Dear all,
On 2023-05-29 18:11, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Dear GNU/kFreeBSD porters,
>
> Over the past year, GNU/kFreeBSD hasn't seen any significant
> development. After reaching out to various individuals involved, it
> seems unlikely that the situation will change in the foreseeable future.
>
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 18:11 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I would like to emphasize that packages will still be available on
> snapshot.d.o for anyone interested in reviving the port.
And the new port docs mention the potential procedures involved:
https://wiki.debian.org/PortsDocs/New
--
If and when GNU/kFreeBSD is dropped from debian-ports, is it ok to
drop packaging overrides for the architecture from packages in
Unstable?
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 06:11:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Over the past year, GNU/kFreeBSD hasn't seen any significant
> development. After reaching out to various individuals involved, it
> seems unlikely that the situation will change in the foreseeable future.
> Here are some statistics
On 29 May 2023, at 17:11, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> Dear GNU/kFreeBSD porters,
>
> Over the past year, GNU/kFreeBSD hasn't seen any significant
> development. After reaching out to various individuals involved, it
> seems unlikely that the situation will change in the foreseeable future.
> Here
Dear GNU/kFreeBSD porters,
Over the past year, GNU/kFreeBSD hasn't seen any significant
development. After reaching out to various individuals involved, it
seems unlikely that the situation will change in the foreseeable future.
Here are some statistics that support this observation:
- The last
6 matches
Mail list logo
