Here are my thoughts:
Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--On Thu, Apr 30, 1998 1:57 pm -0400 Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Keep source in Source Format and use the .deb files for what they were
intended, the distribution of binary components.
I have little doubt you're
Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be a great idea to have source dependencies. I compile all
sources on my debian mirror and most fail because of missing
files. One then has to search the package and install that before
compiling again.
A very simple way to improve in this area
On 7 May 1998, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It would be a great idea to have source dependencies. I compile all
sources on my debian mirror and most fail because of missing
files. One then has to search the package and install that before
compiling again.
--On Thu, May 7, 1998 10:38 am -0400 Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
WRT [Falk's] suggestion above, I don't think that developers can/should
edit
the .dsc file (its check sum is computed by dpkg and provided in the
changes file for dinstall to verify the components).
The correct
Hi,
Dale == Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dale On 7 May 1998, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Dale Whithout meaning to sound too negative, I want to caution
Dale against such patch and fill design. Ian J. worked very hard (and
Dale was very successful in my opinion) to design the current source
--On Thu, Apr 30, 1998 1:57 pm -0400 Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Keep source in Source Format and use the .deb files for what they were
intended, the distribution of binary components.
I have little doubt you're right. I know none of the background.
But... I think it would be nice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Jules Bean wrote:
[ ... ]
Any thoughts?
Very nice... but *not for hamm*, as I said in my first mail.
I was just talking about *hamm*, the distribution that
will not change anymore once it will be released soon.
-BEGIN PGP
7 matches
Mail list logo
