-13 asking him what
his plans are and if he needs help but didn't receive an answer yet. Has
anyone more information?
python 2.6 will be
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
And it seems to be staying like this.
I'm not sure when this happened, but apt used to be
build-essential=yes but now it's not.
Are you saying that build-essential=yes was still in use?
It also looks
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 23:43:44 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
And it seems to be staying like this.
I'm not sure when this happened, but apt used to be
build-essential=yes but now it's
Luca Falavigna wrote:
Il giorno Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:11:18 +0100
Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org ha scritto:
Here's a follow-up to include some more packages, and to remove those
which were already fixed in the meantime.
--
PACKAGES TO BE REMOVED
Frans Pop wrote:
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2009-12-03 14:11]:
[1] IMO this question is fair since Matthias is listed as sole
maintainer for Python packages.
I agree it's a fair question but you guys should really CC Matthias
since -devel is not a required list.
Joey Hess wrote:
So, Debian is no longer an open project?
sarcasmWhy would having pointless discussions and flames on the lists
and because of that private discussions to get real solutions mean that
Debian is not an open project anymore?/sarcasm
The problems are known and are on the lists, the
Joey Hess wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
The question of whether someone is doing an adequate job of maintaining a
package is a legitimate one. The identity of their employer is immaterial
to an objective examination of this question.
I think this argument only makes sense if the
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 07:45:30PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Unfortunately Debian does not seem to be able to also have real
constructive discussion about complex issues on the lists. So for these
issues we usually have real discussions on IRC, real life, phone
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 03/12/09 at 23:55 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03 2009, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
Right now we're working on updating the Debian Python Policy. Once we'll
be happy with the first set of patches, we'll send them to debian-python
mailing list. I don't see a
Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
I'm the maintainer of pdns-recursor. This program uses swapcontext which is
not available on all platforms.
Recently the mips, mipsel and sparc architecture got support for those calls.
So I sent a mail to arch@buildd.debian.org
for enabling this. But until now I
Hi
gnat-4.4 FTBFS on mipsel which is blocking gcc-defaults from migrating
to testing which is blocking at least the poppler and gnome related
transitions. xulrunner was reuploaded again and needs to be built
everywhere first before we can reconsider forcing it in.
cmake and xulrunner had some
Andreas Marschke wrote:
On Saturday 28 November 2009 09:46:51 Luk Claes wrote:
gnat-4.4 FTBFS on mipsel which is blocking gcc-defaults from migrating
to testing which is blocking at least the poppler and gnome related
transitions. xulrunner was reuploaded again and needs to be built
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 09:46:51AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
gnat-4.4 FTBFS on mipsel which is blocking gcc-defaults from migrating
to testing which is blocking at least the poppler and gnome related
transitions. xulrunner was reuploaded again and needs to be built
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Hi
Hi
I've just met an uninstallable package with 3-week-old RC bug, caused by
soname change of one of dependences. This bug could be fixed by a simple
rebuild - I've checked if package builds against today's sid - yes it
does.
I've never done an NMU
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de writes:
On 2009-11-19, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
This could only work if the built package is needed on the same buildd
it was built.
That depends on the assumptions. If the assumption is that the buildds are
trusted
Andreas Tille wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:41:51AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
I think one would be surprised how many packages get used on 'exotic'
architectures. Most users don't specifically search for a piece of
software, they want to have some specific task done by using a specific
Clint Adams wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:41:51AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
I don't think it's good to waste buildd time on failing to build packages.
I also don't think anyone is stopped from setting up a service that
allows source-only uploads as a go-between.
Do you mean set up
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
First of all, thanks for this great roundup. There are just some few
questions that popped up in my mind that I hope haven't asked yet
(wasn't able to check all the responses completely ...). Sorry if there
are duplications, a reference to the answer for
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:54:18AM +, Philipp Kern a écrit :
there might not be clusters of arm yet but I saw offers for clusters of mips.
Hi Philipp
I also saw this cluster and got quite curious until I realised that most
programs I package are not
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk writes:
On 2009-11-18, Gerfried Fuchs rho...@deb.at wrote:
I am a bit confused with respect to how buildd autosigning is required
for this. It makes it sound somehow like it would affect porter binary
Basicalyl, the turnaround time
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:27:22AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
Unless your proposal is just for unstable but doesn't want to change the
policy for testing migration?
Hi,
Testing migration works the way it should: if a package is never built on an
Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:38:38AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
requiring binary uploads ensures that the package has been build-tested
*somewhere* prior to upload, and avoids clogging up the buildds with
preventable failures (some of which will happen only at the
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Philipp Kern tr...@philkern.de writes:
On 2009-11-16, Simon Huggins hug...@earth.li wrote:
If you throw away the binaries, a DD can upload a binary package with a
sole binary that prints out banana and a source package that builds the
right thing presumably. Are
.
Thanks for looking at the listed issues though.
Le dimanche 08 novembre 2009 à 12:48 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
- anjuta not yet built on all arches
This is a consequence of the subversion FTBFS on said architectures. It
can be given-back once svn is fixed.
Ok, hopefully there will be soon
Michal Čihař wrote:
Hi
Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:39:38 +0100
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org napsal(a):
As a personal note, as one of those unlucky people with a very slow
network connection: if binary packages built by maintainer have to be
discarded, than *please* allow a way to actually
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:39:38AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 08:30, Adam Majer ad...@zombino.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:58:19PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26 2009, Adam Majer wrote:
Or here's a radical idea - allow source
Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:42, Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org wrote:
Hi
Dne Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:39:38 +0100
Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org napsal(a):
As a personal note, as one of those unlucky people with a very slow
network connection: if binary packages built by
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:45:57AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
Personally, I think that the extreme trade-off of making source upload
the default (which seems to be what you are arguing for) would be too
risky in term of degraded package quality. Look for the
Bill Allombert wrote:
13. Remote Network Interaction; Use with the GNU General Public License.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify the
Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting
with it remotely through a computer
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 12:48:11PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
Currently there are 4 rather big transitions going on, none of which is
ready to transition. Following are the things that currently are an
issue or that show why the 4 transitions are coupled:
* xulrunner
Hi
Currently there are 4 rather big transitions going on, none of which is
ready to transition. Following are the things that currently are an
issue or that show why the 4 transitions are coupled:
* xulrunner:
- iceweasel crashes (#552178)?
- freej FTBFS on amd64 (no bug filed yet)
- gdl not
301 - 400 of 1246 matches
Mail list logo
