On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:58:21PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Incoming code of possible security significance should be reviewed for
at least common classes of security holes. Instead, we get a thread where
the ITPer is required to prove that nothing in Debian can do what his
package does.
You
Long Description:
Woof (Web Offer One File) is a tool to copy files between hosts. It can
serve a specified file on HTTP,just for a given number of times, and then
shutdown. It can be easily used to share files across the computers on a
net, and given that the other ends should have just a
Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 01:33 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 15:18:26 Josselin Mouette wrote:
No. gnome-user-share does not need root permissions.
I use kde. After installing your gnome-user-share it i couldn't find how to
start it. I found a
On 07.09.2010 11:17, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:47:08 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Oh, please. If you want to setup such schemes, why would you not want to
spend 5 minutes to configure apache or lighttpd instead of spending at
least the same time to configure such an
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 15:18, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 11:17 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:47:08 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Oh, please. If you want to setup such schemes, why would you not want to
spend 5 minutes to
On Wednesday 08 September 2010 09:28:24 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 01:33 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 15:18:26 Josselin Mouette wrote:
No. gnome-user-share does not need root permissions.
I use kde. After installing your
On 2010-09-08, Salvo Tomaselli tipos...@tiscali.it wrote:
This would already reduce the load on the FTP, release and security
teams, and allow their members to do more useful things.
And would lead many people to choose other distributions that offer more
than merely core packages.
Could
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 08:03:14PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
This would already reduce the load on the FTP, release and security
teams, and allow their members to do more useful things.
And would lead many people to choose other distributions that offer more than
merely core packages.
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
That is: considering that introducing a new web server in the archive
will potentially increase the work of the security team, it must be
worth.
You know, introducing any package that is capable of network traffic
in either direction can potentially increase the work
Andrea Colangelo wrote, Tuesday 07 September 2010
* URL : http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/
http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/woof.html
Josselin Mouette wrote, Tuesday 07 September 2010:
Oh yeah. We didn’t have enough webservers in the archive.
Joss, you could even be right,
On Sep 07, Andrea Gasparini ga...@yattaweb.it wrote:
Brian, it lacks the long description, right, we'll provide one asap.
Though, it serves just one file a given number of times, and then shutdown.
It's something useful for distributing file in a LAN, if you don't want to
install and setup
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 00:22:26 brian m. carlson wrote:
We have a lot of web servers in Debian. Could you provide a long
description for the package that helps an adminstrator decide why she
might want to install woof instead of some other lightweight web
server?
I maintain a similar
Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 10:25 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
I maintain a similar package (weborf), but yet with some differences.
Weborf uses a basedirectory param while woof can use a directory or a file.
Weborf will not limit the number of connections.
Woof would tar a directory
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:10:22 Marco d'Itri wrote:
Installing lighttpd or something like it requires much less time than
learning the existence of this one.
Not really.
The default installation of lighttpd would put itself in the autostart, maybe
i just wanted to share a file and it
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:47:08 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Oh, please. If you want to setup such schemes, why would you not want to
spend 5 minutes to configure apache or lighttpd instead of spending at
least the same time to configure such an obscure piece of software?
If all you care
[ adding back the ITP to Cc: ]
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:56:15AM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
The default installation of lighttpd would put itself in the autostart, maybe
i just wanted to share a file and it would take time for me to change the
configuration for avoiding autostart and
apt-cache show sendfile gerstensaft
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Le 07/09/2010 11:37, Holger Levsen a écrit :
apt-cache show sendfile gerstensaft
It seems to use its own protocol and needs special software on both
sides. On the other hand, wget or curl is installed on all systems...
and HTTP works also for non-Linux systems.
--
Stéphane
--
To
On 07/09/2010 11:17, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:47:08 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Oh, please. If you want to setup such schemes, why would you not want to
spend 5 minutes to configure apache or lighttpd instead of spending at
least the same time to configure such an
2010-09-07, Stefano Zacchiroli:
[ adding back the ITP to Cc: ]
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 10:56:15AM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
The default installation of lighttpd would put itself in the autostart,
maybe
i just wanted to share a file and it would take time for me to change the
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:02:38 Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
What about using nc ?
nc -l /etc/passwd
http://localhost:/ = bingo.
We will probably not convince you, but there are way too many
alternatives to make the packaging effort worth the time.
you convinced me, and i
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Salvo 'LtWorf' Tomaselli wrote:
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:02:38 Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
What about using nc ?
nc -l /etc/passwd
http://localhost:/ = bingo.
We will probably not convince you, but there are way too many
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:02:38 Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
What about using nc ?
nc -l /etc/passwd
http://localhost:/ = bingo.
We will probably not convince you, but there are way too many
alternatives to make the packaging effort worth the time.
you convinced
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:54:37 Michael Tautschnig wrote:
mich...@apple[12:50]:~$ uname -o
Darwin
mich...@apple[12:50]:~$ which nc
/usr/bin/nc
And, well, even a Windows version exists, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netcat#Variants
Have you considered how many windows and mac users
Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 11:17 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:47:08 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Oh, please. If you want to setup such schemes, why would you not want to
spend 5 minutes to configure apache or lighttpd instead of spending at
least the same
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Salvo 'LtWorf' Tomaselli wrote:
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 12:02:38 Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
What about using nc ?
nc -l /etc/passwd
http://localhost:/ = bingo.
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 15:18:26 Josselin Mouette wrote:
No. gnome-user-share does not need root permissions.
I use kde. After installing your gnome-user-share it i couldn't find how to
start it. I found a configuration window but netstat -l doesn't show anything
listening.
Also no man
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrea Colangelo war...@ubuntu.com
* Package name: woof
Version : 2009.12.27
Upstream Author : Simon Budig si...@budig.de
* URL : http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: Python
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:55:51PM +0200, Andrea Colangelo wrote:
* Package name: woof
Version : 2009.12.27
Upstream Author : Simon Budig si...@budig.de
* URL : http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: Python
Description
2010-09-06, brian m. carlson:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:55:51PM +0200, Andrea Colangelo wrote:
* Package name: woof
Version : 2009.12.27
Upstream Author : Simon Budig si...@budig.de
* URL : http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/
* License : GPL2
30 matches
Mail list logo
