Hi,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 12:24:09AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
So upgraded systems don't get the benefits of certain changes to the
installer's
defaults, or defaults in programs used by the installer.
[...] Perhaps people could comment on other things like this which
they've
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 11:21:59AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
You cannot distribute GPL'd source which has been modified to link to
a GPL-incompatible library when the only way the source would be
useful is if it is, in fact, linked to that library.
Just for me to learn
Hi Anthony,
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 09:50:10AM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:09:30PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
As a final note, did anyone from Debian who usually examines licences
actually examine this one?
Yes.
What did he/she think about the following
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:14:49 +0100
Source: chbg
Binary: chbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:38:05 +0100
Source: compilercache
Binary: compilercache
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.10-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:45:49 +0100
Source: sanduhr
Binary: sanduhr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Moritz,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 01:50:53PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Glest is a free fantasy 3D real time strategy game with impressive graphics.
See http://www.josezanni.com/glest/descargas/demoglest_v1.2.mpg for a demo
video.
I tried the game and found it truely impressive (except
Hello Robert,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 07:31:21AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 12:59:07PM +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
It uses gnugo as its
engine and you must have a recent version of gnugo installed in order to
run
it.
This statement is unnecessary. You
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:55:40AM -0500, James Vega wrote:
Indicating that gnugo is the engine is relevant, but specifying that a
recent version of gnugo need be installed is not. In fact, that part of
the description could become invalid depending on the development of
both gnugo and
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 02:08:45PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
According to slashdot articles you can generate human readable files
(like the Packages file) with md5sum collision in ~45minutes on a
modern cpu now.
I found the example at http://www.cits.rub.de/MD5Collisions/ quite
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 03:24:54PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
None, many of these examples were created before the collision
generation tools were generally available. The exploit uses some
properties of Postscript files which make them not very desirable for
storing electronic
Hi Ryan,
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:38:43PM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
Also, I've investigated the mail backlog on master and found the main
problem. The mail queue is currently full of email that will never be
able to be delivered, all for one particular user.
Why would that be?
Could you
Hi Florian,
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 09:33:53AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Given kasserver.com's recent connectivity issues, I wouldn't consider
that admissable evidence. 8-P
I thought these were resolved as of 24 October. Were there
problems afterwards?
And then there is still this 5 and a
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 07:04:02PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
There were also some bugs for tetex-* that were never sent to the
Maintainer: field, namely the debian-tetex-maint mailing list.
Here is another one. The following message (related to bug #335689)
spend six days in the
Hi Noah,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:22:39PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
It depends on what you mean by up to date. If we're only including
glibc headers, then we can only use functionality that glibc supports.
If we bypass glibc and directly use kernel functionality, then we get
all the
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 04:04:35PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 12:37 pm, Jochen Voss wrote:
This software may not be sold or incorporated into any product which is
sold without prior permission from SoftSound. When no charge is made,
this software may
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 02:43:42PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
SHORTEN SOFTWARE LICENSE
This software is being provided to you, the LICENSEE, by Tony Robinson
and SoftSound under the following license. By obtaining, using and/or
copying this software, you agree that you have read,
Hi Goswin,
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:55:19AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
subscribing [the initial submitter] is already the current way.
Really? Since when is this the case?
Jochen
--
http://seehuhn.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello Mike,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:02:38PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
Done. Also, adjacent packages in the dependency graph which are part of
the same source package do not increase the level a package lies in
(as suggested by Jochen Voss).
Very nice. I am happy to see that the depth
Hello Steve,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 05:25:35PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
I think 2 min/pkg for *spotting* problems is reasonable, but not nearly
enough for fixing them. Decent writing is non-trivial.
Especially for cases like where some research is necessary to find out
what the package
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:12:41AM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
Especially for cases like where some research is necessary to find out
what the package actually does. Some randomly chosen examples where
the function of the package is not clear to me from reading the
description:
I looked
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 01:24:33PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
After starting writing a program to help me track my packages
dependencies for the g++ transition, I decided to put up the results for
the entire archive in case it was useful for others.
Looks useful.
Just to let you know:
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 04:44:11PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
Jochen Voss wrote:
Just to let you know: ...
yep, same bug.
I found another one ;-)
The entry configlet(configlet-frontends) should be level 6 instead of 8.
The tree starts out as
configlet-frontends
* python
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:33:56 +0100
Source: chbg
Binary: chbg
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.5-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 08:33:42AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
7. Fix up the all the silly typos made in every BTS email sent so
far and retransmit. (note: this is after the BTS has decided to
respond).
! [1]
8. upload the changes to source code.
9. realize that I
Hello Manoj,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 08:30:57PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Yeah. I should have realized the level of audience I was
trying to talk to. I'll try to speak in words of fewer syllables the
next time around.
You are actively damaging the project with remarks like
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:20:47AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 11:42:40PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
There is also the quite important point that even the most stupid of the
attackers could just look at ~/.bash_profile instead and get all or most
of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 17:37:16 +0100
Source: chbg
Binary: chbg
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.5-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 18:21:10 +
Source: fdutils
Binary: fdutils
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 5.4-20040228-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL
Hello,
suddenly I start to get mighty frightening error messages:
plonk:~# apt-get install --reinstall dpkg
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 2 not
upgraded.
Need to get 0B/1656kB of
Hello Martin,
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 08:51:38PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
It's fixed in debconf 1.4.44 which just got accepted today.
Thank you for the quick answer.
* Fix a rogue quotation mark intorduced in the translatable string patch
in the previous version. Closes: #293666
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 02:34:17PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Santiago Vila wrote:
If you want to make policy that /usr/bin should only contain executables,
go ahead, make a policy proposal,
There is no policy issue here -- the FHS is already entirely clear on
this; /usr/bin is
Hello John,
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 11:46:12AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Jochen Voss writes:
Any references for this? I was a little bit disappointed that the FHS
was so unclear about /usr/bin and I do not know where else to look.
While the FHS is not as explicit as it might
/
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Jochen Voss wrote:
Package: gettext-base
Version: 0.14.1-8
Severity: normal
Hello,
the gettext-base package installs the file gettext.sh into the
/usr/bin/ directory. The file looks like a shell script first,
but it has
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 11:31:52AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
looking at the script snippet in question, all it does is set a couple
functions/variables, so it certainly should not be in /usr/bin. hell,
it's not even executable.
Yes, this was my point.
All the best,
Jochen
--
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:40:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
You forgot to quote last thing I said when closing the bug.
So I'll repeat: Please read the logs for non-bug Bug#292759, where the
author explains the rationale for putting gettext.sh in /usr/bin.
Sorry, I did not find relevant
Hello John,
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 10:45:00AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Jochen Voss writes:
until now I was under the impression that /usr/bin/ should only contain
programs which are expected to be directly called by users.
In bug #292759 the maintainer of gettext-base claims
Hello Santiago,
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 06:06:31PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
Because we already have /usr/bin for that and there is no need to
change every script that uses gettext.
The for that is my question. Do you have any reference
for this usage of /usr/bin? Is this suggested to put
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:28:09 +
Source: chbg
Binary: chbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:17:10 +
Source: chbg
Binary: chbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 10:57:00PM -0500, Dafydd Harries wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: fl-cow
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Davide Libenzi
* URL : http://xmailserver.org/flcow.html
* License : GPL
Description :
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 06:30:02AM -0700, BugScan reporter wrote:
Package: screen (debian/main)
Maintainer: Adam Lazur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
269366 [] [U] screen: ftbfs [sparc] no tgetent - no screen
Where does the [U] come from? I do not see the upstream bug tag
set on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 00:11:51 +0100
Source: fdutils
Binary: fdutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.4-20040228-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:05:23 +
Source: docbook-xsl
Binary: docbook-xsl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.64.1.0-4.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:32:52 +
Source: fdutils
Binary: fdutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.4-20030718-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:23:44 +
Source: docbook-xsl
Binary: docbook-xsl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.64.1.0-4.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:53:41 +
Source: chbg
Binary: chbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:26:02 +
Source: sanduhr
Binary: sanduhr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:25:00 +
Source: compilercache
Binary: compilercache
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:27:29 +
Source: fdutils
Binary: fdutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.4-20030718-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
A minor fix for the common blurb of all the descriptions:
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:52:13AM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
3Dwm is the Three-Dimensional Workspace Manager. It defines a full user
environment with support for three-dimensional user interfaces using a 3D
widget kit. It
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:30:26PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
Which is better? I like the default keys because you learn how to use
nvi very efficiently knowing the hjkl-style keys :)
I am in favour of both :-O
* The hjkl style keys are really impossible to remember.
So of course the
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 12:29:31PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Real men use hjkl.
And Real Real Men even use a German keyboard for this,
where Y and Z are exchanged. So going to the north-west
ist more fun :-)
Jochen
--
http://seehuhn.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 12:33:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Sort using what locale?
How many users know the locale name of their language?
Sorting has big problems.
What about grouping by continent and only
sorting within these groups? This would be
comprehensible by the user and lead
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 02:13:33PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
One posts suggested that fr_FR would be on the lists for both America
and Asia. Portuguese is spoken on four continents, and I think the
Brazilian Portuguese translations are sufficiently complete that many
other
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:20:34PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
So Debian users in Angola or East Timor would have to click on either
South America or Europe to be shown a Portuguese language option,
since there are currently no d-i translators for either of these
locales?
Yes, I see that
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:46:18PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
Not in Debian at least. XML catalog support is a work-in-progress at
this point. Last time I checked, neither docbook-xsl or docbook-xml
registered themselves using update-xmlcatalog.
I've been meaning to write some
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 03:41:36PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
snip -
Package: popsneaker
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: mail
Installed-Size: 159
Maintainer: Stefan Baehre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 0.6.2-1
Depends:
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:48:24AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:20:36PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
That sounds backwards. Component is the one recognized by apt, and
(naturally) the one used by official Release files in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 14:26:01 +0200
Source: fdutils
Binary: fdutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.4-20030718-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
by accident I discovered bug #200180 at the fdutils bug report page
http://bugs.debian.org/fdutils
I was surprised to see this, because I never got a notification for
this bug via email (despite the fact that I'm the package maintainer).
The BTS claims to have sent the norification
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 17:22:17 +0200
Source: fdutils
Binary: fdutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.4-20030528-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 08:45:51PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
I'm going to focus only on your claim that this page shows an example
of the violation of monotonicity by Manoj's proposal.
Monotonicity (http://electionmethods.org/evaluation.html#MC) requires
With the relative order or
Hello,
I think that John's modification is a good thing.
Hereby I second the amendment quoted below.
Jochen
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 12:19:33PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
--- proposal-srivasta Fri May 16 09:42:59 2003
+++ proposal-jaqque Mon May 19 11:43:13 2003
@@ -1,139 +1,139 @@
Hello Raul,
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 04:57:18PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
Hard to understand? We'd require a certain level of voter approval
before we'll consider an option -- options which don't achieve that
can't win. How is this hard to understand?
The thing which is hard to understand, is
Hello,
For those of you, who want to make a well-informed decision
in the upcoming general resolution about our voting system,
the following web page should be interesting.
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/comp/vote.html
There I put together pointers to all relevant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:51:31 +0100
Source: chbg
Binary: chbg
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 18:31:43 +0100
Source: sanduhr
Binary: sanduhr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
a friend of mine recently bought some Debian woody CDs.
Because the CDs do not look very official she wants to
verify that these are really Debian CDs and not something
trojanized.
I suggested to her to compare the output of
md5sum /dev/cdrom
with the corresponding values from
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:13:33PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
There's now a 'submitter' command, so you can do something like:
submitter 34363 Oskar Liljeblad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It notifies the original submitter, and doesn't affect merged bugs in
the way close/reopen does. Unless
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 04:27:47PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
Unfortunately, version 1.0.3-2.2 is disappearing from mirrors,
leaving only 2.1.0-1 and 0.9.6-1. I was lucky to be able to
get version 1.0.3-2.2 from a slow-to-update mirror.
You can always retrive old files from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 18:28:00 +0100
Source: fdutils
Binary: fdutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.4-20021102-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hallo?
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:20:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Over six months ago, on 2001-11-14, [...]
Huh? At what time do you live?
Confused,
Jochen
--
Omm
(0)-(0)
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:13:40PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Jochen writes:
I think I incorporated all gdialog patches you sent to the BTS. Or did I
miss something?
All those bugs appear to have been fixed, though I see no mention of my
patches in the changelog.
Sorry! Maybe I did
Hello,
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 08:34:36PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
Sean Middleditch writes:
Perhaps bugs should be filed against them, for their lack of
compatibility, if indeed there are problems?
I filed a bug against gdialog (gnome-utils, to be exact) with a complete
set of patches a
Hello!
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 11:04:15AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 04:50:31PM +0200, Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
heard to say:
-- size doesn't match for /home/debian/devel/sanduhr_1.0.orig.tar.gz
If the .orig.tar.gz is a symlink, see #138821.
My
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 08:09:47PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
Package: pgi
Version: 0.9.6
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Just for the record: I got bitten by this, too.
(But I had a backup for most of the stuff :-)
Jochen
--
Fri Apr 12 16:40:59 2002 CEST using DSA key ID 211B1025
gpg: Good signature from Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: aka Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: aka Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg: aka Jochen Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg
Hi Bastian,
I tried to test your omniorb packages,
but did not get far. Compiling IDL files
into stubs does not work for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~/zzz] omniidl -bpython /usr/share/idl/sanduhr.idl
sh: /usr/lib/python2.1/site-packages/omnicpp: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht
gefunden
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 07:15:53PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Sean Neakums wrote:
How about listing packages that are orphaned on DWN once, when it
happens, with a pointer to the full list of orphaned packages?
Something like:
Three packages were orphaned this week: blah,
Hi,
there used to be a package called dput,
but now I cannot find it anymore. For example
visiting
http://packages.debian.org/dput
shows the message No responses to your query
and aptitude lists it as an obsolete package.
What happened to this package? Was it renamed?
Or did a do
Hi,
for me the dhelp package does not work at all, because of the problem
described in bug reports 109207, 109849, 110411, 110433, 110538,
111044, 112614, and 112659. My question is, does the package work for
anybody at all? Is there any easy way to make it work again?
Otherwise all these bugs
Hi,
there is an 103 days old IPT for a compilercache package (bug #100538).
I asked the submitter whether he is still interested in this,
but got no answer. So I would like to package this myself.
Description: a caching wrapper around compilers to speed up compilations
Compilercache is a
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 09:59:55PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 06:02:07PM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
Description: a caching wrapper around compilers to speed up compilations
Compilercache is a wrapper around your C and C++ compilers. Each
time you compile something
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 04:46:19PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Please note that did not ITPed it since I'm not sure people except
from me are interested in such a browser. And It does not seem to make
you very happy. Unless people are interested to see it in debian
I won't upload
85 matches
Mail list logo
