Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:24:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Historically such
problems were unpleasantly frequent on buildds due to a combination of
buggy
postrm scripts, and a bug in dpkg's rollback
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
The same happened to the planner package, and has been reported as
#344538. It seems that hppa buildd is broken, don't know yet whether
the buildd admin (Lamont) or anybody of the
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
The same happened to the planner package, and has been reported as
#344538. It seems that hppa buildd is broken, don't know
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
It *seems* it has been fixed; but I don't know whether it has just
disappeared, or has been fixed by human intervention, and if yes by
which. Since the first may be true, it might as well
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or a bug in some
maintainer script or other;
How a bug in a maintainer script could have the result that installing
an arch-all package fails because an other arch-all package is not
LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or a bug in some
maintainer script or other;
How a bug in a maintainer script could have the result that installing
an arch-all package fails because
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:24:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Historically such
problems were unpleasantly frequent on buildds due to a combination of buggy
postrm scripts, and a bug in dpkg's rollback support when calling dpkg
--purge for a
7 matches
Mail list logo
