Ben Armstrong wrote:
This property of metapackages has always irked me. If I install
gnome and then remove gnome-games, I won't automatically benefit in
the next release from any other goodies the gnome maintainers have
added to gnome package.
Amen brother.
Why aren't metapackages using
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 04:12 pm, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
For example, a new set of virus definitions, we are told, may include
a new library and a new strategy for catching viruses. Makes sense
to me. But when you add that, are you just going to add in the
latest upstream version
Eduard Bloch wrote:
It is allowing _few_ users to work around a dependency
which makes sence for everybody else, but is not really useful for
_those_ few users in their special environment.
What few users?
What special environment?
Can anyone provide a real world example of a
have the problem though, I guess.
(BTW, at what point should we trim To: and Cc:? If I had sent this to
just the bug database and debian-devel would that have been enough to
have it propogate to the right people?)
--
Brian Kimball
, and your excessive, unnecessary, and
juvenile obscenity, and here's what you get:
*plonk*
--
Brian Kimball
,
distributing or modifying this program. Included with this
distribution is the QPL licence, a copy is also available at
www.troll.no
--
Brian Kimball
6 matches
Mail list logo
