-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wotcha.
Those who read deban-devel may remember me announcing
http://people.debian.org/~willy/gcc-transition/ about six weeks ago.
That generated a certain amount of interest, and indeed activity.
Which was great, but it's slacked off a bit
badly.
http://people.debian.org/~willy/gcc-transition/
i think technically these are all worthy of an RC bug, but i don't want
to file them and you don't want to see them. if your name's on the list:
http://people.debian.org/~willy/gcc-transition/maint-packages-2.95
then figure out which of
[ As suggested by Policy 10.1 [1], I am forwarding this issue to
debian-devel. Please maintain the cc list in followups. ]
Recent versions of manpages-dev include a new manpage queue.3. dqs has
been providing a manpage by this name for some time. Therefore there
is a file conflict when
Brent Fulgham put efuns up for adoption over a year ago. It's got 3
release critical bugs open against it. I considered adopting it, but
as I don't know CAML and don't like emacs, it would be a bad choice.
Please, could someone who knows CAML adopt this package and look it over?
Otherwise,
I got sick of listening to people discuss the gcc 3.2 transition in an
uninformed manner. So I've whipped up a transition plan which will
hopefully get us from A to B without causing too much pain. Haha.
I'm entirely fallible and I don't pretend to understand all the issues
involved with doing
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 09:59:28AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
* Add a Conflict with the non-`c' version of the package.
why can't we have both installed, just like the libfoo6 and libfoo6g
situation??
i explained this elsewhere...
Why don't we put the libs in a different
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
In Jeff's plan: All C++ packages will be uploaded via NMUs. The
package maintainer can upload their packages afterwards if they have
to make other corrections.
All of them? I sw someone do a count and there were around 1000
From a security point of view, it might be considered worthwhile to install
system executables (particularly the suid ones) and then mark them immutable.
This does stop some common attacks from succeeding, and it might prevent some
stupid things accidentally done as root. My Debian 1.2.10 system
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:20:29PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Anyway, regarding kernels: I can imagine sometimes, especially with the
backlog we have currently, a swift processing of some kernel package
might be warranted and help Sarge. If there is such a case, it would
help if someone
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:08:19PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Thanks. Maybe i should resign from my debian duties then since i am not
wanted. Do you volunteer to take over my packages ? Please handle parted for
which i am searching a co-maintainer since 6 month, and take over the
powerpc
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:10:12PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Matthew Wilcox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050321 17:05]:
I'm not going to volunteer for them as I intend to leave Debian
shortly after sarge releases.
Why do you intend to leave Debian?
The Vancouver meeting summary upset me
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:06:19AM -0300, Humberto Massa wrote:
And I believe that the Vancouver proposal, if implemented as intended up
to now, will not only affect what Debian really *is*, but in some ways
will *destroy* what Debian is.
Debian has already decided to destroy what it is by
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:56:17PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
Same for apache 1.3 (including apache, apache-ssl, apache-perl); it too
will soon disappear from sid and lenny. There are currently only a
handful of apache 1.3 module packages in sid, against which bugs will
be filed, but there
reassign 388805 libapache-mod-auth-radius
retitle 388805 Please build apache 2 version
kthxbye
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:10:04PM +0200, Ond??ej Sur?? wrote:
retitle 388805 RFP: please package mod_auth_xradius
reassign 388805 wnpp
severity 388805 wishlist
thank you
You have filled bug at
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:34:01PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
I wrote:
Normally I wouldn't publish private email but I think in this case the
abusive nature warrants it.
It really doesn't. Wanker.
It has been suggested that it would be better to include the context,
to avoid any potential
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:47:41 -0500
Source: kerneloops
Binary: kerneloops
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:03:23 -0500
Source: kerneloops
Binary: kerneloops
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:03:34 -0400
Source: mencal
Binary: mencal
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:23:22 -0500
Source: libpci2
Binary: libpci2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:2.1.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian pciutils Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox
]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
pciutils - Linux PCI Utilities
pciutils-dev - Linux PCI Utilities (development files)
pciutils-udeb - Linux PCI Utilities (udeb) (udeb)
Closes: 173274 256607 265745 265771 292324 302142 304576 329370 336331 343222
347872 347877 349239
]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
pciutils - Linux PCI Utilities
pciutils-dev - Linux PCI Utilities (development files)
pciutils-udeb - Linux PCI Utilities (udeb) (udeb)
Changes:
pciutils (1:2.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Fix Maintainer email address
Files
PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
pciutils - Linux PCI Utilities
pciutils-dev - Linux PCI Utilities (development files)
pciutils-udeb - Linux PCI Utilities (udeb) (udeb)
Closes: 268031 335665 379407
Changes:
pciutils (1:2.2.4~pre4-1) unstable; urgency=low
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:38:36 -0400
Source: libpci2
Binary: libpci2
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2:2.1.11-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian pciutils Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:07:48 -0400
Source: keyanalyze
Binary: keyanalyze
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.0.200204-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:18:36 -0500
Source: lwm
Binary: lwm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED
Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
db3-doc- Berkeley v3 Database Documentation [html]
libdb3 - Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [runtime]
libdb3++-dev - Berkeley v3 Database Libraries for C++ [development]
libdb3++c102 - Berkeley v3 Database
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 12:33:41 -0500
Source: lwm
Binary: lwm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:34:24 -0500
Source: lwm
Binary: lwm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:43:31 -0500
Source: kerneloops
Binary: kerneloops
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 06:44:14 -0400
Source: kerneloops
Binary: kerneloops
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Matthew Wilcox [EMAIL
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 09:29:30PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
I would like to start by highlighting one very important line from my
last email to you:
> > Do not contact me with regard to Debian bullshit.
And yet, you did. Fuck you. Do not contact me again. I shall consider
any further
I quit Debian development back in 2004. This was a moral decision, based
on the malfeasance of the project secretary over the "Editorial changes"
GR.
For some reason, Debian as a project failed to notice that I had quit,
even though my wi...@debian.org email address was deliberately forwarded
32 matches
Mail list logo
