On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 07:24:15PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Hi folks,
Hello,
I have not attended the Hijacking packages for fun and profit BoF at DebConf,
but I would like to share some thoughts on what I read in Steve McIntyre's
report.
It's a good title, that draws attention. :-)
Other than all the above, I have read interesting ideas on objective criteria
in Steve McIntyre's report. Basically my point of this e-mail is that I
welcome a debate on changing the MIA and NMU procedures to introduce objective
criteria with short periods of time so that it becomes easier
Hi,
Hijack tokens
-
At the moment, *any* uploading DD can hijack by simply uploading a new
package version. Is that reasonable, or should we attempt to control
it somehow? There was a concept suggested of hijack tokens - an idea
that maintainers should be allowed to hijack
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:08:15AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Other than all the above, I have read interesting ideas on objective
criteria
in Steve McIntyre's report. Basically my point of this e-mail is that I
welcome a debate on changing the MIA and NMU procedures to introduce
Hi folks,
Here's a summary of what we discussed in the BoF [1] last week (12th
July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video team, the
video of the session is already online [2] in case you missed it. I've
also attached the Gobby notes that were taken during the session. I'd
like to
Dear debian-devel,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 07:24:15PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Here's a summary of what we discussed in the BoF [1] last week (12th
July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video team, the
video of the session is already online [2] in case you missed it. I've
6 matches
Mail list logo
