Steffem Joeris wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:10:12 pm Romain Beauxis wrote:
Le Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:59:00 Sebastien Delafond, vous avez écrit :
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
important for jruby...
to have 2
Le Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:59:00 Sebastien Delafond, vous avez écrit :
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
important for jruby...
to have 2 versions of jruby available ? I guess so you can at least, for
instance, try the new
On 07/04/09 at 23:44 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Sebastien Delafond dijo [Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:59:00PM -0700]:
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
important for jruby...
to have 2 versions of jruby available ? I guess so
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:10:12 pm Romain Beauxis wrote:
Le Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:59:00 Sebastien Delafond, vous avez écrit :
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
important for jruby...
to have 2 versions of jruby available
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
* Package name: jruby1.2
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : The JRuby Team
* URL : http://jruby.codehaus.org/
* License : tri-license CPL/GPL/LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 12:09:56PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org
* Package name: jruby1.2
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : The JRuby Team
* URL : http://jruby.codehaus.org/
*
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
Why do we need jruby1.0, jruby1.1 and now jruby1.2 ?
so multiple versions of jruby can be simultaneously installed on a
system, like with python2.x, ruby1.x, etc ?
Cheers,
--Seb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
+ Sebastien Delafond (Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:08:17 -0700):
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
Why do we need jruby1.0, jruby1.1 and now jruby1.2 ?
so multiple versions of jruby can be simultaneously installed on a
system, like with python2.x, ruby1.x, etc ?
The question was, rather: why would a
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:08:17PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
Why do we need jruby1.0, jruby1.1 and now jruby1.2 ?
so multiple versions of jruby can be simultaneously installed on a
system, like with python2.x, ruby1.x, etc ?
While I see why it can be
On Apr/07, Adeodato Simó wrote:
The question was, rather: why would a user want to install jruby1.0 or
jruby1.1 instead of jruby1.2? What purpose does it serve having three
different versions in the archive instead of one, or two at most?
jruby1.0 will indeed be removed shortly from the
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:40:54PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
On Apr/07, Adeodato Simó wrote:
The question was, rather: why would a user want to install jruby1.0 or
jruby1.1 instead of jruby1.2? What purpose does it serve having three
different versions in the archive instead of one,
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
important for jruby...
to have 2 versions of jruby available ? I guess so you can at least, for
instance, try the new one on your existing jruby code without removing
the old one, for instance ?
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports
both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1
still be needed ?
As I said in my other mail, for transition reasons;
backward-compatibility is something many people like to
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:17:09PM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports
both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1
still be needed ?
As I said in my other mail, for
Sebastien Delafond dijo [Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:59:00PM -0700]:
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
important for jruby...
to have 2 versions of jruby available ? I guess so you can at least, for
instance, try the new one on
Sebastien Delafond dijo [Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:17:09PM -0700]:
On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
But why a need for two versions at a time ? AFAICS, jruby 1.2 supports
both ruby 1.8 *and* 1.9, as jruby 1.1 does, so why would jruby 1.1
still be needed ?
As I said in my other mail, for
16 matches
Mail list logo
