On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:52:23AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:44:53AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The numbers specified for update-rc.d must be well ordered according
to the dependencies specified in the LSB headers. That means that that
update-rc.d could keep
On 27.06.2012 11:13, Roger Leigh wrote:
I'd like to suggest that we do the following in sysv-rc update-rc.d:
- wheezy: silently drop start|stop sequence numbers and runlevels
(this is already the case when using insserv, and we can remove the
non-insserv codepaths)
- wheezy+1: warn if
On 01.07.2012 22:58, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 27.06.2012 11:13, Roger Leigh wrote:
- wheezy+2: remove support for the options and error out if used
error out in dh_install or update-rc.d?
^
dh_installinit
It is seriously annoying making up random sequence
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 27.06.2012 11:13, Roger Leigh wrote:
I'd like to suggest that we do the following in sysv-rc update-rc.d:
- wheezy: silently drop start|stop sequence numbers and runlevels
(this is already the case when using insserv,
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 06:39:57PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:52:23AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:44:53AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The numbers specified for update-rc.d must be well ordered
according to the dependencies specified
tags 539591 + patch
thanks
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:40:18PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:02:33AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:39:38PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 06/27/2012 03:46 PM,
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:39:38PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 06/27/2012 03:46 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Yes. See URL:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
Hi folks,
I'd just like to briefly discuss potential plans for update-rc.d
in wheezy+1, and how this might impact on file-rc and sysv-rc.
sysv-rc has defaulted to using LSB header dependencies and insserv
for a few years now. The last few releases
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:44:53AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net writes:
This means that the runlevels and sequence numbers passed as
arguments to update-rc.d will never be used; they will just get
silently discarded. The main problem as I see it is
On Jun 28, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
While we could expend the time and effort to do this, I do have to
question why. What would be the point of this? No one is using
those numbers, so why retain them?
Agreed.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:02:33AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:39:38PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 06/27/2012 03:46 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at
Hi folks,
I'd just like to briefly discuss potential plans for update-rc.d
in wheezy+1, and how this might impact on file-rc and sysv-rc.
sysv-rc has defaulted to using LSB header dependencies and insserv
for a few years now. The last few releases require you to enable
insserv to upgrade, and
[Roger Leigh]
Could [file-rc] use insserv to do the dependency graph and then just
consume the makefile-style dependency list?
Yes. See URL: http://bugs.debian.org/539591 ,
URL: http://bugs.debian.org/573004 and the source of insserv, where
a patch to do this was created and included by Kel.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Yes. See URL: http://bugs.debian.org/539591 ,
URL: http://bugs.debian.org/573004 and the source of insserv, where
a patch to do this was created and included by Kel. The patch has
been available for more than two years.
Hmm, no
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Yes. See URL: http://bugs.debian.org/539591 ,
URL: http://bugs.debian.org/573004 and the source of insserv, where
a patch to do this was created and included by Kel. The patch has
been
On 06/27/2012 03:46 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Yes. See URL: http://bugs.debian.org/539591 ,
URL: http://bugs.debian.org/573004 and the source of insserv, where
a patch to do this was created
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 04:39:38PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 06/27/2012 03:46 PM, Alexander Wirt wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Yes. See URL: http://bugs.debian.org/539591 ,
URL:
17 matches
Mail list logo
