On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 21:55:07 -0400
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This clause has a direct effect on all users,
restricting the use of e.g. encrypted filesystems.
That's a new one on me. I don't think the GFDL restricts
the use of encrypted filesystems.
I have mentioned
Sorry folks, I CC'd: -devel instead of -legal. God I hate Reply-To:s :)
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 12:03:59 -0400
David B Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 21:55:07 -0400
Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This clause has a direct effect on all users,
restricting
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, John Galt wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Fedor Zuev wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Lack of forced distribution is not censorship. Get a clue, or a
dictionary.
Heh.
Why that ugly, non-free GPL license demand from me to
distribute source code?
Op wo 27-08-2003, om 07:02 schreef Fedor Zuev:
c) Accompany it with the information you received as to the offer
to distribute corresponding source code. (This alternative is
allowed only for noncommercial distribution and only if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Fedor Zuev wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Fedor Zuev, missing the point AGAIN, said:
I cannot see any connection between disagreement with anyone
opinion, and the right to censor somebody else's
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Fedor Zuev, missing the point AGAIN, said:
I cannot see any connection between disagreement with anyone
opinion, and the right to censor somebody else's opinion, so
angrily demanded by you.
There's no censorship involved. *sigh* The GNU
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 23:33:28 +0900 (IRKST), Fedor Zuev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Why that ugly, non-free GPL license demand from me to
distribute source code? Source would still be freely available from
the FSF website! Lack of forced distribution do not harm a freedom!
Agree?
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:33:28PM +0900, Fedor Zuev wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Fedor Zuev, missing the point AGAIN, said:
I cannot see any connection between disagreement with anyone
opinion, and the right to censor somebody else's opinion, so
angrily
Fedor Zuev, missing the point AGAIN, said:
I cannot see any connection between disagreement with anyone
opinion, and the right to censor somebody else's opinion, so
angrily demanded by you.
There's no censorship involved. *sigh* The GNU Manifesto would still be
freely available from the
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 06:05:55PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Fedor Zuev, missing the point AGAIN, said:
I cannot see any connection between disagreement with anyone
opinion, and the right to censor somebody else's opinion, so
angrily demanded by you.
There's no censorship
10 matches
Mail list logo
