Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 16 novembre 2009 à 13:55 +0100, Harald Braumann a écrit :
Just because it is a tradition doesn’t mean it’s the correct way.
So far I haven't seen any argument as to why it shouldn't be the correct
way.
It’s broken because:
* there are race
Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:58:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org was
heard to say:
I think that lintian warning is the right way to do it.
I don't -- I think there are too many false positives for a lintian
warning given the thread. I also think this is
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 06:14:34PM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
If the documentation is something designed to be viewed in a web browser
and the user has broadband, it is arguably easier to find it on the web.
Even knowing precisely where it is[/usr/share
to certain positions don't get to do these things.
Travis Crump[not a debian developer]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
in a wallet, not to mention my
passport photo isn't a very good likeness being 9 years old whereas my
license only last 4 years]?
Travis Crump[not a DD, nor have I been to a keysigning]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Nicolas François wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:03:37PM +, Simon Huggins wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:44:38PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Marc Haber [Thu, 05 Jan 2006 14:40:45 +0100]:
Experience with adduser shows that no-one besides the maintainers
themselves and their closest
Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi
As you may or may not know, I'm currently working on packaging
xulrunner, which is ought to be the central point for all future mozilla
technology, meaning that at more or less long term, all mozilla products
(firefox, thunderbird, etc.) will be built on top of it.
Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I wonder, when latest wxwindows2.4 packages will be moved to testing.
If I look at
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?excuse=wxwindows2.4
it is a valid candidate and the dependency from libpng should be fine
as well
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:48:14PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
I've just uploaded aptitude 0.3.4 to experimental. This is basically a
release candidate for 0.4 -- if no nasty bugs crop up, it will be uploaded
as
0.4 in unstable once the translators catch up
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 19:53 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
paddy wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 11:28:14AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:02:02PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
5)==
User specific configuration files for applications are stored in the user's
Simon Richter wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone interested in adopting libical? It has been orphaned for
193 days (#187030). I wouldn't mind removing it, but mozilla
build-depends on it (perhaps this can be changed, tho?).
Mozilla builds fine without libical.
What does happen, then? Will it still be able
Colin Watson wrote:
? I think that's a minimal specification for a correct installer package
which does its work by creating Debian packages; unless you think that
it's better for the installer package to spit out a .deb somewhere which
you then have to install separately, which seems to me like a
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Glenn Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-04-23 03:30]:
If someone missed a meeting because a program they installed out of
Debian had a time bomb in it, they would be justified in questioning
their use of Debian, not just the application.
No. They would be justified in
Marcel Weber wrote:
Hans, I hope that the removal of these credits was a mistake and that
they're going to be included in future releases of testing. ReiserFS is
a really fine piece of software and anyone who helped with it's
development should have the right to be credited if he or she wants
Thomas Hood wrote:
If a target release has been specified, then APT uses the
following algorithm to set the priorities of the instances
of a package. Assign:
priority 100
to the instance of a package that is already
installed (if
15 matches
Mail list logo
