On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 11:23:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 02:34:39AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
1) This situation does not stop a running machine from working, it will
only
stop it from booting.
Oh, well, as long as THAT'S all it is...
Heh, it's not
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:52:25PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
...
5) A Debian Developer will never knowingly run a production server on
unstable and will never encourage a non-developer to run unstable.
...
Tou want to forbid that:
- I run
Yes, I am sure most people would. However, I have noticed that normal posts
on topics of this nature are handily dispatched with singular consistancy,
usually with reference to historical discussion buried somewhere deep in the
list archives. Or just ignored.
Been lurking here for 2 years
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
After reading this nice diskussion with all it's aspects, I want to
complete the mess and suggest a distribution called
e.g. progressive beetween stable(frozen) and unstable.
I gather you haven't read the discussion of package pools in the
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 11:02:04AM -0500, Mark Mealman wrote:
I really don't like unstable either, but I've pretty much abandoned the
stable tree as too behind the times back when slink was nearing freeze.
Here's a serious question for you: which parts are too old on slink
to perform
On 12-Mar-00, 10:56 (CST), Ron Farrer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree! (surprise ;) I personally know of about ~4 people who were
turned away from slink because GNOME and KDE were so OLD. I personally
got around this by running potato (unstable then), but most people don't
WANT to
Is it possible for commercial software to make it into the Debian
archives(presumably in non-free)?
A lot of commercial software uses license keys to control otherwise
freely downloadable software. And being able to upgrade wordperfect,
blender and vmware via apt-get upgrade would be this lazy
-Original Message-
From: Brian Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Phillip R. Jaenke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Brent Fulgham [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-devel@lists.debian.org
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Date: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: evan leibovitch and the LPI certification tests
On Tue, May 18, 1999 at 03:16:38PM -0700, Craig Brozefsky wrote:
Debian, so far, has been very popular in academia, hobbyist and
research circles, but doesn't appear to be a big player in the retail
and commercial fields.
Well damn, I work for one of the US's largest insurance brokerage
9 matches
Mail list logo
