-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:17:36 +0100
Source: nsca
Binary: nsca
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-common - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-mysql - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-pgsql - A host/service/network monitoring and management
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:00:59 +0100
Source: dbconfig-common
Binary: dbconfig-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-common - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-mysql - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-pgsql - A host/service/network monitoring and management
hi -admin and -devel,
executive summary: mysterious and unreproducible ftbfs for
mysql, and perhaps other packages on the hppa architecture. a faulty
buildd (sarti) is suspected, but afaict all requests for information
remain unanswered.
i'm suspecting hardware problems, as for mysql this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:50:24 +0100
Source: nsca
Binary: nsca
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-common - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-mysql - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-pgsql - A host/service/network monitoring and management
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sean Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(explanation for why there needs to be a nagios2 given after the blurb)
Package name: nagios2
Version : 2.0 (when released)
Upstream Author : Ethan Galstad
URL
Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-common - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-mysql - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-pgsql - A host/service/network monitoring and management
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 09:56:48PM +, Dave Holland wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:30:37AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
I think the default behaviour should be to keep the post private, not to
open it up. That is, if the author and other individuals do not reply,
the message is kept
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:59:40 +0100
Source: cacti
Binary: cacti
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.6g-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:12:03 +0100
Source: dbconfig-common
Binary: dbconfig-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
just throwing a quick $0.02 in here,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:51:30PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Well, being able to read the documentation (including the man page) of a
binary without requiring the binary to be installed is a good thing
IMHO. Especially for big and complex
hi joerg,
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:23:58AM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
I've got a bug report (#336527) my package bootchart-view do not work
with j2re1.3. But j2re1.3 is not in Debian. Can I set a conflict upon a
packages that is not in Debian? But if it do not work with j2re1.3 it
should
hi jay,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 12:27:33PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
From time to time, someone announces an intention to package some tiny
script or program, and people suggest including it in some other
package instead to avoid pollution of the archive with lots of tiny
packages.
hi frank,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 12:25:01PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
we just received a bug report that is caused by a buggy prerm script
in the package in sarge (it fails because it doesn't handle read-only
/usr/local properly). Is there any way to fix this, except documenting
it in the
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 03:43:36PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
You could send them e.g. a DMCA Takedown Notice. Especially as they
didn't listen before. Of course only if you're the author of one of the
relevant programms.
you could also send their isp(s) and/or hosting provider(s) said
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:17:40 +0100
Source: dbconfig-common
Binary: dbconfig-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
hi,
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:16:43PM -0500, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
Within the security team, there has recently been some talk of pushing
for per-user temp directories by default in etch. I'd like to see what
people's reaction to such a proposal would be.
granted that i don't know the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 09:53:17 +0100
Source: cacti-cactid
Binary: cacti-cactid
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.6f-1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-common - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-mysql - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-pgsql - A host/service/network monitoring and management
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:24:37 +0100
Source: cacti-cactid
Binary: cacti-cactid
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.6f-1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
hi javier,
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:03:01PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
I would like developers to review and provide feedback for that section,
thanks for actually putting this into a document, however, i notice
two problems:
- the addgroup/adduser functions mask the error
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:56:44PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
the simple fact that a postinst script fails because a change has been
refused isn't - and for sure it is not a serious or grave bug,
severities often used when a postinst fails.
Opinions?
without knowing more about package x, i
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 07:52:27PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
You mean the postinst script should succeed even if the program is not
able to work? This doesn't fit with the meaning of Depends, because
what i meant was that if you're running some utility in the
postinst that might fail for some
Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-plugins - Plugins for the nagios network monitoring and management
system
nagios-plugins-basic - Plugins for the nagios network monitoring and
management system
nagios-plugins-standard - Plugins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:58:39 +0200
Source: cacti
Binary: cacti
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.6g-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:07:22 +0200
Source: nsca
Binary: nsca
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-plugins - Plugins for the nagios network monitoring and management
system
nagios-plugins-basic - Plugins for the nagios network monitoring and
management system
nagios-plugins-standard - Plugins
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:15:41PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
If a package's postrm removes the user, and the next package's postinst
just calls adduser, then the admin have no control over the reusing.
If you want to allow automatic user/group removal, then adduser should
be extended to
hey steve,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 05:29:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
In the general case, I can think of two reasons to remove users (but
leave the ids reserved): namespace pollution, and user lookup performance
when using flatfile /etc/passwd. Neither of these is particularly relevant
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:58:15PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
Leaving around unused accounts is plainly wrong too, and also a
iyho.
potential security risk. If we're going to try to push for a broad
change in how this is handled then let's do it the *right* way by
or, how about we not push
Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-nrpe-doc - Documentation for nagios-nrpe
nagios-nrpe-plugin - Nagios Remote Plugin Exectutor Plugin
nagios-nrpe-server - Nagios Remote Plugin Exectutor Server
Closes: 248424 259442 332253 333552
Changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 19:32:01 +0200
Source: nagios-images
Binary: nagios-images
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Nagios Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean
hi,
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:53:17PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
So it appears that the author is happy about modifications and
redistribution, and probably has it in his own interpretation of
freeware.
Maybe he can be talked into removing the ambiguity and formalizing it in
a clearer
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:17:37PM +0200, Willi Mann wrote:
I disagree. Where does the author say that you may modify it? I don't
think the term
You can use it in your commercial projects.
can be interpreted as you are allowed to distribute modifications. It
might be his intention, but
hi,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:26:16PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
I consider this a bug; reports sent to package@packages.debian.org
should go straight through to a maintainer or list of maintainers...
yeah. i'd say it's bad practice to have the Maintainer
field of a package not go directly to
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 03:23:27PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
yeah. i'd say it's bad practice to have the Maintainer
field of a package not go directly to the maintainer(s).
Some packages have the Maintainer: field set to a list, e.g. dpkg, apt,
tetex, probably most java packages.
i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:53:38 -0400
Source: grub-splashimages
Binary: grub-splashimages
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
hey -devel,
the zombie of gpl vs. openssl has once again arisen from the grave,
this time, in one of the packages that i maintain (nagios-plugins).
as i'm on the upstream development team as well, i've already clarified
with the other developers there that this is an omission, and that
we'll
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:12:49PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 08:59:01AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 02:56:57PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Paul TBBle Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Didn't there used to be a
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 03:59:17PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Such a tool would be very nice, and not just because of the cruft they
leave behind -- many packages currently support SSL connections; some
automatically generate a self-signed certificate upon installation,
others leave that to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:25:21 +0200
Source: cacti-cactid
Binary: cacti-cactid
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.6f-1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-common - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-mysql - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-pgsql - A host/service/network monitoring and management
hi colin,
following up on this:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 07:56:28PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 02:34:52PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
i guess i could just do it and find out, but figure asking first doesn't
exactly hurt. can we build/upload amd64 binary packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:26:52 +0200
Source: cacti-cactid
Binary: cacti-cactid
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.6e-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:14:55 +0200
Source: fbpager
Binary: fbpager
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:14:18 +0200
Source: nagios-plugins
Binary: nagios-plugins
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 03:51:15PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
2. The cure
A mmap()-able cache file format was proposed, and is generated by
gtk-update-icon-cache in /usr/share/icons/$theme/icon-theme.cache files.
It helps a lot to improve speed.
without saying more on this issue (i don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:32:57 +0200
Source: dbconfig-common
Binary: dbconfig-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:19:09 +0200
Source: nagios-plugins
Binary: nagios-plugins
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 08:33:19AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Christoph Martin a écrit :
Changes:
openssl (0.9.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release (closes: #311826)
The following list of packages needs to be rebuild, otherwise some of
the binary packages they
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 05:02:36 -0400
Source: nagios-plugins
Binary: nagios-plugins
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:41:15PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I saw this library today... I'm not so sure if it will solve the
question, as it's still alpha... Did anybody used it in a production
environment?
you're kidding me. who the hell is using 386's in a production environment?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:18:55 +0200
Source: dbconfig-common
Binary: dbconfig-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:10:15 -0400
Source: cacti
Binary: cacti
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.6g-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-common - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-mysql - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-pgsql - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-text - A host
hi,
i guess i could just do it and find out, but figure asking first doesn't
exactly hurt. can we build/upload amd64 binary packages to unstable yet?
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:29:13AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
What about user-installed blacklists? Will the new packages at least try to
convert these from blacklist format to modprobe format?
No (but feel free to send code to do it).
is it really that complicated? unless i'm missing
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 10:58:59AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I might be slow, but can you explain why we need a license for this?
I do not need to license my books, but I do need to license my
software. Why should the wiki documents be treated more like software
than a book?
your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 05:55:46 -0400
Source: cacti
Binary: cacti
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.6f-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 09:26:16PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 12:53:09PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
/run/bootchart, but there seems to be some resistance to actually trying to
standardize on /run :)
what about /dev/shm
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:15:36AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
Having a package installed doesn't mean the corresponding service is
started.
If I install something then I want it installed, configured and
running.
but you are not all users.
I think you are
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 12:53:09PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
/run/bootchart, but there seems to be some resistance to actually trying to
standardize on /run :)
what about /dev/shm?
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:44:13PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
fluently. Are you saying that people who don't read the (IMHO rather arcane)
sed regex syntax, having problems with such syntax, shouldn't touch
I am saying that
hi,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 04:50:40PM +0200, Marc Chantreux wrote:
for example, in /etc/init.d/mysqld
mysqld_get_param() {
/usr/sbin/mysqld --print-defaults \
| tr \n \
| grep -- --$1 \
| tail -n 1 \
| cut -d= -f2
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 05:22:32PM +0100, Andrew Porter wrote:
/usr/sbin/mysqld --print-defaults \
| tr \n \
| grep -- --$1 \
| tail -n 1 \
| cut -d= -f2
is harder to read than
/usr/sbin/mysqld
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 11:08:41PM +0200, Mauro Calderara wrote:
Aren't the init-scripts supposed to be posix-compilant? Often when
installing dash as /bin/sh this becomes a problem because even though
dash is posix-compatible it tends to break init-scripts for me. Whether
this is dash's fault
hi ondrej,
sorry for the delay, just got back from vacation :)
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 02:03:16PM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote:
DATABASE:
It seems that I can use dbconfig-common for database changes, I have
slight idea how to implement it, but there are some questions about it:
- can it handle
because everyone else is doing it...
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cacti
cacti-cactid
sugarplum
all three have now been uploaded with proper dependencies.
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:54:34 -0400
Source: sugarplum
Binary: sugarplum
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.10-14
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:23:24 -0400
Source: cacti
Binary: cacti
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.6f-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:28:12 -0400
Source: cacti-cactid
Binary: cacti-cactid
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.6e-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 02:35:59PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
When one does that, people file bugs complaining that the package doesn't
remove all of the data it generates on installation. :)
there's a similar problem with logfiles too, and there have been quite
drawn out discussions in which
hi phillip,
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 01:08:57PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
what's the common practise if a package gets purged and depends on
user-supplied data in a database? In this case these are DNS zones (it's
about `mydns-mysql'). Currently there is a Debconf question in postrm,
which is
hi,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:49:31AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Unless, of course, it's a shell library that would like to be reasonably
portable without being wholey crippled by lack features that have been
in every shell worth the name for ages.
I know that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:14:31 -0400
Source: sugarplum
Binary: sugarplum
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.10-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 04:12:30 -0400
Source: dbconfig-common
Binary: dbconfig-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 13:33:05 -0400
Source: cacti
Binary: cacti
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.6f-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-common - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-mysql - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-pgsql - A host/service/network monitoring and management
hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:45:09PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
i saw the bug report, i'm sorry to not have commented the request which
i find absolutely reasonable. i'll try to figure out if curl may suffer
from limitations due to the use of gnutls in place of openssl.
i would guess
hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:06:13AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 03:19:54PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
this is definitely NOT a reason to NMU libcurl. remember that it is
your package that is broken. of course you could still file a
The same issues
hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 03:40:30PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 7/18/05, sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, and the same with libmysqlclient, which is why there's no longer ssl
support in the mysql packages :(
Wouldn't it be possible to support SSL transparently
hi,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:52:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
In summary:
libs linked again ssl need at least two dev-packages:
libfoo-dev.deb and libfoo-ssl-dev.deb
Right?
No. as mentioned earlier, this is no fault of the library
packages in question, and instead is the fault
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 08:21:00PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
I don't see a gpl'd alternative to curl for internet streaming. I am
thinking about to build moc --without-curl then :(
or you could always contact the author and inform them of their
self-inflicted license violation. in my
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 09:04:57PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Why not building curl --without-sssl and --with-gnutls=/usr? Maybe a
NMU?
this is definitely NOT a reason to NMU libcurl. remember that it is
your package that is broken. of course you could still file a
wishlist bug against
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 08:11:15PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
no of course not but it would be good to have a reference
value.
it seems something that would be most appropriate as a guideline
supplied in the debian developers' reference.
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 11:51:27AM +0200, Mikael Olenfalk wrote:
it was not my intention to state that Debian is about free beer, just
that I would need
some guidance and I am willing to pay if there is a DD in stockholm
who is interested
in giving assistance. I'd prefer a face-2-face lesson
hello folks,
i'm happy to announce that after somewhere close to 8 months of
development and testing, dbconfig-common is now uploaded to unstable
and ready for widespread use by other packages in debian.
if you've missed out on my previous discussions about what dbconfig-common
can do, here's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:16:33 -0400
Source: dbconfig-common
Binary: dbconfig-common
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:30:22PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 07:07:06PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Suppose you'd like to generate a random pass by default after your
daemon is installed. How should you get that pass to the user?
Is it allowed to write it to
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 05:05:09PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
Then we would have
Debian 4.0 for etch, 4.1 for etch stable release 1, 4.2 for etch stable
release 2, 4.2a for etch stable release 2 with a minor CD mastering fix
(for example), etc.pp.
Does the release team agree with this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 08:05:17 -0400
Source: cacti
Binary: cacti
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.6f-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 07:07:06PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Suppose you'd like to generate a random pass by default after your
daemon is installed. How should you get that pass to the user?
Is it allowed to write it to a file in root's home dir?
would be very wrong to write a file into
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 07:22:45PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
I beg to disagree here. As long as an appropriate priority is used
(here, probably low) and the requirements mentioned by Petter are met
too, I don't see why using debconf for its purpose would harm,
actually.
If you use
hi,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 01:33:45PM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
can I use debconf to ask the admin what should be the default look and
feel for the editor jed? The developers-reference manual tells us to not
abuse debconf. Is this an abuse?
not necessarily, depending on how you go about it.
Maintainer Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-common - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-mysql - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-pgsql - A host/service/network monitoring and management
]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
nagios-common - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-mysql - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-pgsql - A host/service/network monitoring and management system
nagios-text - A host
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 01:11:18 -0400
Source: cacti
Binary: cacti
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.6f-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:02:47 -0400
Source: sugarplum
Binary: sugarplum
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9.10-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: sean finney [EMAIL PROTECTED
501 - 600 of 791 matches
Mail list logo
