On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 02:31:16PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 09:04:24PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
Bummer, please stop that bullshit. I don't know your origin, but Lisi
Reisz doesn't sound like an Arabic, nor Indian, nor African name, so
probably your marriage
[Not subscribed, Cc if you want me to see it.]
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:19:58PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
Ian hijacked his own program back from the people who had been blocking
updates for six months
So Ian Murdock would be perfectly entitled to kick out the DAM, DPL, TC,
DSA, and all others
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 03:49:01PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 02:59:37PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
The fix should be somehow unclumsified, though. Currently I inject
some horrible runtime testing in the configure script to find out
whether the clib supports the
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:41:27AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au
[...] If people have
weighed the costs and benefits of contacting -legal and decided not to,
that's entirely their choice.
Yes, that package maintainer may choose to ignore all of policy. It's
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 04:18:15PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Friday 26 May 2006 00:50, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 25 mai 2006 à 02:36 -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
It has come to my attention that Martin Kraff used an
unofficial, and easily forge-able, identity
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 06:42:40AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
the latest upstream version of nagios-plugins has incorporated libtool
into the build process, and no longer successfully builds in a pbuilder
chroot with the following error:
The real fix there, is to not install the .la file, ever.
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:08:17AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
By reading your email, I feel you are acknowledging the fact the
ftp-masters cabal (I can't name it otherwise after seeing their behavior
IRL) is treating other developers as second-class contributors who
should just do as they
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:09:01AM -0700, Dustin Harriman wrote:
Ubuntu benefits alot from Debian. They have custom development tools
for streamlining the process of taking Debian packages and making them
into Ubuntu packages.
I'm curious: does the reverse of this exist for the convenience
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 10:15:36AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 15:23 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:26:21PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
Wouter asked:
Just out of curiosity, could you point me to arguments in favour of
Xprint?
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 09:03:19AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
There is no xorg 7.0 backport yet, and I fear it will not be easy to
add one (as the Debian xorg 7.0 introduced _major_ packaging changes,
if somebody puts up a backport it will probably be completely made
from scratch to behave as
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:58:58PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On 10/29/05, Olaf van der Spek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Does anyone know the Apache2 maintenance status?
Lots of bug reports appear to be 'ignored'.
Examples are:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 08:28:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Notice also that both you and Colin Watson, where donated pegasos machines,
(and guess who arranged that), so the unavailability of a decent build machine
is no excuse.
I can't speak for the other guys, but I have a Pegasos machine
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:51:08AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
- So the answer is right, why would you want to use XFree now?
I guess, he has unsupported hardware, ugly proprietary drivers, etc.
I don't know of any hardware supported by XFree86 4.5 that
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:22:42AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
I use sid and Gnome ; I upgraded my box (after 3 weeks in which I did
not have time to) ; now I have serious problems with fonts.
Symptoms: some programs fail to find and use the fonts ,and are then
almost unusable ; including
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 04:13:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
So, with all that said, do you still believe it is normal that a perfectly
running daily build was rejected in maybe a few minutes/hours after i sent
that email, while i had offered to continue running it until a proper
replacement
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:44:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
6) Finally, in addition to everything else that's moving out of /usr/X11R6/,
packages providing fonts for X should now install to /usr/share/fonts/X11
instead of to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts. The heirarchy is the same as
before,
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 06:18:21PM +0800, Eugene Konev wrote:
This part is broken now. So I ask you please _do not_ yet upload rebuilt
packages if you use dh_installxfonts. Or you should handle your
maintainer scripts by hand. The required (as from X11R6) changes are:
* place your *.scale
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 04:17:28PM +0300, gustavo halperin wrote:
I think that we have a problem when the common library between XFree and
/usr/lib are update in /usr/lib.
I currently have XFree 4.5, when the library libfontconfig1 was update
to version 2.3.2-1 was also updated
the file
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Christian Marillat:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Where are you reading that ?
An upstream change is a change to the Debian package, too, and listing
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:18:58PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to force a specific library version known in
${shlibs:Depends} ?
Using Depends: ${shlibs:Depends} is not really fine, if I want to
force the library to be upgraded when the primary binary package is
updated.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 04:31:10PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
I welcome the fact that you bear your responsabilities, that's a quality
fewer of us have. Though, the .la problem is not the sole one the
modular Xorg raised.
- /usr/X11R6/bin/X disapearing broke login managers (gdm, kdm)
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:52:21AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
As for the build-depends, pbuilder is, as far as I've been able to
understand it, completely incapable of handling such a massive beast as
this. You can't point it easily at a custom repository in order to have it
pull from there.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:19:40PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 10:52:21AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
I'd like for you to back this claim up. So far I've fixed dozens of bugs
over the course of the past week at great personal and
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 07:19:40PM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
I'm complaining because *you* created the huge load of bugs you have
to cope with, and a lot of other you don't warn other packagers about
(what pissed me, and made me write my previous mail is yet-another-RC
bug because of X
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
But how? sunwlxsl is something which is only present in
OpenSolaris-based
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:12:06AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Please tell me if I have this right:
* You don't like .la files
Yes.
* So you're unilaterally removing them from a core package
(libxcursor) with dozens of reverse-depends, breaking all of
them
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 06:52:52PM +0200, Marco Cabizza wrote:
I experienced the issue while recompiling some gnome packages. Is sed
s##/usr/lib/libXrender.la ##g (in the .la references, ie
libgdk-x11-2.0.la) the best temporary solution by now?
s##/usr/lib/libXrender.la##-lXrender##g, I
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:34:27PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
I can't help but get the impression Daniel may have prematurely
discounted the patch - admittedly I may not understand the issues
though.
I dismissed the X patch Sven sent me because it was fundamentally wrong.
No amount of changes to
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 12:39:42PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
So, this expulsion process looks more like a good way to hurt Sven
than anything else. If it fails (hint: it will) Andres will be
kind of singled-out,
and this whole thing will turn into I can't bear this
guy, please kick him
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:48:11AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Yes, I have tried talking to him. After a number of blowups on the
debian-kernel list, myself and a number of kernel team members have
talked to him to calm him down (and in some cases
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:29:49PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project.
I want to see you leave the Project if this expulsion process fails.
There's a defined process to
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:08:27PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I am still a bit disgusted of seeing a bug report i provided to ubuntu, with
patch and all the proper research immediately after the breezy beta go
unanswered and uncared for though, so this may color my relationship with
ubuntu, but
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 09:31:29PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 12:06:40PM -0800, John Gee wrote:
Guys honestly why aren't we as developers doing a massive overhaul on dpkg?
I feel we are running on pre-historic machines here. There needs to be at
least a little
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:05:24PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 à 16:39 +0100, Amaya a écrit :
but when will we try to solve some of the real problems we have
Hey! It's DPL election time! Lobby around. I really am biting my tongue,
but you don't have to.
Who
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:06:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 09 mars 2006 à 20:49 +0200, Daniel Stone a écrit :
I think you'll find what they're saying is, 'don't be an idiot on
mailing lists'. And here you are, being an idiot on a mailing list,
which is pretty fitting, I
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:18:22PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I haven't answered the question because it wasn't one. You are
implicitly answering it the line after, and I already know we disagree
on this matter.
Let me rephrase:
'Who exactly are the candidates claiming there are no
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 07:05:34PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
Michael Banck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, I don't think GNOME bashing is really on-topic here.
It's not gnome bashing, it's just airing of a very common gripe with
gnome. If there were indeed a viable fork that improved on
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 07:56:42PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The solution would be to convince Ubuntu to branch from stable instead
of sid. The problem is that this creates a lot of work for Ubuntu
because they have to backport all of the desired bleeding-edge stuff.
However, Debian
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 06:12:36PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
la, 2006-02-18 kello 10:43 -0500, Michael Poole kirjoitti:
What's the purpose of an assembler without assembly code to use it on?
It can be used, for example, to assemble code you write yourself. That
is, after all, the primary
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 17:05 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I'm starting to suspect you do not trust the release team nor the
porters to make good judgement [...]
^^^
Nono... of course not!
It's just my personal experience that this
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 09:04 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:58:19PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
Right. My solution for that was to split them into a separate
mesa-utils source package, with a slightly hacked Makefile. They
build just fine independently
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 01:34 +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
The wiki markup languages of twiki and moin-moin are not
compatible. Still it would be nice to have some content moved
from the old .net wiki to the new .org one. (the debconf team for
one is interested in using the features of
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 22:00 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 12:07:46PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
Sorry, I've really just not had any time recently, and there are some
things I wanted to clean up before I fired off to you (e.g. the
Build-Dep on glut, which
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 17:25 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
Daniel also said he'd send a package via email which I never got, so I
went ahead and did my own thing. (No Matt, I'm not happy with the idea
of fishing patches out of some random, cluttered, and very unusable
webpage;
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:33:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005.08.19.1422 +0200]:
Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS,
arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian
Weimer lists on
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 02:59:17PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Steinar H. Gunderson]
How do you make this work? Last time I tried it, X would only show
the one connected to the ???active??? virtual console, and blanked
the other.
It need some patches to the kernel and X. I'm not
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Daniel Stone]
Ubuntu implements this from the installer down (although only for
the special cases of four nVidia, MGA, or ATI cards, and even then
you may need to fiddle with the configuration a little bit
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:50:41PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
wasnt it me who included the interesting patches into the
*debian* kernel a year ago?
Depends if you want multiseat X or multiseat VTs, but hearty
congratulations in any case. Well done.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 04:28:56PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
I know, but as written before, IMHO the abi version number should
not be encoded in the package name. Usually you just get a new
abi, but no new functionality, so why introduce a new name? Just
to work around the limitations of
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:02:09AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
I see that yesterday a modularized xserver (xorg) entered ubuntu
breezy (the current development branch) archives.
I've some questions: Is XSF coordinating its work with them or what ?
Is modularized xorg a goal for us ? I think
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:43:50AM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 7/14/05, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The server hasn't been modularised yet, it's just that I split up all
the packaging. I've been working closely with Josh Triplett on the
libraries, and keeping David fully
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:54:08PM -0500, Ian Murdock wrote:
Daniel Stone wrote:
libc6 added interfaces between 2.3.2 and 2.3.5 and made several other
major changes, so all packages built with .5 depend on .5 or above,
in case you use one of the new interfaces.
A binary built
to our users. Members of both the XSF,
including myself and Josh Triplett (who's already begun this work) and
Ubuntu developers (Daniel Stone) will be working on this together. My goal
is to have as close a tree for both Ubuntu and Debian as possible,
preferrably the same tree, but again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 15:09:41 +1000
Source: xrender
Binary: libxrender1-dbg libxrender-dev libxrender1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 15:07:11 +1000
Source: render
Binary: render-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 09:07:52AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 02:57:23AM +0100, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
* Three bodies (Security, System Administration, Release) are given
independent veto power over the inclusion of an architecture.
A) Does the
: Dbus Maintainance Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
dbus-1 - simple interprocess messaging system
dbus-1-dev - simple interprocess messaging system (development headers)
dbus-1-doc - simple interprocess messaging system (documentation)
dbus-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:34:37 -0700
Source: hal
Binary: libhal-dev hal-doc libhal0 hal
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.2.97-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Martin Waitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 23:06:17 +1000
Source: dbtcp
Binary: libdbd-dbftp-perl dbtcp php4-dbtcp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.17-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel
: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
dbus-1 - simple interprocess messaging system
dbus-1-dev - simple interprocess messaging system (development headers)
dbus-1-doc - simple interprocess messaging system (documentation)
dbus-1-utils
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
dbus-1 - simple interprocess messaging system
dbus-1-dev - simple interprocess messaging system (development headers)
dbus-1-doc - simple interprocess messaging system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:40:19 +1100
Source: libapache2-mod-xslt
Binary: libapache2-mod-xslt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.9+rc1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.0.48-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
apache2-common - Next generation, scalable, extendable web server
apache2-doc - Documentation for apache2
apache2
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:58:44PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:32:14AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:58:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I think it would be really dumb for a driver author to re-use an
existing name for a different
want to wait until fd.o deems it
ready.
Getting tired of this,
Daniel
--
Daniel Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian X Strike Force:http://people.debian.org/~branden/xsf/
pgptpPMZhrwjn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 06:58:15PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 03:59:48PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:56:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
I thought about the latter as well. It's not too long-winded if we
expect having input
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-11-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xserver-freedesktop
Version : (unreleased)
Upstream Author : Keith Packard [EMAIL PROTECTED] and other
freedesktop.org hackers
* URL :
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-11-12
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xlibs-freedesktop
Version : (unreleased)
Upstream Author : Jim Gettys [EMAIL PROTECTED], and other
freedesktop.org hackers
* URL :
of source package Xu-ification (no really; it would be
a good thing).
--
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The programs are documented fully by _The Rise and Fall of a Fooish Bar_,
available by the Info system. -- debian/manpage.sgml.ex, dh_make template
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 11:56:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:03:14AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
There is one unreachable person; IIRC, he was a reasonably major
contributor.
Double bummer.
Aye; sort of condemns it to external DDKdom.
I was thinking about
a bit unsure about XFree configuration after
installation. I'll simply provide a sample configuration and big fat
README.Debian
The synaptics README has sample configurations in it.
--
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The programs are documented
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 12:32:43 +1000
Source: libapache2-mod-xslt
Binary: libapache2-mod-xslt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.9+rc1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:32:56 +1100
Source: dbtcp
Binary: libdbd-dbftp-perl dbtcp php4-dbtcp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.17-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 11:56:52 +1000
Source: dbtcp
Binary: libdbd-dbftp-perl dbtcp php4-dbtcp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.17-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:12:24 +1000
Source: libapache2-mod-xslt
Binary: libapache2-mod-xslt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.9+rc1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:54:53 +1000
Source: dbus
Binary: dbus-glib-1-dev dbus-1-utils dbus-1 dbus-glib-1 dbus-1-doc dbus-1-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.13-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:24:43 +1000
Source: libapache2-mod-xslt
Binary: libapache2-mod-xslt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.9+rc1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:13:06 +1000
Source: dbus
Binary: dbus-glib-1 dbus-1-doc dbus-glib-1-dev dbus-1-utils dbus-1 dbus-1-dev
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.12-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:18:23 +1000
Source: libapache2-mod-xslt
Binary: libapache2-mod-xslt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.9+rc1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 16:10:44 +1000
Source: dbtcp
Binary: libdbd-dbftp-perl dbtcp php4-dbtcp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: debbackup
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.trinity.unimelb.edu.au/~dstone/debbackup/
(not functional yet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 16:17:27 +1000
Source: libapache2-mod-xslt
Binary: libapache2-mod-xslt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.9+rc1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel
on nVidia to fix my bugs, or make the kernel module not use up
1mb RSS, or whatever.
Daniel, happily with his Freely out-of-the-box 3D-accelerated r250.
--
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
pgpseTCKzQvX8
-src http://www.trinity.unimelb.edu.au/~dstone/debian/ dbtcp/
Cheers!
:) d
--
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgpIMvUk8ZAZH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 09:06:40PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
Gentlemen,
I've restored Galeon on pila to its former 1.2.x glory. A few packages
(galeon, galeon-common, mozilla-browser, mozilla-psm, libnss3, libnspr4)
are now on hold: don't touch them (and watch apt quietly playing
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 10:07:07PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
[stuff utterly irrelevant to -devel]
Please ignore the parent post; somehow, mutt managed to take a mail sent
to 'oldk, bhat', and reply to -devel. *shrug*.
Sorry,
Daniel
--
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
progress?
Well, this isn't a problem for buildds, because I made libstdc++5-dev
the preference.
2) Is libstdc++5-3.3 ABI-compatible with libstdc+5? Does the former
have any symbols that the latter lacks?
I *believe* it's completely ABI-compatible, but I could be wrong.
--
Daniel Stone
libmimelib1 libkdenetwork2-dev ktalkd kdict lisa
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 4:3.1.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christopher L Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
kdenetwork - KDE Network metapackage
kdenetwork-kfile-plugins
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christopher L Cheney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
kaddressbook - KDE NG addressbook application
kalarm - KDE alarm message scheduler
kandy - KDE mobile phone utility
karm - KDE time tracker
moot point, because it probably won't go in for over a month,
even if gcc 3.2 on SPARC is finally fixed.
Daniel, occasional KDE package monkey
--
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgpvej4IVvfI5.pgp
Description
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 10:02:34AM +0100, Michael Meskes scrawled:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 05:17:19PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
Secondly, ftpmasters have to add overrides for new packages, in case you
didn't realize. That takes time: their time adding them, and our time
waiting. We're
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 2:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my
packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of
my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreciate
bit. I chroot it by hand, and I find it
insanely nifty, even though bind9 isn't plagued by the same security
problems bind is. Helps me sleep better at night, or something.
--
Daniel Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wolfie who needs a girlfriend
wolfie i have
will be forthcoming, or, preferably: Plague, and LART, will be
forthcoming.
But wait! Still more errors! You really mean, are forthcoming, not
will be forthcoming, right?
I hope so.
--
Daniel Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bod subtle?
bod and Overfiend
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 12:24:11PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Sat 12 Jan 2002, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 01:12:37PM +1100, Steve Kowalik wrote:
At 10:30 am, Saturday, January 12 2002, Rob Bradford mumbled:
I'm now a happy evolution user, to converyt my mail i did
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 01:13:53PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh, there *appears* to be one? You mean the one I sent this message to,
and the one that I'm subscribed to? Right! Thanks for the information! I
sent it to -devel because not all KDE
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:29:34AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:00:30AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
I'll stop posting to -devel when you come up with the guideline that
says don't post important stuff about one of the two major desktop
environments breaking
to note that Debian, a distro with
~850 developers and a dedicated security team, is behind Slackware on
security issues.
d
--
Daniel Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may make you think you have mystical
Kung Fu
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 09:14:21AM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
There appears to be a list named debian-kde. PLEASE use that. -devel
is already clogged enough, and should be reserved for extremely
general or miscellaneous discussion.
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:17:08 +1100
From: Daniel Stone
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:26:01PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
*
|libqt3-psql (#127709), orphaned 7 days ago
Uhm, shouldn't Daniel Stone or Cheney (sp?) take this one as well, I
guess it builds with the rest of qt3.
I'm not sure if Chris is taking this along with libqt3.
|qt
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
