On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 01:41:32PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On a related note...
While we might criticise rpm for its bad conffile handling, dpkg is
itself fairly woeful, and if we change one thing for wheezy+1, it
should be sane conffile handling. dpkg should never forget about
conffiles;
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:53:34AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
If dpkg kept a copy of the original configuration file (to be retrieved
at all times), it would be easier to spot local changes.
I use etckeeper to do that, but it's a bit tiresome to isolate all
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 13:41:32 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:53:34AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
If dpkg kept a copy of the original configuration file (to be retrieved
at all times), it would be easier to spot local changes.
I use
3 matches
Mail list logo
