snip
Yes, sonames can be more or less arbitrary strings. You can certainly use
sonames with debian in them with a fairly high degree of confidence that
upstream won't collide with them.
THAT is cool.
FWIW, FYI, I did some work on that and managed to build xulrunner with
basic sonames
Le mardi 06 décembre 2005 à 20:43 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
THAT is cool.
FWIW, FYI, I did some work on that and managed to build xulrunner with
basic sonames through quite clean additions to the mozilla build system
for the base tree and the nspr tree. I still need to do similar work
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:04:57PM +0100, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Le mardi 06 décembre 2005 à 20:43 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
THAT is cool.
FWIW, FYI, I did some work on that and managed to build xulrunner with
basic sonames through quite clean additions to the
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:28:36AM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was heard to say:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Will all the tools resolving the dependencies be fine with a dependency
on a virtual package without one an a real package ? (like for
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
So my idea is the following :
- First, I want to provide the libs with a correct soname. It won't be
compatible with upstream until some people use clue sticks, but i'll do
my best for them to improve on that point. Having a
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:28:36AM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
So my idea is the following :
- First, I want to provide the libs with a correct soname. It won't be
compatible with upstream until some
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 10:16:38AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 12:28:36AM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 08:58:45AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
So my idea is the following :
- First, I want to provide the libs with a
Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi
As you may or may not know, I'm currently working on packaging
xulrunner, which is ought to be the central point for all future mozilla
technology, meaning that at more or less long term, all mozilla products
(firefox, thunderbird, etc.) will be built on top of it.
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 05:52:03PM -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:47:47PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
As you may or may not know, I'm currently working on packaging
xulrunner, which is ought to be the central point for all future mozilla
9 matches
Mail list logo
