On 01/16/2015 08:36 AM, Riley Baird wrote:
On 16/01/15 12:40, Paul Wise wrote:
ITP submitters aren't necessarily subscribed to debian-devel, please
CC the submitter and their bug.
Sorry, will do. I just hit the Reply List button in Thunderbird
without checking the addresses.
I made the
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:32:41AM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
(Also, in any case, don't you think that this game is going a little too
far? It's fine to be opposed to systemd, but don't do to Lennart
Well, do you see a difference to the original game with Bill Gates?
Stephan
--
|
On 16/01/15 08:15 AM, Stephan Seitz wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:32:41AM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
(Also, in any case, don't you think that this game is going a little too
far? It's fine to be opposed to systemd, but don't do to Lennart
Well, do you see a difference to the original game
Hello.
Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's
local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills.
On 01/16/2015 03:48 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 16/01/15 08:15 AM, Stephan Seitz wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 07:32:41AM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
(Also,
Dmitry Yu Okunev, le Fri 16 Jan 2015 16:48:09 +0300, a écrit :
I'd also object on the technical grounds that we already have xbill and
the changes in xlennart don't truly justify a fork.
This could be easily solved by merging xbill with xlennart to xperson
with collection of this people
Hello.
On 01/16/2015 05:46 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Dmitry Yu Okunev, le Fri 16 Jan 2015 16:48:09 +0300, a écrit :
I'd also object on the technical grounds that we already have xbill and
the changes in xlennart don't truly justify a fork.
This could be easily solved by merging xbill with
Dmitry,
On 16/01/15 09:48 AM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's
local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills.
It's an ITP, so it goes to debian-devel by default to discuss amongst
ourselves whether a package is suitable
Hi,
On 16.01.2015 14:48, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
Hello.
Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's
local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills.
You are welcome to discuss this game on our dedicated Debian Games
mailing list,
On 16/01/15 11:34 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
My personal opinion is that both XBill and xlennart are mildly
entertaining and it is rather immature to depict living people as a
virus. The message is either silly or offensive.
While we're talking about personal opinions, and clarifying for
On 01/16/2015 06:34 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
On 16.01.2015 14:48, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
I'd also object on the technical grounds that we already have xbill and
the changes in xlennart don't truly justify a fork.
This could be easily solved by merging xbill with xlennart to xperson
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 16:48 +0300, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
Hello.
Is it really necessary to discuss this on debian-devel@? IMHO, it's
local issue, yet… And also please sorry for my English skills.
On 01/16/2015 03:48 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On 16/01/15 08:15 AM, Stephan Seitz wrote:
Hi,
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk writes:
Practically, it's more important to maintain good relations with Lennart
Poettering than with Bill Gates.
fwiw I don't think Lennart Poettering personally would care very
much. He has a thick skin and has more than once poked fun at people for
Axel Wagner m...@merovius.de writes:
[…]
I don't think Lennart personally would care, no, but I think *we*
should care to paint the Opensource community as better than this.
As a member of the said community, I think that, however the
presence of either of the packages in
While not a full-scale ad-hominem attack, I’d say that the two
differences I know of between the vrms operation and the
official FSF position amount to a misrepresentation at best.
Are we going to drop that package, too?
If you apt-cache show vrms, you will see the
Ivan Shmakov i...@siamics.net writes:
While not a full-scale ad-hominem attack, I’d say that the two
differences I know of between the vrms operation and the
official FSF position amount to a misrepresentation at best.
Are we going to drop that package, too?
I don't
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Yu Okunev dyoku...@ut.mephi.ru
* Package name: xlennart
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Gethyn Thomas Quail xylem2...@gmail.com
* URL : https://github.com/xaionaro/xlennart
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
* URL : https://github.com/xaionaro/xlennart
The URL should be the main branch of xlennart; that is
https://github.com/Xylemon/xlennart
if there are other packages providing similar functionality, how does it
compare?
This's a fork of XBill. Everything the same, just with
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Riley Baird wrote:
That sounds like a lot of code duplication. Is it possible to have a
common library between XBill and XLennart?
ITP submitters aren't necessarily subscribed to debian-devel, please
CC the submitter and their bug.
--
bye,
pabs
On 16/01/15 12:40, Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Riley Baird wrote:
That sounds like a lot of code duplication. Is it possible to have a
common library between XBill and XLennart?
ITP submitters aren't necessarily subscribed to debian-devel, please
CC the submitter and
19 matches
Mail list logo
