On Jan 15, 2006, at 8:58 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Steve Dunham wrote:
I haven't had time for Debian in a long while - I've held on for a
while because I've enjoyed working for Debian, but I don't think I'll
find time again. Now I'm renovating a house and have switched to OSX,
so it's time I
long.
I'd like to offer these three packages for adoption: x-symbol, xmix,
and oneko.
x-symbol is probably the most used of these and needs someone who
knows emacsen and a little TeX.
The others could probably disappear without anyone noticing.
Steve Dunham
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:39:22 -0700
Source: amaya
Binary: amaya
Architecture: source i386
Version: 8.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 08:52:43 -0800
Source: amaya
Binary: amaya-gtk amaya amaya-lesstif
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 8.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 09:49:08 -0700
Source: amaya
Binary: amaya-gtk amaya-lesstif amaya
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 8.1b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:57:42 -0700
Source: amaya
Binary: amaya-gtk amaya amaya-lesstif
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 8.1a-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:29:35 -0700
Source: amaya
Binary: amaya-gtk amaya amaya-lesstif
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 8.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 18:41:07 -0700
Source: amaya
Binary: amaya-gtk amaya amaya-lesstif
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 8.0-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 08:36:37 -0700
Source: amaya
Binary: amaya-gtk amaya amaya-lesstif
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 8.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 19:27:08 -0800
Source: amaya
Binary: amaya-gtk amaya amaya-lesstif
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 7.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 05:30:13PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
I will not do it myself since I know nothing about CGI programming,
CGI programming is easy to learn ;-)
CGI scripts or programs get whatever the client sends on his URL,
starting after the '?' as a parameter,
of these (and the library) need headers from a recent kernel source
tree.
I've attached my changes to get racoon to compile, in case you're
interested. Mostly tweaks because our glibc has functions that
the source doesn't think __linux__ has.
Steve Dunham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- iputils.orig/racoon
depending on what locale you are using. The
command:
locale -ck code_set_name charmap
can tell you what charset you need to use.
Viel Glück,
Steve Dunham
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cse.msu.edu/~dunham
Shyamal Prasad wrote:
Russell Surely someone must have written something similar to TCP
Russell but implemented on top of UDP.
Too many people have tried this ;-) Try SCTP, a recent attempt to deal
with the reliable UDP solution:
The 2.5.50 kernel has a SCTP implementation. Dunno how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 10:38:49 -0800
Source: x-symbol
Binary: x-symbol
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.43-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:14:15 -0800
Source: xmix
Binary: xmix
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:06:27 -0700
Source: x-symbol
Binary: x-symbol
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.43-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 12:12:31 -0700
Source: x-symbol
Binary: x-symbol
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.43-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:48:44 -0700
Source: x-symbol
Binary: x-symbol
Architecture: source all
Version: 4.43-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 10:20:41 -0700
Source: oneko
Binary: oneko
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.sakura.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 12:40:28 -0700
Source: amaya
Binary: amaya-common amaya-gtk amaya-lesstif
Architecture: source i386
Version: 6.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 10:54:50 -0700
Source: amaya
Binary: amaya-common amaya-gtk amaya-lesstif
Architecture: source i386
Version: 6.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.ora.com/catalog/debian/
I just noticed this page has a book cover for forthcoming Learning Debian
GNU/Linux book from O'Reilly.
What do people think about the art? Looks like that guy has climed onto a
bucking bull -- or is it a GNU? -- and is
Jonathan Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With Debian distributions, and small disks, I have found this to always be
sufficient:
/ 32M
/var 96M
swap 32M or more.
/usr all the rest
/home is a symlink to /usr/home
/tmp is a symlink to /var/tmp
So what happens to the stuff in
Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 05:24:08AM -0700, Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
[...]
Notably, I'm going to be writing it in C++. This will add
about 270k to the boot disks' root image, but as the floppy
install methods are for the most part phasing
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
Previously Martin Bialasinski wrote:
Do I have access to the net within that environment? I just have some
pre-release slink CDs, so I have to upgrade to the current point
release by ftp (by an ISDN
Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 02:28:16PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
PAM:
Ben Collins sponsored full pamification as a release goal. The main
packages that need work are the shadow suite, and xdm.
/me blinks...
has nis (the package) been
Richard Braakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Please send followups to this mail to debian-devel, not
debian-devel-announce)
This is what I learned from the responses to the previous announcement.
Boot disks:
CD Images:
Architectures:
PAM:
Perl 5.005:
Library dependencies:
Samuel Tardieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 10/05, Richard Braakman wrote:
| * glibc 2.1 upgrade
| As far as I know, this project is largely complete. There are one or two
| bugs left in the backward compatibility code, and there's the question
| of what to do with /dev/pts.
Not
Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
Previously Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
Is there any way of changing that default behaviour (e.g. some config
file) apart from recompiling dpkg? I'd like to leave it disabled at all
times no matter what the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale E. Martin) writes:
Oscar Levi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my opinion, this problem is not sufficient to warrant an upload at
this time since, contrary to the bug reporters claim, it does not
prevent the packing from functioning. It is annoying, yes.
Interesting
Jim Pick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, January 29 1999, Ionutz Borcoman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro
te:
|Hi,
|
|Is the gnuclient/gnuserv broken in XEmacs ? Using the latest versions
|from potato I am no more able to start a gnuclient :-( Is
Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve Dunham wrote:
ii xemacs20-bin20.4-13Editor and kitchen sink
ii xemacs20-nomule 20.4-13Editor and kitchen sink
^
The problem only shows up with the mule versions of xemacs.
Nope, because I only
Anders Hammarquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The patches that I sent you should be completely safe. But the
resulting packages have only been tested by me. (As I said, I took
out the -pedantic flag on the altdev stuff - the other changes don't
touch x86 at all.)
Right, at least my
Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, January 29 1999, Ionutz Borcoman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro
te:
|Hi,
|
|Is the gnuclient/gnuserv broken in XEmacs ? Using the latest versions
|from potato I am no more able to start a gnuclient :-( Is anybody else
|experiencing this ?
I've
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 07:27:28AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Does it? You mean, that hack in ld.so that adds /usr/lib/libc5 to the
library search path in certain circumstances? The hack is incomplete,
you just have to fix it.
Have you
Note to Def
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is what I hope to be the final test build of XFree86 3.3.2.3a-9; if
there are no significant problems it will be released with that version
number. This test build addresses all four release-critical bugs currently
outstanding
M.C. Vernon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would see this as a RH-style - so a rather bloated kernel which includes
lots of stuff as standard, and asks them the pertinent questions all at
once at the beginning, and then gets on with it.
Excuse me, but RedHat actually boots on my laptop because
Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 10:02:52PM -0500, Brian White wrote:
No. We had enough problems upgrading from 2.0.35 to 2.0.36. This would
be a major change and have corresponding reprocussions. I'm sure it's
very stable, but it will have
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I said before, rpm does have the capability to install 2 different
versions of a package simulantaneously. Here's how it works, to the best of
my knowledge.
User interface:
Rpm differentiates between installing a package and upgrading a package.
Brian White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
pilot-link31806 pilot-link: Can't build from source
This bug was filed against the 0.9.0 package and the 0.8.11 package is
installed in slink.
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ben Gertzfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin == Martin Schulze [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Fixed by moving #include stdio.h five lines up. I
Martin fixed it but forget about it, since it was *that* easy.
Martin Not even worth mentioning.
Er, in which file? The file
Thomas Gebhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
the configuration files of all debian packages are located in /etc.
That's really fine.
But the package manager stores its configuration (access method,
list of selected packages, ...) somewhere in /var/lib/dpkg. Why?
Configuration goes in
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just saw that nedit's layout changed. Between menu and text there is a hug
gray area that hasn't been there before. Since I also experienced missing
buttons in mpsql I wonder if both are related to lesstifg. Guess I try to
reget the old version.
Keita Maehara [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been working on a CD specific install that basically delivers a
standard system with cp -a that could be used to also construct a
live file system. I'll let you know how it works out, if I can ever get
back to working on it.
I've tried to
Shaleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I 100% agree w/ you. Now make it work (-: I have compiled Imlib on
my own box and I can link w/ only -lImlib. However every other
person I know of, linux or otherwise needs to use the -lgfx libs.
Imlib is merely a common interface to the gfx libs. It hides
Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun 04 Oct 1998, Brian Almeida wrote:
I just talked to Shaleh, the previous Imlib maintainer. It was
intentional to use libjpegg6a for imlib. 6a and 6b do not play
well together. Your NMU
Is it necessary that they play _together_ ?
Jim Pick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
libjpeg6b is broken and shouldn't be used by any new packages. It
doesn't respect the upstream maintainers choice of soname, namely
libjpeg.so.62, and hence makes Debian incompatible with Red Hat.
(RedHat
Brian Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 10:57:25AM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
Let's do something compatible with Red Hat (unless there are good
reasons not to). Synchronizing SONAMEs is one of the goals of the
LSB. If we are going to switch to libjpeg62 - let's do so
Tom Lees [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Oct 02, 1998 at 03:18:13PM +0200, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wrote:
Hi,
Enrique Zanardi schrieb am 02. Oktober 1998:
Moving X to the base disks (Auch!) and configuring X just after the first
reboot (hard task for a newbie). I'm not excited about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam P. Harris) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory S. Stark) writes:
I asked once earlier, but no one responded:
Does anyone know how PAM modules should be packaged?
Gregory, I'm sorry I cannot provide good technical information. I do
know that we had backed out
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam P. Harris) writes:
Norbert Veber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What sorts of things can pam do? I only know that for example a
long program that uses PAM works regardless of weather the
password file is shadowed or not, but can it do more advanced
authentication,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am just, out of my inherent curiosity, curious whether LyX still exists
in the hamm distribution.
This was the only available word processor that came with Debian.
I know that it is technically a pain in the CENSORED FOR YOUR SANITY,
and that anyone who can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory S. Stark) writes:
I asked once earlier, but no one responded:
Does anyone know how PAM modules should be packaged?
You can look at Red Hat for examples.
Where should they be installed? Is there some way to register them, or some
script to run to offer the
Will Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just installed Jim Pick's Gnome .20 .debs and they're all complaining
that libungif.so.3 can't be found. Where would it be? There's no
libungif package, according to www.debian.org/packages.html.
They are in slink. The depends in gnome is screwed
Alexander Kushnirenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I posted this question in debian-user and got no reply :( May be some of
experts could help me out.
Our university kindly bought us Motif for Linux (SWim 2.1) from Linux System
Labs (http://www.lsl.com). On the CD they send there is an
Brian White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debian 2 ships with Gimp 1 take that redhat :-)
That's assuming that we can get Hamm ready and ship it before RedHat's _next_
release. sigh
They already have 72MB of fixes for 5.1. :) (10MB of fixes to the
libjpeg problem I mentioned earlier, 31MB for
Ray Kinsella [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Er,
Hey all, I have a a few small problems,
I was messing about today on irc.debian.org doling out tech support while
playing around with apackage called Dumb it is a free Doom Graphics
engine. Anyway I got it to compile after some light source
James R. Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd sure like a mechanism, with either email or a browser, to get a
list of the bugs registered against a particular package. It would
help cut down duplicate bug reports. Now, I'm forced to download a
list of *all* the bugs.
What about
Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Tried booting from a floppy created with dd?
Same problem, if memory serves correctly. Will check it out asap.
Upon reflection it occures to me that there are two other possibilities
1) The bios
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Gunthorpe) writes:
APT 0.0.16 is available for both bo and hamm. Please let me know if there
are any bugs that got missed, I'm getting very few bug reports these days.
It is running pretty fine, but there is one thing i
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 11 Jun 1998, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 1998 at 09:41:03AM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
The problem is that the Debian installation kernel tries to be all things
to all people. As there are machines that boot from SCSI drives, it
Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 11, 1998 at 11:45:56AM -0500, Martin Alonso Soto Jacome wrote:
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have wondered why we didn't try this once the kernel supported initrd.
To be honest I haven't figured out yet how to do the device
Jim Pick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joel Klecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 21:20 -0700 1998-06-05, Steve Dunham wrote:
Does anyone have any definite information on the Corel Network
computers? Is anyone else interested in doing a Debian port?
Vincent Renardias is apparently working
Jim Pick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Behan Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They are only giving discounts to OCLUG members, but since I'm in OCLUG,
I could probably approach the appropriate people to do some enquiries.
I wouldn't hold your breath though. OCLUG is very RedHat based.
Does anyone have any definite information on the Corel Network
computers? Is anyone else interested in doing a Debian port?
The pictures of these machines look really sexy, and I've heard that
rumors that they have decent performance and near $1k prices (with
video input and two ethernet
Christian Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PS: The Linux community will not lose me! I'm planning to join Bruce'
effort to set up a new base distribution. If Debian should decide to
support the new base distribution, too, perhaps I could act as person
of contact for Debian.
You should
Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 29 Apr 1998, Bruce Perens wrote:
As I see it there are two major problems that preclude using APT with RPM
as it stands,
1 - They don't actually have package dependencies. They have
dependencies on files - big difference.
2 - They
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2 - They seem to lack a well formed index file, I couldn't find any
rpm index on their ftp site.
Presumably, this could also be addressed by work. [Since it's not
specific to the rpm format, but the rpm site.]
There is an index file in the
Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I checked, Debian and Red Hat were not compatible. (e.g. libpng and
libjpeg have different sonames.)
How did this happen? Shouldn't we try to rectify this ASAP so that there is
binary compatibility?
One small
Shaleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Only if we are wrong. We should endeavor to do what the upstream
maintainer does unless it is flat wrong. We are not RH, maybe they
should make their sonames match ours. No, we should both do what is
right.
I definitely advocate following the upstream
David Welton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Apr 20, 1998 at 03:13:24PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GNOME is currently not very stable and things are changing very
rapidly. Jim Pick is the GNOME guy for Debian. Give it a few more
weeks and I think you will see more.
The thing I
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A long time ago, you wrote:
Is dhcpcd still up for grabs? If so I'd like to take over the package
I asked you once before if you still intended to make a new upload, you said
yes, soon, but I'm still listed as the maintainer. Dhcpcd has some bugs that
that dpkg was designed that robustly.
I guess a libdpkg would fix the startup time issues and if I want
dpkg -S to work faster, I can always write a perl script that does
it, caching the information in a DBM hash that it rebuilds on demand.
Steve Dunham writes (Re: dpkg memory usage):
And the text
Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Frederic Peters wrote:
background where you type your login/password have to be in
only one color, no pixmap. Except that fact, I think a login
screen with only xdm (+xloadimage) can be really cool. I am ok
to make a
John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was upgrading packages on my 64 meg system today ant noticed:
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
24785 root 18 0 12680 12M 568 S 0 0.1 20.0 5:36 dpkg
Yes, that's almost 13 megs used by dpkg,
Dermot John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm a newbie to the Pilot (haven't actually bought one - waiting for the
Palm III to arrive in the shops).
I see there is now a binutils for the pilot and I've seen mention of using
GCC to cross compile for the 68000. Surely to build apps for the
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I understand that the modularized sound drivers are now standard
on Linux 2.0.32 and above. Given that, I think it would be good
if we had a setup utility for sound, like the one provided
with OSS/Linux.
Hmm, I didn't know this was in 2.0.32. I'll
The source package xtar and resultant binary packages xtar-smotif
and xtar-dmotif are now orphaned.
Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jan 05, 1998 at 08:59:50AM +0800, Lindsay Allen wrote:
The kernel-source-2.0.32 deb has a 130K diff file against the standard
source. Just where do these patches come from and why are they necessary?
Is the fact that I _have_ to have
I'm preparing the new version of amaya. (I believe it's ready except
for this one final detail.)
The version I'm releasing is amaya_1.1c-1, it is going into the web
section of hamm (main distribution).
I want it to be an upgrade path for the following:
amaya-static_0.95-1
amaya_0.95-1
David Welton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You might have a look at how Free and Open BSD do things with their
ports system. It doesnt seem that attractive as a package management
system (try installing Xemacs over a 28.8 on a 486;-), but it is done
quite well, and with standard unix tools. It
Charles Briscoe-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just saw this on c.o.l.a. and want to package it:
Title: propsel
Version:27-Nov-1997
Entered-date: 27-Nov-1997
Description:propsel is for people who work with more than a single
X11 display on their
83 matches
Mail list logo
