-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:49:28 -0700
Source: libaio
Binary: libaio
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.104-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: William Lee Irwin III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: William Lee Irwin III
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:55:45PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I upgraded my home server machine and at the same time moved from
debian testing to unstable. Now, I've basicly got everything else
working except for nfs. With the old machine and testing distribution
everything was working
Following up to Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED], I've
put together a libaio package at http://holomorphy.com/~wli/libaio/
I figured a year or so was long enough to give people time to complain
about the kernel interface vs. glibc's worker thread -based emulation
library and so on, and thus far I've
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004, Kevin Mark wrote:
also, does anyone know of any other packages that never got in and the
reasons?
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 05:04:03AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
dvdcss code, and some other MPAA bait never did, I think.
Sounds like Must not get Debian wiped
kernel-headers-2.6-k7-smp kernel-image-2.6.6-2-k7 kernel-image-2.6-686
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian kernel team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: William Lee Irwin III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
kernel-headers-2.6-386 - Linux
Maintainer: Debian kernel team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: William Lee Irwin III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
kernel-doc-2.6.6 - Linux kernel specific documentation for version 2.6.6
kernel-patch-debian-2.6.6 - Debian patches to Linux 2.6.6
kernel-source-2.6.6 - Linux kernel source for version
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:23:29AM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
Think about it. You might be next! They will try to make you believe
that what is said in this message cannot be reality. You may think this
is a joke eMail, but it is not. It resembles reality in some regard --
you must
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:08:02PM -0400, Victor Torrico wrote:
I compiled and ran the debian kernel-source-2.5.69 package. It boots OK,
however, none of he modutil functions work. I keep getting the following
error message: QM_MODULES: Function not implemented whenever I try things
such
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:12:35PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
I went back to the archived discussion that took place in October, and
I'm surprised noone pointed this out. As far as I can tell, DivX, what
that codecs package contains, is illegal. It started off the Microsoft
DLLs
I've experienced a bug and I'm not entirely sure what to file it against.
I'm also not sure if anyone else has ever seen this, and was hoping
someone else might try such a setup and verify the bug exists before
really reporting it.
I set up wdm to run X on multiple vt's thusly in
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:02:52AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
I've experienced a bug and I'm not entirely sure what to file it against.
I'm also not sure if anyone else has ever seen this, and was hoping
someone else might try such a setup and verify the bug exists before
really
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:05:02PM -0700, Brent Fulgham wrote:
I need to work with Gwydion Dylan, and noticed we don't currently
have a package for it.
I vaguely remember someone talking about it long ago, but don't
remember what became of it.
I intend to package this Dylan implementation
At some point in the past, I wrote:
I believe someone's already packaged Gwydion Dylan.
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:43:05PM -0700, Brent Fulgham wrote:
I believe these are old libc5 packages. The Gwydion team is
certainly not aware of any current Debian packaging activities,
certainly since
At some point in the past, a nameless Debian user/developer posted:
Why a new zsh was introduced in potato-proposed-updates ? It's not
compatible with thw previous version...
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 07:19:42PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
What do you mean, it's not compatible?
The completion
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:55:16PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
The follwing packages need a new maintainer:
hugs (68186), 33 days old
hugs-doc (68187), 33 days old
I was under the impression that I was taking care of these two
(although I haven't done much with them. Tony
15 matches
Mail list logo
