Josselin Mouette wrote:
Many thanks to José Luis Tallón for proposing to bake cookies, but there
are already enough cookers in Spain.
Thank you for organizing this all along, and thanks to *all*
contributors, whether they fixed their bugs or not, for helping make a
better free OS for everyone.
, Josselin, for creating and driving an international
Debian bug sprint for fun and cookies. What a great and positive way
to encourage both competition and collaboration. I hope to see more of
these!
--
\ “Anyone who puts a small gloss on [a] fundamental technology, |
`\ calls
Following the previous announcement and corrections I received, I
dispatched cookie assignments using the best available technology [0].
Cookies sent to indisputable winners:
* Yves-Alexis Perez will receive cookies from Frank Lin Piat
* Stefano Zacchiroli will receive cookies from
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:48:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
=2E.. hence, given that Lenny hasn't been release yet, when are we gonna
make another one? :)
Let's make it a Beer Sprint. The winners receive a package with the local
brew from the people who
Chris Bannister wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:48:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
=2E.. hence, given that Lenny hasn't been release yet, when are we gonna
make another one? :)
Let's make it a Beer Sprint. The winners receive a package with the local
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:39 AM, John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Bannister wrote:
But ... *who* is gonna want the aussie beer? :)
Anybody that has had Victoria Bitter before.
I hope that was sarcasm!
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 02:39:47 am John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
Chris Bannister wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:48:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
=2E.. hence, given that Lenny hasn't been release yet, when are we
gonna make another one? :)
Let's
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 00:21:07 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:48:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Let's make it a Beer Sprint. The winners receive a package with the
local brew from the people who didn't manage to fix their bugs. I'm
offering German beer to
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:22:57AM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
In Sicily we *do* have local breweries ;)
WOW o_O. In Bologna I was aware of only one :(
So you just have to *loose* the forthcoming competition and send beer
to everybody :-P
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:32:37 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:22:57AM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
In Sicily we *do* have local breweries ;)
WOW o_O. In Bologna I was aware of only one :(
So you just have to *loose* the forthcoming competition and send beer
to
Hi folks,
the lenny Bug Sprint is over. I think it is a mitigated success. A
success since a number of RC bugs were fixed, but mitigated by the small
number of players.
I’d like to thank all players for their contributions. The game was not
really fair since some issues were much easier to deal
Joss wrote:
The following people failed to fix the bugs they were assigned, but the
issues were either too complex or already tackled by other people. They
are encouraged to contribute to the baking effort, still!
* Josselin Mouette (fr) for not fixing the hppa kernel (I will
bake
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:39:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
* Sean Finney (us) for downgrading #501574 and fixing #267040
i'm in .se, actually :)
sean
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 31/10/08 at 13:39 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
The following people definitely deserve cookies. They provided patches
for long-standing RC issues which are all fixed or soon to be.
* Lucas Nussbaum (fr) and Emmanuel Bouthenot (fr) for working
together on #501800/#496954
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:39:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
The following people deserve a honorable mention for dealing with their
bugs.
* Gaudenz Steinlin for proposing approaches for #488669 (this is
still work in progress)
Oh thanks for the honorable mention. I will
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 01:39:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
the lenny Bug Sprint is over. I think it is a mitigated success.
^^^
this
I think it was a great success, it has proven that fun/game is a good
motivation among hackers, and that initiatives like this should be
done more
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
=2E.. hence, given that Lenny hasn't been release yet, when are we gonna
make another one? :)
Let's make it a Beer Sprint. The winners receive a package with the local
brew from the people who didn't manage to fix their bugs. I'm offering
German beer to five winners,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 07:48:21PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Let's make it a Beer Sprint. The winners receive a package with the
local brew from the people who didn't manage to fix their bugs. I'm
offering German beer to five winners, just as Joss did for cookies.
Why not, but note that
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Why not, but note that local breweries are not that common around the
world as they are (IIRC) in Germany. At least they weren't that common
in Italy, but that's compensated by home-made liquors usually :) So
let's generalize it to whatever liquid containing
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Paul Wise (au) for fixing #479607 (still to be uploaded)
:D cookies :D
On the serious side, as I wrote in the bug report, I'm not as familiar
with debconf and maintainer scripts as I should be in order to fix
On Oct 21, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that filing lots of bugs about missing Depends on
update-inetd really delays the release. Chris Lamb is fixing those bugs
faster than I file them anyway ;)
WTF? Packages other than inetd daemons MUST NOT depend on update-inetd.
On 30/10/08 at 13:50 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Oct 21, Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that filing lots of bugs about missing Depends on
update-inetd really delays the release. Chris Lamb is fixing those bugs
faster than I file them anyway ;)
WTF? Packages other
The Bug Sprint has just started!
We have 27 players who registered to win cookies.
The list of players and the bug they are affected is available at the
usual place:
http://wiki.debian.org/BugSprint
Thanks for your contribution, and good luck in the game
On 22/10/08 at 20:38 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit :
So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale)
does not count
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 22/10/08 at 20:38 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
If everything goes the way I want it to be, it won't be just lucas the one
filing reports: I asked lucas if he could do the remove/purge test in lenny
I'll do that.
Thanks :)
and
the full install/remove/purge
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit :
So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale)
does not count in the great cookie contest?
Of course it does count;
Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit :
So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale)
does not count in the great cookie contest?
Of course it does count; added to the rules in the wiki page.
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your
At Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:43:01 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote
Fixing a RC bug means either of:
* Uploading a NMU that fixes the bug to unstable.
* Convincing, with a mail that details the rationale, a release
manager to tag the bug lenny-ignore.
* Convincing, in a
On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit :
So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale)
does not count in the great cookie contest?
Of course it does count; added to the rules in the
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Does bribing lucas into not using grid5k anymore works too ? :)
Definitely! Please add it to the rules :)
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
[EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} --
Josselin Mouette wrote:
we are currently very close to release lenny which is most likely going
to be absolutely awesome.
However, there are currently around 100 RC bugs remaining
Apologies if this has already been brought up.
Using the number RC bugs that a present in lenny and sid
On 21/10/08 at 14:11 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On mar, oct 21, 2008 at 11:57:48 +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 21 octobre 2008 à 08:53 -0300, David Bremner a écrit :
So downgrading bugs to non-RC severity (with appropriate rationale)
does not count in the great cookie
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:39 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I'm not sure that filing lots of bugs about missing Depends on
update-inetd really delays the release. Chris Lamb is fixing those bugs
faster than I file them anyway ;)
You mean like this one?
Stefano Zacchiroli dijo [Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:50:59AM -0500]:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:11:04PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Does bribing lucas into not using grid5k anymore works too ? :)
Definitely! Please add it to the rules :)
Can Lucas be bribed with cookies? I always noticed some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
people seem to lose focus on this urgent need for the release. So the
idea is:
122 developers × 5 days = 122 RC bugs fixed
The rules are : at
Hi,
there are currently 122 RC bugs remaining that affect both testing and
unstable. We need to fix them NOW.
However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
people seem to lose focus on this urgent need for the release. So the
idea is:
122 developers × 5 days
Hi,
there are currently 122 RC bugs remaining that affect both testing and
unstable. We need to fix them NOW.
However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
people seem to lose focus on this urgent need for the release. So the
idea is:
122 developers × 5 days =
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
there are currently 122 RC bugs remaining that affect both testing and
unstable. We need to fix them NOW.
However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
people seem to lose focus on this urgent need for the release.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:04:12PM +, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Hi,
there are currently 122 RC bugs remaining that affect both testing and
unstable. We need to fix them NOW.
However, in the permanent BSP state that has lasted for quite some time,
people seem to lose focus on this urgent
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du vendredi 10 octobre 2008, vers
14:04, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
The rules are : at the end of a 5-day period, the bug you are assigned
must be closed in unstable or have a lenny-ignore tag. Otherwise this is
a free-for-all.
The
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 02:04:12PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
All we need is 122 skilled developers willing to sign in this contract
(with their blood).
Does it sound like a realistic idea? If people agree with it, I’ll setup
a wiki page to collect the volunteer list and send an
Simon Josefsson wrote:
Would using a gnuherds.org pledge on RC bugs be useful here? Then
people can donate money to get RC bugs fixed in debian, and people who
fix the bug can claim the money. The claims and pledges would be open,
which I think is important.
I understand there could be
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 07:50:10PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du vendredi 10 octobre 2008, vers
14:04, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
The rules are : at the end of a 5-day period, the bug you are assigned
must be closed in unstable or
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:55:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 07:50:10PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du vendredi 10 octobre 2008, vers
14:04, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
The rules are : at the end of a
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Would using a gnuherds.org pledge on RC bugs be useful here? Then
people can donate money to get RC bugs fixed in debian, and people who
fix the bug can claim the money. The claims and pledges would be open,
which I think is important.
I
45 matches
Mail list logo
